Peace Homes Aluva

Simplify Building Your Dream Home

Archives June 2009

Debate: Where Will the Power Lie in Iran?

June 16, 2009, 12:00 pm <!– — Updated: 10:08 pm –>

Where Will the Power Lie in Iran?

(Photo: Ben Curtis/Associated Press) Hundreds of thousands protested the result of the election in Azadi Square in Tehran on Monday.

Updated, June 16, 9:15 p.m. | Djavad Salehi-Isfahani, an economist at Virginia Tech, reports from Iran on how young people in small towns are different from their urban counterparts.

Updated, June 16, 4:05 p.m. | Janet Afary, a professor of Middle East history, discusses how gender politics became a central issue in the election.


In the largest antigovernment demonstration since the Iranian revolution of 1979, thousands of people took to the streets in Iran on Tuesday to protest the disputed presidential election in which President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was declared winner this past weekend.

The supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has called for an examination of opposition charges of vote-rigging and the country’s powerful Guardian Council said Tuesday that it would order a partial recount. That concession was rejected by the main opposition candidate, Mir Hussein Moussavi, and other opponents, who demand that a new election be held.

We asked some experts to give some background on the developments over the past few days, and what the Obama administration’s reaction should be.


A Middle-Class Uprising

Abbas Amanat

Abbas Amanat is a professor of history at Yale and author, most recently, of “Apocalytic Islam and Iranian Shi’ism.”

This election and the post-election protests are by far the greatest challenge the Islamic Republic of Iran has faced since its inception in 1979. Neither the downfall of President Banisadr in June 1981 nor the election of Mohammad Khatami to presidency in June 1997 matches in size and intensity the events of the past few weeks.

Even though the outcome is uncertain, the ongoing protests reflect a remarkable phenomenon: the rise of a new middle class whose demands stand in contrast to the radicalism of the incumbent President Ahmadinejad and the core conservative values of the clerical elite, which no doubt has the backing of a religiously conservative sector of the population.

The protesters are far more urban, more educated and more interested in creating their own indigenous secularism than ever in the past.

Nevertheless, this new middle class, a product of the Islamic Revolution that supports Mir Hussein Moussavi and the reformist cleric Mehdi Karroubi, the two moderate opponents of Mr. Ahmadinejad, is a force to be reckoned with. This middle class has a different vision for the Iranian society and state. It is much larger in size and younger in age, politically more engaged and less timid.

Nearly 80 percent of today’s Iranians are urban or semi-urban and with a substantial percentage of them residing in provincial centers with populations over one million. In the 1950’s urban population was around 25 percent and at the time of the Islamic Revolution in 1979 barely exceeded 50 percent. The new middle class wants to participate in the discourse of democracy and create its own indigenous secularism.

Like any other middle class it demands better living standards, more cultural and social freedoms, greater gender balance and women’s rights, ethnic and religious inclusion and better access to the outside world. It wants accountability from the government and it demands to be heard. It is sensitive to Iran’s image abroad and does not wish to be portrayed as extremist and uncouth. It is more articulate, better educated, technologically savvy, and more confident of its own place.

If the conservative forces within the Iranian regime crush the peaceful protest movement they stand to alienate the largest, the most productive sector of the population. This may severally paralyze, even destroy, Iran’s chances to emerge as a prosperous and stable country pivotal to the stability of the whole region.

Read more…


Why Engagement Failed

Meyrav Wurmser

Meyrav Wurmser, the former executive director of the Middle East Media Research Institute, is director of the Center for Middle East Policy at the Hudson Institute.

Ahmadinejad’s recent election “victory” completes a process begun in June 2005, with his first election as president of the Islamic Republic of Iran. After that, Iran went through a quiet revolution consuming the theocracy, which is anchored in the clerics of Qom.

The Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), particularly the veterans of the Iran-Iraq war, had seized ownership of Iranian revolution from the clerics, whom they accused of being weak-willed opportunists who retreated at the first sign of trouble.

The elections represented the last desperate attempt by the clerics of Qom to reassert their legitimacy against a crowd that had already essentially wired all power.

As they have said clearly in their statements, these veterans of that war believe they are the true defenders and vanguards of the revolution, and they have come back to “save” it. For want of better terminology, this can best be described as a theo-fascist coup against a theocracy.

The June 12 elections had come to represent the last desperate attempt by the clerics of Qom to reassert their legitimacy against a crowd that had already essentially wired all power. Knowing that they lacked the repressive powers of the IRGC-run state, they hoped for an “Orange” revolution and sought support from abroad. This took place while we in the West spent immense energy searching to no avail for moderates and moderation, thus ignoring the nature of the regime that we were confronting.

Our ill focus originated in the second Bush administration and culminated in the Obama administration’s heightened attempts to engage the Iranian regime. A string of failed policies and efforts has created dynamics in Tehran that bolstered the most extreme elements and brought about the current crisis. Israel failed to deliver a withering blow against Iran’s proxies in Lebanon and Gaza in the war of 2006. Then the 2007 U.S. National Intelligence Estimate validated Ahmadinejad by claiming, despite evidence to the contrary, that Iran had stopped working on its nuclear program in 2003. The West engaged — and thus legitimized — the Iranian regime over the last few years.

Read more…


The Supreme Leader Is Supreme

Mohsen Milani

Mohsen M. Milani, the chairman of the political science department at South Florida University, is the author of “The Making of Iran’s Islamic Revolution.” He is also the author of “Tehran’s Take: Understanding Iran’s U.S. Policy,” an essay in the current Foreign Affairs.

Will there be a fundamental change in the strategic direction of Iran’s foreign policy? The answer depends on the outcome of the disputed election, as Mir Hossein Mousavi and millions of his supporters have accused the government of staging a premeditated but clumsily executed “electoral coup” against the forces of reform.

Tehran views the U.S. as an existential threat and to counter it has devised a strategy that rests on both deterrence and competition in the Middle East.

Unless there is a fundamental change in the existing structural configuration of the Islamic Republic, or in a change in the institution of the Supreme Leader, it is unlikely that Iran will radically change its foreign policy. If anything, the next president of Iran is likely to rely increasingly on nationalistic sentiments in order to bring harmony to a divided, dynamic and assertive Iranian electorate.

The strategic direction of the Islamic Republic of Iran has always been determined by the Supreme Leader, in consultation with the main centers of power in Iran’s highly factionalized polity. As the second most powerful man in the country, the Iranian president has profound impact on strategy and policy, but the Supreme Leader — Ayatollah Ali Khamenei — is the final “decider.”

As the country’s most powerful figure, he is the commander of the armed forces and in charge of the intelligence and security forces and serves for life. He — not the president — makes the key decisions regarding war and peace, Iran’s nuclear policies, and relations with Washington. The Islamic Constitution was deliberately structured to insure that the unelected component of the government, or its Islamic part, dominates its elected or the republican part.

Read more…


What if Ahmadinejad Really Won?

Djavad Salehi-Isfahani

Djavad Salehi-Isfahani is a professor of economics at Virginia Tech and a guest scholar at the Brookings Institution.

Iran’s young people helped energize this election with the hope that it would bring relief to their twin problems of unemployment and social restrictions.

Moussavi appealed to young Iranians in cities, but not in small towns.

Young people ages 15-29 make up 35 percent of the population but account for 70 percent of the unemployed. In addition, they feel constantly harassed by restrictions on how to dress and who they can hang out with. In the weeks before the election, they had come to believe that, thanks to their sheer numbers (40 percent of the voting age population) and strong determination, they could take control of their destiny by electing a new president. Their optimism was underscored by the fact that though they have no memory of the Islamic Revolution, its founder, Ayatollah Khomeini, or of the 8-year war with Iraq, they chose as their leader — Mir Hussein Moussavi — a well-known figure with strong ties to all three.

Now that the results have gone completely contrary to their expectations, they are naturally very disappointed, and, as the world has witnessed, they are taking great risks to express it.

So far, protests are confined to Tehran and a few large cities, and smaller towns and rural areas have been very quiet. True, large crowds in large urban centers offer a degree of safety that is lacking in rural areas and small towns. But, behind the difference in reactions to Ahmadinejad’s election may lie real divisions among the young Iranians in large cities and in small towns and rural areas. Mr. Moussavi’s main appeal to them was on social, not economic, issues, which are more important to the more affluent youth in Tehran and large urban centers. Indeed, he confined his campaign to Tehran and a few large cities.

Read more…


A Political Wife, a Women’s Movement

Janet Afary

Janet Afary will hold the Mellichamp chair in Global Religions and Modernity at the University of California, Santa Barbara, this fall and is author of “Sexual Politics in Modern Iran.”

The presence of Zahrad Rahnavard, the wife of Mir Hussein Moussavi, was a significant factor in the election. Mr. Moussavi, who is not a very charismatic speaker and had left politics nearly 20 years ago, saw his prospects for victory increase when his wife joined him in the campaign. The well-publicized picture of them holding hands was not merely symbolic.

During the campaign, both spoke out for greater women’s rights, which is an issue that resonates with Iranian voters. Her presence also encouraged other candidates to campaign with their wives, the first time this has happened since the 1979 revolution.

Sexual politics was a dominant focus of the campaign.

Ms. Rahnavard was a leftist long before she became an Islamist, and in that sense she and her husband are different from the more conservative rightist Islamists.

Leftist Islamists were moved by social and economic concerns of the poor and dispossessed, and thought that Islam would be a unifying ideology toward greater social progress and democracy in Iranian society. Since 1979, both she and her husband have gone through a series of changes. She has become a strong advocate of women’s rights and headed al-Zahra Women’s University until President Ahmadinejad removed her from that post in 2005.

Read more…

Forbidden fruit

Posted by desert_blogger

* Tuesday, 7 April 2009 at 08:01 pm

There is a fair amount of media interest today in Dubai. Not all of it fair. Some such reports have in fact spawned a genre all of their own – popularly known as “Dubai bashing.” In the words of a very popular man, to be revealed below, “Only a fruit laden tree has stones thrown at it.” So this will be a brief post, but one that I feel a certain duty to write.

Though many aspects of life here should indeed be put under the microscope, it should not be forgotten that the city, and its burgeoning growth, has repackaged the Middle East in the thoughts of many people. The means of its arrival on the world stage were questioned by last night’s documentary, rightly so, but a huge experiment is underway , that mixes culture, ethnicity, and religion. It was never going to be easy.

This is a city experiencing ardent growing pains, that had planned to grow when growth became systemically impossible. I’ve written before that there is no shame in taking a hit due to the behaviour of a posse of greed-fuelled, unregulated, Western-centric, champagne-guzzling, yacht-sailing, cigar-waving bankers, injected to the hilt with bonus cheques and platinum credit cards, too busy getting their nails manicured, their empty suits fitted, their egg-shell-white-with-raised-gold-type business cards printed, and their lazy, sponging sons into the same company as them, to notice that they were dragging not just their partner for the night, but also the entire capitalist system, to its grubby knees.

It’s true. The economy of the state of Dubai has taken an unfair battering from the international press of late. Dubai found itself in an unfortunate position when the credit situation turned from crunch to bite. The city was in the midst of inflating a real estate bubble, like many tiger-economies before it.

To draw a parallel, In Hong-Kong, property crashed in 1997, sliding 40%-60% as a result of the collapse of the Thai baht and subsequent Asian financial crisis. Within months, a penthouse overlooking Hong-Kong’s Victoria Harbour shed so much value it was worth little more than, well, a shed.

So when the worst global recession since the great depression reared its ugly head last year, and the international liquidity river ran dry, Dubai, busy whistling away, blowing up balloons in the corner of the room and generally minding its own business, found its throat was particularly parched.

Add to this the fact that Dubai has opened its doors to the world, inviting those from all over to come and help build a nation. When you consider that around 90% of the population are non-UAE citizens, you begin to get a hold on the importance of foreign cash (and labour) to the economy. Again, not an easy situation to be in, when a global recession chooses to attack.

Paint a picture, if you will, of a grinning magician – circa Paul Daniels – who came along at the close of 2008 and in a flash swept the tablecloth from beneath Dubai’s tea-set. But here’s the point. The tea-set is still standing, albeit on shaky ground.

Dubai bashing is a very real phenomenon. I wouldn’t be surprised to see it as the exhibition sport at the next Olympics. Now, I’m not one to cast doubt on other’s work. But, to raise some choice points from recent articles on Dubai: No, the Palm island is not sinking; No, the streets are not plagued with broke expats dusting the sand from their clothes after another night sleeping in the sand dunes; and I’ve turned on the taps THOUSANDS of times, and a river of cockroaches has never come pouring out (thank the NY Times for that pearl!)

The point of this post is that it’s important to get things in perspective. The lack of media freedom here, that I have touched on numerous times, has the unfortunate side effect of destroying credibility – it is simply not possible to differentiate the truths from the half-truths, and the assumptions from the down right lies, unless you are here, staring it in the face.

That’s why I pay my respects to Ben Anderson, the journalist behind Panorama: Slumdogs and Millionaires. Yes, OK, I still haven’t seen it, but the man was here, for three months, and he raised a deeply important issue; that of the exploitation of migrant workers. But such sterling work must be separated from that which is less so.

I will not give up on the case of the construction labourers. It’s too important and unjust. In three weeks, thanks to an event organised by a good friend of mine Oscar Wendel, I am set to be in the same room as the UAE Minister of Labour Saqr Ghobash. And who else will be in the same room? Ellie Larson, the director of the Solidarity Centre, a US-based NGO seeking to build a global solidarity movement. There will never be a more golden opportunity to raise the labour issue back up the flag-pole of the local media where it belongs.

So rest assured, there is still much work to be done. Wrongs to be righted. Sometimes I genuinely do love my job, despite the occasional frustrations. As for Dubai, as it finds itself again thrust into the international media spotlight – and not out of choice this time – the truth is out there. Allegedly. Maybe it’s a place that grew so fast, the wheels of legislation could not keep up. Well if so, they now have their chance.

In a rare moment of solidarity, I’m going to quote Dubai’s ruler, who said last year, at the height of the upsurge in Dubai-bashing: “Only a fruit laden tree has stones thrown at it.” A most articulate point. But who planted the fruit, that the minority may enjoy?

Muslim prosecutor charges discrimination

YOUNGSTOWN — An assistant city prosecutor, who is Muslim, filed a federal lawsuit against the city, the mayor, law director, city prosecutor and co-workers, claiming discrimination and retaliation.

The suit also claims the defendants made a concerted effort to keep him from practicing his religious beliefs.

Ally attends weekly prayer services at his mosque about 1:30 p.m. each Friday as required by his religion, according to his lawsuit filed by Daniel M. Connell, his Cleveland-based attorney.

The city accommodated the request to worship on Friday afternoons until the end of 2007, when co-workers complained to city Prosecutor Jay Macejko that Ally “was receiving preferential treatment,” the lawsuit reads.

“Ally was also subjected to comments regarding his religion and/or national origin” by co-workers, according to the lawsuit.

The issue escalated and on Jan. 11, 2008, the lawsuit contends, Macejko scheduled a staff meeting to discuss the problem on a Friday afternoon conflicting with Ally’s attendance at his mosque services.

“Despite these obvious threats to his job and livelihood, Mr. Ally chose to attend his Friday religious service,” Connell wrote in the lawsuit.

That led to Macejko firing Ally, who earns $61,620 annually as an assistant prosecutor. Guglucello sent a letter three days later putting him on administrative leave, according to the lawsuit.

Ally — described in his lawsuit as a “devout Muslim” — filed a charge of religious discrimination on Jan. 15, 2008, with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission. He returned to work Feb. 4, 2008.

“Defendants took a host of actions designed to harass, intimidate and humiliate” Ally in retaliation for filing the charge, the lawsuit states.

In the lawsuit, Connell wrote that his client was reassigned to a court that meets regularly on Friday afternoons after serving in one that wasn’t in session during that time.

Also, he “began to experience various physical ailments, which, according to his doctors, were occasioned by work-related stress,” the lawsuit reads.

When Ally returned, he was assigned to five straight weeks of night court, a deviation from the normal practice, according to the lawsuit.

Ally is suing the city, Guglucello, Macejko, Mayor Jay Williams and 10 co-workers — listed as John Does 1-10 in the lawsuit — for more than $75,000 accusing them of harassment, creating a hostile work environment and retaliation based on his religious beliefs.

The defendants “deprived [Ally] of federal constitutional and/or statutory rights, including, but not limited to the free exercise of his religious beliefs and equal protection,” the lawsuit reads.

Ray Nakley, spokesman for the Arab-American Community Center of Youngstown, said this is the first lawsuit in the area he knows of involving an employer accused of religious discrimination against a Muslim.

“I have to say it’s new to me,” he said.

Also, a former city worker filed an appeal to a Mahoning County Common Pleas Court judge’s decision to dismiss Youngstown in a wrongful-termination lawsuit.

Gregory A. Gordillo of Cleveland filed the appeal with the 7th District Court of Appeals for his client — former city council Clerk Arlene Bahar — claiming Judge Maureen Sweeney erred in her Feb. 18 decision to throw out the case.

The judge decided city council “likely fired” Bahar because of her “job performance.”

Bahar contends she was fired Feb. 15, 2006, from a job that paid her $62,886 annually, as retaliation after complaining about being sexually harassed by then-Councilman Artis Gillam Sr. for more than four years. Gillam insisted that wasn’t true and sued Bahar for defamation. She countersued for wrongful termination. That case was settled and dismissed Feb. 23.

The dark side of Dubai

The dark side of Dubai

Dubai was meant to be a Middle-Eastern Shangri-La, a glittering monument to Arab enterprise and western capitalism. But as hard times arrive in the city state that rose from the desert sands, an uglier story is emerging. Johann Hari reports

Construction workers in their distinctive blue overalls building the upper floors a new Dubai tower, with the distinctive Burj al-Arab hotel in the background

Workers wait for a bus


The Palm, a man-made archipelago off the coast of Dubai

Workers excavate a building site next to the Emirates Towers

The wide, smiling face of Sheikh Mohammed – the absolute ruler of Dubai – beams down on his creation. His image is displayed on every other building, sandwiched between the more familiar corporate rictuses of Ronald McDonald and Colonel Sanders. This man has sold Dubai to the world as the city of One Thousand and One Arabian Lights, a Shangri-La in the Middle East insulated from the dust-storms blasting across the region. He dominates the Manhattan-manqué skyline, beaming out from row after row of glass pyramids and hotels smelted into the shape of piles of golden coins. And there he stands on the tallest building in the world – a skinny spike, jabbing farther into the sky than any other human construction in history.

But something has flickered in Sheikh Mohammed’s smile. The ubiquitous cranes have paused on the skyline, as if stuck in time. There are countless buildings half-finished, seemingly abandoned. In the swankiest new constructions – like the vast Atlantis hotel, a giant pink castle built in 1,000 days for $1.5bn on its own artificial island – where rainwater is leaking from the ceilings and the tiles are falling off the roof. This Neverland was built on the Never-Never – and now the cracks are beginning to show. Suddenly it looks less like Manhattan in the sun than Iceland in the desert.

Once the manic burst of building has stopped and the whirlwind has slowed, the secrets of Dubai are slowly seeping out. This is a city built from nothing in just a few wild decades on credit and ecocide, suppression and slavery. Dubai is a living metal metaphor for the neo-liberal globalised world that may be crashing – at last – into history.

I. An Adult Disneyland

Karen Andrews can’t speak. Every time she starts to tell her story, she puts her head down and crumples. She is slim and angular and has the faded radiance of the once-rich, even though her clothes are as creased as her forehead. I find her in the car park of one of Dubai’s finest international hotels, where she is living, in her Range Rover. She has been sleeping here for months, thanks to the kindness of the Bangladeshi car park attendants who don’t have the heart to move her on. This is not where she thought her Dubai dream would end.

Her story comes out in stutters, over four hours. At times, her old voice – witty and warm – breaks through. Karen came here from Canada when her husband was offered a job in the senior division of a famous multinational. “When he said Dubai, I said – if you want me to wear black and quit booze, baby, you’ve got the wrong girl. But he asked me to give it a chance. And I loved him.”

All her worries melted when she touched down in Dubai in 2005. “It was an adult Disneyland, where Sheikh Mohammed is the mouse,” she says. “Life was fantastic. You had these amazing big apartments, you had a whole army of your own staff, you pay no taxes at all. It seemed like everyone was a CEO. We were partying the whole time.”

Her husband, Daniel, bought two properties. “We were drunk on Dubai,” she says. But for the first time in his life, he was beginning to mismanage their finances. “We’re not talking huge sums, but he was getting confused. It was so unlike Daniel, I was surprised. We got into a little bit of debt.” After a year, she found out why: Daniel was diagnosed with a brain tumour.

One doctor told him he had a year to live; another said it was benign and he’d be okay. But the debts were growing. “Before I came here, I didn’t know anything about Dubai law. I assumed if all these big companies come here, it must be pretty like Canada’s or any other liberal democracy’s,” she says. Nobody told her there is no concept of bankruptcy. If you get into debt and you can’t pay, you go to prison.

“When we realised that, I sat Daniel down and told him: listen, we need to get out of here. He knew he was guaranteed a pay-off when he resigned, so we said – right, let’s take the pay-off, clear the debt, and go.” So Daniel resigned – but he was given a lower pay-off than his contract suggested. The debt remained. As soon as you quit your job in Dubai, your employer has to inform your bank. If you have any outstanding debts that aren’t covered by your savings, then all your accounts are frozen, and you are forbidden to leave the country.

“Suddenly our cards stopped working. We had nothing. We were thrown out of our apartment.” Karen can’t speak about what happened next for a long time; she is shaking.

Daniel was arrested and taken away on the day of their eviction. It was six days before she could talk to him. “He told me he was put in a cell with another debtor, a Sri Lankan guy who was only 27, who said he couldn’t face the shame to his family. Daniel woke up and the boy had swallowed razor-blades. He banged for help, but nobody came, and the boy died in front of him.”

Karen managed to beg from her friends for a few weeks, “but it was so humiliating. I’ve never lived like this. I worked in the fashion industry. I had my own shops. I’ve never…” She peters out.

Daniel was sentenced to six months’ imprisonment at a trial he couldn’t understand. It was in Arabic, and there was no translation. “Now I’m here illegally, too,” Karen says I’ve got no money, nothing. I have to last nine months until he’s out, somehow.” Looking away, almost paralysed with embarrassment, she asks if I could buy her a meal.

She is not alone. All over the city, there are maxed-out expats sleeping secretly in the sand-dunes or the airport or in their cars.

“The thing you have to understand about Dubai is – nothing is what it seems,” Karen says at last. “Nothing. This isn’t a city, it’s a con-job. They lure you in telling you it’s one thing – a modern kind of place – but beneath the surface it’s a medieval dictatorship.”

II. Tumbleweed

Thirty years ago, almost all of contemporary Dubai was desert, inhabited only by cactuses and tumbleweed and scorpions. But downtown there are traces of the town that once was, buried amidst the metal and glass. In the dusty fort of the Dubai Museum, a sanitised version of this story is told.

In the mid-18th century, a small village was built here, in the lower Persian Gulf, where people would dive for pearls off the coast. It soon began to accumulate a cosmopolitan population washing up from Persia, the Indian subcontinent, and other Arab countries, all hoping to make their fortune. They named it after a local locust, the daba, who consumed everything before it. The town was soon seized by the gunships of the British Empire, who held it by the throat as late as 1971. As they scuttled away, Dubai decided to ally with the six surrounding states and make up the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

The British quit, exhausted, just as oil was being discovered, and the sheikhs who su
ddenly found themselves in charge faced a remarkable dilemma. They were largely illiterate nomads who spent their lives driving camels through the desert – yet now they had a vast pot of gold. What should they do with it?

Dubai only had a dribble of oil compared to neighbouring Abu Dhabi – so Sheikh Maktoum decided to use the revenues to build something that would last. Israel used to boast it made the desert bloom; Sheikh Maktoum resolved to make the desert boom. He would build a city to be a centre of tourism and financial services, sucking up cash and talent from across the globe. He invited the world to come tax-free – and they came in their millions, swamping the local population, who now make up just 5 per cent of Dubai. A city seemed to fall from the sky in just three decades, whole and complete and swelling. They fast-forwarded from the 18th century to the 21st in a single generation.

If you take the Big Bus Tour of Dubai – the passport to a pre-processed experience of every major city on earth – you are fed the propaganda-vision of how this happened. “Dubai’s motto is ‘Open doors, open minds’,” the tour guide tells you in clipped tones, before depositing you at the souks to buy camel tea-cosies. “Here you are free. To purchase fabrics,” he adds. As you pass each new monumental building, he tells you: “The World Trade Centre was built by His Highness…”

But this is a lie. The sheikh did not build this city. It was built by slaves. They are building it now.

III. Hidden in plain view

There are three different Dubais, all swirling around each other. There are the expats, like Karen; there are the Emiratis, headed by Sheikh Mohammed; and then there is the foreign underclass who built the city, and are trapped here. They are hidden in plain view. You see them everywhere, in dirt-caked blue uniforms, being shouted at by their superiors, like a chain gang – but you are trained not to look. It is like a mantra: the Sheikh built the city. The Sheikh built the city. Workers? What workers?

Every evening, the hundreds of thousands of young men who build Dubai are bussed from their sites to a vast concrete wasteland an hour out of town, where they are quarantined away. Until a few years ago they were shuttled back and forth on cattle trucks, but the expats complained this was unsightly, so now they are shunted on small metal buses that function like greenhouses in the desert heat. They sweat like sponges being slowly wrung out.

Sonapur is a rubble-strewn patchwork of miles and miles of identical concrete buildings. Some 300,000 men live piled up here, in a place whose name in Hindi means “City of Gold”. In the first camp I stop at – riven with the smell of sewage and sweat – the men huddle around, eager to tell someone, anyone, what is happening to them.

Sahinal Monir, a slim 24-year-old from the deltas of Bangladesh. “To get you here, they tell you Dubai is heaven. Then you get here and realise it is hell,” he says. Four years ago, an employment agent arrived in Sahinal’s village in Southern Bangladesh. He told the men of the village that there was a place where they could earn 40,000 takka a month (£400) just for working nine-to-five on construction projects. It was a place where they would be given great accommodation, great food, and treated well. All they had to do was pay an up-front fee of 220,000 takka (£2,300) for the work visa – a fee they’d pay off in the first six months, easy. So Sahinal sold his family land, and took out a loan from the local lender, to head to this paradise.

As soon as he arrived at Dubai airport, his passport was taken from him by his construction company. He has not seen it since. He was told brusquely that from now on he would be working 14-hour days in the desert heat – where western tourists are advised not to stay outside for even five minutes in summer, when it hits 55 degrees – for 500 dirhams a month (£90), less than a quarter of the wage he was promised. If you don’t like it, the company told him, go home. “But how can I go home? You have my passport, and I have no money for the ticket,” he said. “Well, then you’d better get to work,” they replied.

Sahinal was in a panic. His family back home – his son, daughter, wife and parents – were waiting for money, excited that their boy had finally made it. But he was going to have to work for more than two years just to pay for the cost of getting here – and all to earn less than he did in Bangladesh.

He shows me his room. It is a tiny, poky, concrete cell with triple-decker bunk-beds, where he lives with 11 other men. All his belongings are piled onto his bunk: three shirts, a spare pair of trousers, and a cellphone. The room stinks, because the lavatories in the corner of the camp – holes in the ground – are backed up with excrement and clouds of black flies. There is no air conditioning or fans, so the heat is “unbearable. You cannot sleep. All you do is sweat and scratch all night.” At the height of summer, people sleep on the floor, on the roof, anywhere where they can pray for a moment of breeze.

The water delivered to the camp in huge white containers isn’t properly desalinated: it tastes of salt. “It makes us sick, but we have nothing else to drink,” he says.

The work is “the worst in the world,” he says. “You have to carry 50kg bricks and blocks of cement in the worst heat imaginable … This heat – it is like nothing else. You sweat so much you can’t pee, not for days or weeks. It’s like all the liquid comes out through your skin and you stink. You become dizzy and sick but you aren’t allowed to stop, except for an hour in the afternoon. You know if you drop anything or slip, you could die. If you take time off sick, your wages are docked, and you are trapped here even longer.”

He is currently working on the 67th floor of a shiny new tower, where he builds upwards, into the sky, into the heat. He doesn’t know its name. In his four years here, he has never seen the Dubai of tourist-fame, except as he constructs it floor-by-floor.

Is he angry? He is quiet for a long time. “Here, nobody shows their anger. You can’t. You get put in jail for a long time, then deported.” Last year, some workers went on strike after they were not given their wages for four months. The Dubai police surrounded their camps with razor-wire and water-cannons and blasted them out and back to work.

The “ringleaders” were imprisoned. I try a different question: does Sohinal regret coming? All the men look down, awkwardly. “How can we think about that? We are trapped. If we start to think about regrets…” He lets the sentence trail off. Eventually, another worker breaks the silence by adding: “I miss my country, my family and my land. We can grow food in Bangladesh. Here, nothing grows. Just oil and buildings.”

Since the recession hit, they say, the electricity has been cut off in dozens of the camps, and the men have not been paid for months. Their companies have disappeared with their passports and their pay. “We have been robbed of everything. Even if somehow we get back to Bangladesh, the loan sharks will demand we repay our loans immediately, and when we can’t, we’ll be sent to prison.”

This is all supposed to be illegal. Employers are meant to pay on time, never take your passport, give you breaks in the heat – but I met nobody who said it happens. Not one. These men are conned into coming and trapped into staying, with the complicity of the Dubai authorities.

Sahinal could well die out here. A British man who used to work on construction projects told me: “There’s a huge number of suicides in the camps and on the construction sites, but they’re not reported. They’re described as ‘accidents’.” Even then, their families aren’t free: they simply inherit the debts.
A Human Rights Watch study found there is a “cover-up of the true extent” of deaths from heat exhaustion, overwork and suicide, but the Indian consulate registered 971 deaths of their nationals in 2005 alone. After this figure was leaked, the consulates were told to stop counting.

At night, in the dusk, I sit in the camp with Sohinal and his friends as they scrape together what they have left to buy a cheap bottle of spirits. They down it in one ferocious gulp. “It helps you to feel numb”, Sohinal says through a stinging throat. In the distance, the glistening Dubai skyline he built stands, oblivious.

IV. Mauled by the mall

I find myself stumbling in a daze from the camps into the sprawling marble malls that seem to stand on every street in Dubai. It is so hot there is no point building pavements; people gather in these cathedrals of consumerism to bask in the air conditioning. So within a ten minute taxi-ride, I have left Sohinal and I am standing in the middle of Harvey Nichols, being shown a £20,000 taffeta dress by a bored salesgirl. “As you can see, it is cut on the bias…” she says, and I stop writing.

Time doesn’t seem to pass in the malls. Days blur with the same electric light, the same shined floors, the same brands I know from home. Here, Dubai is reduced to its component sounds: do-buy. In the most expensive malls I am almost alone, the shops empty and echoing. On the record, everybody tells me business is going fine. Off the record, they look panicky. There is a hat exhibition ahead of the Dubai races, selling elaborate headgear for £1,000 a pop. “Last year, we were packed. Now look,” a hat designer tells me. She swoops her arm over a vacant space.

I approach a blonde 17-year-old Dutch girl wandering around in hotpants, oblivious to the swarms of men gaping at her. “I love it here!” she says. “The heat, the malls, the beach!” Does it ever bother you that it’s a slave society? She puts her head down, just as Sohinal did. “I try not to see,” she says. Even at 17, she has learned not to look, and not to ask; that, she senses, is a transgression too far.

Between the malls, there is nothing but the connecting tissue of asphalt. Every road has at least four lanes; Dubai feels like a motorway punctuated by shopping centres. You only walk anywhere if you are suicidal. The residents of Dubai flit from mall to mall by car or taxis.

How does it feel if this is your country, filled with foreigners? Unlike the expats and the slave class, I can’t just approach the native Emiratis to ask questions when I see them wandering around – the men in cool white robes, the women in sweltering black. If you try, the women blank you, and the men look affronted, and tell you brusquely that Dubai is “fine”. So I browse through the Emirati blog-scene and found some typical-sounding young Emiratis. We meet – where else? – in the mall.

Ahmed al-Atar is a handsome 23-year-old with a neat, trimmed beard, tailored white robes, and rectangular wire-glasses. He speaks perfect American-English, and quickly shows that he knows London, Los Angeles and Paris better than most westerners. Sitting back in his chair in an identikit Starbucks, he announces: “This is the best place in the world to be young! The government pays for your education up to PhD level. You get given a free house when you get married. You get free healthcare, and if it’s not good enough here, they pay for you to go abroad. You don’t even have to pay for your phone calls. Almost everyone has a maid, a nanny, and a driver. And we never pay any taxes. Don’t you wish you were Emirati?”

I try to raise potential objections to this Panglossian summary, but he leans forward and says: “Look – my grandfather woke up every day and he would have to fight to get to the well first to get water. When the wells ran dry, they had to have water delivered by camel. They were always hungry and thirsty and desperate for jobs. He limped all his life, because he there was no medical treatment available when he broke his leg. Now look at us!”

For Emiratis, this is a Santa Claus state, handing out goodies while it makes its money elsewhere: through renting out land to foreigners, soft taxes on them like business and airport charges, and the remaining dribble of oil. Most Emiratis, like Ahmed, work for the government, so they’re cushioned from the credit crunch. “I haven’t felt any effect at all, and nor have my friends,” he says. “Your employment is secure. You will only be fired if you do something incredibly bad.” The laws are currently being tightened, to make it even more impossible to sack an Emirati.

Sure, the flooding-in of expats can sometimes be “an eyesore”, Ahmed says. “But we see the expats as the price we had to pay for this development. How else could we do it? Nobody wants to go back to the days of the desert, the days before everyone came. We went from being like an African country to having an average income per head of $120,000 a year. And we’re supposed to complain?”

He says the lack of political freedom is fine by him. “You’ll find it very hard to find an Emirati who doesn’t support Sheikh Mohammed.” Because they’re scared? “No, because we really all support him. He’s a great leader. Just look!” He smiles and says: “I’m sure my life is very much like yours. We hang out, have a coffee, go to the movies. You’ll be in a Pizza Hut or Nando’s in London, and at the same time I’ll be in one in Dubai,” he says, ordering another latte.

But do all young Emiratis see it this way? Can it really be so sunny in the political sands? In the sleek Emirates Tower Hotel, I meet Sultan al-Qassemi. He’s a 31-year-old Emirati columnist for the Dubai press and private art collector, with a reputation for being a contrarian liberal, advocating gradual reform. He is wearing Western clothes – blue jeans and a Ralph Lauren shirt – and speaks incredibly fast, turning himself into a manic whirr of arguments.

“People here are turning into lazy, overweight babies!” he exclaims. “The nanny state has gone too far. We don’t do anything for ourselves! Why don’t any of us work for the private sector? Why can’t a mother and father look after their own child?” And yet, when I try to bring up the system of slavery that built Dubai, he looks angry. “People should give us credit,” he insists. “We are the most tolerant people in the world. Dubai is the only truly international city in the world. Everyone who comes here is treated with respect.”

I pause, and think of the vast camps in Sonapur, just a few miles away. Does he even know they exist? He looks irritated. “You know, if there are 30 or 40 cases [of worker abuse] a year, that sounds like a lot but when you think about how many people are here…” Thirty or 40? This abuse is endemic to the system, I say. We’re talking about hundreds of thousands.

Sultan is furious. He splutters: “You don’t think Mexicans are treated badly in New York City? And how long did it take Britain to treat people well? I could come to London and write about the homeless people on Oxford Street and make your city sound like a terrible place, too! The workers here can leave any time they want! Any Indian can leave, any Asian can leave!”

But they can’t, I point out. Their passports are taken away, and their wages are withheld. “Well, I feel bad if that happens, and anybody who does that should be punished. But their embassies should help them.” They try. But why do you forbid the workers – with force – from going on strike against lousy employers? “Thank God we don’t allow that!” he exclaims. “Strikes are in-convenient! They go on the street – we’re not having that. We won’t be like France. Imagine a country where they the workers can just stop whenever they want!” So what should the workers do when they are cheated and lied to? “Quit. Lea
ve the country.”

I sigh. Sultan is seething now. “People in the West are always complaining about us,” he says. Suddenly, he adopts a mock-whiny voice and says, in imitation of these disgusting critics: “Why don’t you treat animals better? Why don’t you have better shampoo advertising? Why don’t you treat labourers better?” It’s a revealing order: animals, shampoo, then workers. He becomes more heated, shifting in his seat, jabbing his finger at me. “I gave workers who worked for me safety goggles and special boots, and they didn’t want to wear them! It slows them down!”

And then he smiles, coming up with what he sees as his killer argument. “When I see Western journalists criticise us – don’t you realise you’re shooting yourself in the foot? The Middle East will be far more dangerous if Dubai fails. Our export isn’t oil, it’s hope. Poor Egyptians or Libyans or Iranians grow up saying – I want to go to Dubai. We’re very important to the region. We are showing how to be a modern Muslim country. We don’t have any fundamentalists here. Europeans shouldn’t gloat at our demise. You should be very worried…. Do you know what will happen if this model fails? Dubai will go down the Iranian path, the Islamist path.”

Sultan sits back. My arguments have clearly disturbed him; he says in a softer, conciliatory tone, almost pleading: “Listen. My mother used to go to the well and get a bucket of water every morning. On her wedding day, she was given an orange as a gift because she had never eaten one. Two of my brothers died when they were babies because the healthcare system hadn’t developed yet. Don’t judge us.” He says it again, his eyes filled with intensity: “Don’t judge us.”

V. The Dunkin’ Donuts Dissidents

But there is another face to the Emirati minority – a small huddle of dissidents, trying to shake the Sheikhs out of abusive laws. Next to a Virgin Megastore and a Dunkin’ Donuts, with James Blunt’s “You’re Beautiful” blaring behind me, I meet the Dubai dictatorship’s Public Enemy Number One. By way of introduction, Mohammed al-Mansoori says from within his white robes and sinewy face: “Westerners come her and see the malls and the tall buildings and they think that means we are free. But these businesses, these buildings – who are they for? This is a dictatorship. The royal family think they own the country, and the people are their servants. There is no freedom here.”

We snuffle out the only Arabic restaurant in this mall, and he says everything you are banned – under threat of prison – from saying in Dubai. Mohammed tells me he was born in Dubai to a fisherman father who taught him one enduring lesson: Never follow the herd. Think for yourself. In the sudden surge of development, Mohammed trained as a lawyer. By the Noughties, he had climbed to the head of the Jurists’ Association, an organisation set up to press for Dubai’s laws to be consistent with international human rights legislation.

And then – suddenly – Mohammed thwacked into the limits of Sheikh Mohammed’s tolerance. Horrified by the “system of slavery” his country was being built on, he spoke out to Human Rights Watch and the BBC. “So I was hauled in by the secret police and told: shut up, or you will lose you job, and your children will be unemployable,” he says. “But how could I be silent?”

He was stripped of his lawyer’s licence and his passport – becoming yet another person imprisoned in this country. “I have been blacklisted and so have my children. The newspapers are not allowed to write about me.”

Why is the state so keen to defend this system of slavery? He offers a prosaic explanation. “Most companies are owned by the government, so they oppose human rights laws because it will reduce their profit margins. It’s in their interests that the workers are slaves.”

Last time there was a depression, there was a starbust of democracy in Dubai, seized by force from the sheikhs. In the 1930s, the city’s merchants banded together against Sheikh Said bin Maktum al-Maktum – the absolute ruler of his day – and insisted they be given control over the state finances. It lasted only a few years, before the Sheikh – with the enthusiastic support of the British – snuffed them out.

And today? Sheikh Mohammed turned Dubai into Creditopolis, a city built entirely on debt. Dubai owes 107 percent of its entire GDP. It would be bust already, if the neighbouring oil-soaked state of Abu Dhabi hadn’t pulled out its chequebook. Mohammed says this will constrict freedom even further. “Now Abu Dhabi calls the tunes – and they are much more conservative and restrictive than even Dubai. Freedom here will diminish every day.” Already, new media laws have been drafted forbidding the press to report on anything that could “damage” Dubai or “its economy”. Is this why the newspapers are giving away glossy supplements talking about “encouraging economic indicators”?

Everybody here waves Islamism as the threat somewhere over the horizon, sure to swell if their advice is not followed. Today, every imam is appointed by the government, and every sermon is tightly controlled to keep it moderate. But Mohammed says anxiously: “We don’t have Islamism here now, but I think that if you control people and give them no way to express anger, it could rise. People who are told to shut up all the time can just explode.”

Later that day, against another identikit-corporate backdrop, I meet another dissident – Abdulkhaleq Abdullah, Professor of Political Science at Emirates University. His anger focuses not on political reform, but the erosion of Emirati identity. He is famous among the locals, a rare outspoken conductor for their anger. He says somberly: “There has been a rupture here. This is a totally different city to the one I was born in 50 years ago.”

He looks around at the shiny floors and Western tourists and says: “What we see now didn’t occur in our wildest dreams. We never thought we could be such a success, a trendsetter, a model for other Arab countries. The people of Dubai are mighty proud of their city, and rightly so. And yet…” He shakes his head. “In our hearts, we fear we have built a modern city but we are losing it to all these expats.”

Adbulkhaleq says every Emirati of his generation lives with a “psychological trauma.” Their hearts are divided – “between pride on one side, and fear on the other.” Just after he says this, a smiling waitress approaches, and asks us what we would like to drink. He orders a Coke.

VI. Dubai Pride

There is one group in Dubai for whom the rhetoric of sudden freedom and liberation rings true – but it is the very group the government wanted to liberate least: gays.

Beneath a famous international hotel, I clamber down into possibly the only gay club on the Saudi Arabian peninsula. I find a United Nations of tank-tops and bulging biceps, dancing to Kylie, dropping ecstasy, and partying like it’s Soho. “Dubai is the best place in the Muslim world for gays!” a 25-year old Emirati with spiked hair says, his arms wrapped around his 31-year old “husband”. “We are alive. We can meet. That is more than most Arab gays.”

It is illegal to be gay in Dubai, and punishable by 10 years in prison. But the locations of the latest unofficial gay clubs circulate online, and men flock there, seemingly unafraid of the police. “They might bust the club, but they will just disperse us,” one of them says. “The police have other things to do.”

In every large city, gay people find a way to find each other – but Dubai has become the clearing-house for the region’s homosexuals, a place where they can live in relative safety. Saleh, a lean private in the Saudi Arabian army, has come here for the Coldplay concert, and tells me Dubai is “great” for gays: “In Saudi,
it’s hard to be straight when you’re young. The women are shut away so everyone has gay sex. But they only want to have sex with boys – 15- to 21-year-olds. I’m 27, so I’m too old now. I need to find real gays, so this is the best place. All Arab gays want to live in Dubai.”

With that, Saleh dances off across the dancefloor, towards a Dutch guy with big biceps and a big smile.

VII. The Lifestyle

All the guidebooks call Dubai a “melting pot”, but as I trawl across the city, I find that every group here huddles together in its own little ethnic enclave – and becomes a caricature of itself. One night – in the heart of this homesick city, tired of the malls and the camps – I go to Double Decker, a hang-out for British expats. At the entrance there is a red telephone box, and London bus-stop signs. Its wooden interior looks like a cross between a colonial clubhouse in the Raj and an Eighties school disco, with blinking coloured lights and cheese blaring out. As I enter, a girl in a short skirt collapses out of the door onto her back. A guy wearing a pirate hat helps her to her feet, dropping his beer bottle with a paralytic laugh.

I start to talk to two sun-dried women in their sixties who have been getting gently sozzled since midday. “You stay here for The Lifestyle,” they say, telling me to take a seat and order some more drinks. All the expats talk about The Lifestyle, but when you ask what it is, they become vague. Ann Wark tries to summarise it: “Here, you go out every night. You’d never do that back home. You see people all the time. It’s great. You have lots of free time. You have maids and staff so you don’t have to do all that stuff. You party!”

They have been in Dubai for 20 years, and they are happy to explain how the city works. “You’ve got a hierarchy, haven’t you?” Ann says. “It’s the Emiratis at the top, then I’d say the British and other Westerners. Then I suppose it’s the Filipinos, because they’ve got a bit more brains than the Indians. Then at the bottom you’ve got the Indians and all them lot.”

They admit, however, they have “never” spoken to an Emirati. Never? “No. They keep themselves to themselves.” Yet Dubai has disappointed them. Jules Taylor tells me: “If you have an accident here it’s a nightmare. There was a British woman we knew who ran over an Indian guy, and she was locked up for four days! If you have a tiny bit of alcohol on your breath they’re all over you. These Indians throw themselves in front of cars, because then their family has to be given blood money – you know, compensation. But the police just blame us. That poor woman.”

A 24-year-old British woman called Hannah Gamble takes a break from the dancefloor to talk to me. “I love the sun and the beach! It’s great out here!” she says. Is there anything bad? “Oh yes!” she says. Ah: one of them has noticed, I think with relief. “The banks! When you want to make a transfer you have to fax them. You can’t do it online.” Anything else? She thinks hard. “The traffic’s not very good.”

When I ask the British expats how they feel to not be in a democracy, their reaction is always the same. First, they look bemused. Then they look affronted. “It’s the Arab way!” an Essex boy shouts at me in response, as he tries to put a pair of comedy antlers on his head while pouring some beer into the mouth of his friend, who is lying on his back on the floor, gurning.

Later, in a hotel bar, I start chatting to a dyspeptic expat American who works in the cosmetics industry and is desperate to get away from these people. She says: “All the people who couldn’t succeed in their own countries end up here, and suddenly they’re rich and promoted way above their abilities and bragging about how great they are. I’ve never met so many incompetent people in such senior positions anywhere in the world.” She adds: “It’s absolutely racist. I had Filipino girls working for me doing the same job as a European girl, and she’s paid a quarter of the wages. The people who do the real work are paid next to nothing, while these incompetent managers pay themselves £40,000 a month.”

With the exception of her, one theme unites every expat I speak to: their joy at having staff to do the work that would clog their lives up Back Home. Everyone, it seems, has a maid. The maids used to be predominantly Filipino, but with the recession, Filipinos have been judged to be too expensive, so a nice Ethiopian servant girl is the latest fashionable accessory.

It is an open secret that once you hire a maid, you have absolute power over her. You take her passport – everyone does; you decide when to pay her, and when – if ever – she can take a break; and you decide who she talks to. She speaks no Arabic. She cannot escape.

In a Burger King, a Filipino girl tells me it is “terrifying” for her to wander the malls in Dubai because Filipino maids or nannies always sneak away from the family they are with and beg her for help. “They say – ‘Please, I am being held prisoner, they don’t let me call home, they make me work every waking hour seven days a week.’ At first I would say – my God, I will tell the consulate, where are you staying? But they never know their address, and the consulate isn’t interested. I avoid them now. I keep thinking about a woman who told me she hadn’t eaten any fruit in four years. They think I have power because I can walk around on my own, but I’m powerless.”

The only hostel for women in Dubai – a filthy private villa on the brink of being repossessed – is filled with escaped maids. Mela Matari, a 25-year-old Ethiopian woman with a drooping smile, tells me what happened to her – and thousands like her. She was promised a paradise in the sands by an agency, so she left her four year-old daughter at home and headed here to earn money for a better future. “But they paid me half what they promised. I was put with an Australian family – four children – and Madam made me work from 6am to 1am every day, with no day off. I was exhausted and pleaded for a break, but they just shouted: ‘You came here to work, not sleep!’ Then one day I just couldn’t go on, and Madam beat me. She beat me with her fists and kicked me. My ear still hurts. They wouldn’t give me my wages: they said they’d pay me at the end of the two years. What could I do? I didn’t know anybody here. I was terrified.”

One day, after yet another beating, Mela ran out onto the streets, and asked – in broken English – how to find the Ethiopian consulate. After walking for two days, she found it, but they told her she had to get her passport back from Madam. “Well, how could I?” she asks. She has been in this hostel for six months. She has spoken to her daughter twice. “I lost my country, I lost my daughter, I lost everything,” she says.

As she says this, I remember a stray sentence I heard back at Double Decker. I asked a British woman called Hermione Frayling what the best thing about Dubai was. “Oh, the servant class!” she trilled. “You do nothing. They’ll do anything!”

VIII. The End of The World

The World is empty. It has been abandoned, its continents unfinished. Through binoculars, I think I can glimpse Britain; this sceptred isle barren in the salt-breeze.

Here, off the coast of Dubai, developers have been rebuilding the world. They have constructed artificial islands in the shape of all planet Earth’s land masses, and they plan to sell each continent off to be built on. There were rumours that the Beckhams would bid for Britain. But the people who work at the nearby coast say they haven’t seen anybody there for months now. “The World is over,” a South African suggests.

All over Dubai, crazy projects that were Under Construction are now Under Collapse. They were building an air-conditioned beach here, with cooling pipes runn
ing below the sand, so the super-rich didn’t singe their toes on their way from towel to sea.

The projects completed just before the global economy crashed look empty and tattered. The Atlantis Hotel was launched last winter in a $20m fin-de-siecle party attended by Robert De Niro, Lindsay Lohan and Lily Allen. Sitting on its own fake island – shaped, of course, like a palm tree – it looks like an immense upturned tooth in a faintly decaying mouth. It is pink and turreted – the architecture of the pharaohs, as reimagined by Zsa-Zsa Gabor. Its Grand Lobby is a monumental dome covered in glitterballs, held up by eight monumental concrete palm trees. Standing in the middle, there is a giant shining glass structure that looks like the intestines of every guest who has ever stayed at the Atlantis. It is unexpectedly raining; water is leaking from the roof, and tiles are falling off.

A South African PR girl shows me around its most coveted rooms, explaining that this is “the greatest luxury offered in the world”. We stroll past shops selling £24m diamond rings around a hotel themed on the lost and sunken continent of, yes, Atlantis. There are huge water tanks filled with sharks, which poke around mock-abandoned castles and dumped submarines. There are more than 1,500 rooms here, each with a sea view. The Neptune suite has three floors, and – I gasp as I see it – it looks out directly on to the vast shark tank. You lie on the bed, and the sharks stare in at you. In Dubai, you can sleep with the fishes, and survive.

But even the luxury – reminiscent of a Bond villain’s lair – is also being abandoned. I check myself in for a few nights to the classiest hotel in town, the Park Hyatt. It is the fashionistas’ favourite hotel, where Elle Macpherson and Tommy Hilfiger stay, a gorgeous, understated palace. It feels empty. Whenever I eat, I am one of the only people in the restaurant. A staff member tells me in a whisper: “It used to be full here. Now there’s hardly anyone.” Rattling around, I feel like Jack Nicholson in The Shining, the last man in an abandoned, haunted home.

The most famous hotel in Dubai – the proud icon of the city – is the Burj al Arab hotel, sitting on the shore, shaped like a giant glass sailing boat. In the lobby, I start chatting to a couple from London who work in the City. They have been coming to Dubai for 10 years now, and they say they love it. “You never know what you’ll find here,” he says. “On our last trip, at the beginning of the holiday, our window looked out on the sea. By the end, they’d built an entire island there.”

My patience frayed by all this excess, I find myself snapping: doesn’t the omnipresent slave class bother you? I hope they misunderstood me, because the woman replied: “That’s what we come for! It’s great, you can’t do anything for yourself!” Her husband chimes in: “When you go to the toilet, they open the door, they turn on the tap – the only thing they don’t do is take it out for you when you have a piss!” And they both fall about laughing.

IX. Taking on the Desert

Dubai is not just a city living beyond its financial means; it is living beyond its ecological means. You stand on a manicured Dubai lawn and watch the sprinklers spray water all around you. You see tourists flocking to swim with dolphins. You wander into a mountain-sized freezer where they have built a ski slope with real snow. And a voice at the back of your head squeaks: this is the desert. This is the most water-stressed place on the planet. How can this be happening? How is it possible?

The very earth is trying to repel Dubai, to dry it up and blow it away. The new Tiger Woods Gold Course needs four million gallons of water to be pumped on to its grounds every day, or it would simply shrivel and disappear on the winds. The city is regularly washed over with dust-storms that fog up the skies and turn the skyline into a blur. When the dust parts, heat burns through. It cooks anything that is not kept constantly, artificially wet.

Dr Mohammed Raouf, the environmental director of the Gulf Research Centre, sounds sombre as he sits in his Dubai office and warns: “This is a desert area, and we are trying to defy its environment. It is very unwise. If you take on the desert, you will lose.”

Sheikh Maktoum built his showcase city in a place with no useable water. None. There is no surface water, very little acquifer, and among the lowest rainfall in the world. So Dubai drinks the sea. The Emirates’ water is stripped of salt in vast desalination plants around the Gulf – making it the most expensive water on earth. It costs more than petrol to produce, and belches vast amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as it goes. It’s the main reason why a resident of Dubai has the biggest average carbon footprint of any human being – more than double that of an American.

If a recession turns into depression, Dr Raouf believes Dubai could run out of water. “At the moment, we have financial reserves that cover bringing so much water to the middle of the desert. But if we had lower revenues – if, say, the world shifts to a source of energy other than oil…” he shakes his head. “We will have a very big problem. Water is the main source of life. It would be a catastrophe. Dubai only has enough water to last us a week. There’s almost no storage. We don’t know what will happen if our supplies falter. It would be hard to survive.”

Global warming, he adds, makes the problem even worse. “We are building all these artificial islands, but if the sea level rises, they will be gone, and we will lose a lot. Developers keep saying it’s all fine, they’ve taken it into consideration, but I’m not so sure.”

Is the Dubai government concerned about any of this? “There isn’t much interest in these problems,” he says sadly. But just to stand still, the average resident of Dubai needs three times more water than the average human. In the looming century of water stresses and a transition away from fossil fuels, Dubai is uniquely vulnerable.

I wanted to understand how the government of Dubai will react, so I decided to look at how it has dealt with an environmental problem that already exists – the pollution of its beaches. One woman – an American, working at one of the big hotels – had written in a lot of online forums arguing that it was bad and getting worse, so I called her to arrange a meeting. “I can’t talk to you,” she said sternly. Not even if it’s off the record? “I can’t talk to you.” But I don’t have to disclose your name… “You’re not listening. This phone is bugged. I can’t talk to you,” she snapped, and hung up.

The next day I turned up at her office. “If you reveal my identity, I’ll be sent on the first plane out of this city,” she said, before beginning to nervously pace the shore with me. “It started like this. We began to get complaints from people using the beach. The water looked and smelled odd, and they were starting to get sick after going into it. So I wrote to the ministers of health and tourism and expected to hear back immediately – but there was nothing. Silence. I hand-delivered the letters. Still nothing.”

The water quality got worse and worse. The guests started to spot raw sewage, condoms, and used sanitary towels floating in the sea. So the hotel ordered its own water analyses from a professional company. “They told us it was full of fecal matter and bacteria ‘too numerous to count’. I had to start telling guests not to go in the water, and since they’d come on a beach holiday, as you can imagine, they were pretty pissed off.” She began to make angry posts on the expat discussion forums – and people began to figure out what was happening. Dubai had expanded so fast its sewage treatment facilities couldn’t keep up. The sewage disposal trucks had to queue for
three or four days at the treatment plants – so instead, they were simply drilling open the manholes and dumping the untreated sewage down them, so it flowed straight to the sea.

Suddenly, it was an open secret – and the municipal authorities finally acknowledged the problem. They said they would fine the truckers. But the water quality didn’t improve: it became black and stank. “It’s got chemicals in it. I don’t know what they are. But this stuff is toxic.”

She continued to complain – and started to receive anonymous phone calls. “Stop embarassing Dubai, or your visa will be cancelled and you’re out,” they said. She says: “The expats are terrified to talk about anything. One critical comment in the newspapers and they deport you. So what am I supposed to do? Now the water is worse than ever. People are getting really sick. Eye infections, ear infections, stomach infections, rashes. Look at it!” There is faeces floating on the beach, in the shadow of one of Dubai’s most famous hotels.

“What I learnt about Dubai is that the authorities don’t give a toss about the environment,” she says, standing in the stench. “They’re pumping toxins into the sea, their main tourist attraction, for God’s sake. If there are environmental problems in the future, I can tell you now how they will deal with them – deny it’s happening, cover it up, and carry on until it’s a total disaster.” As she speaks, a dust-storm blows around us, as the desert tries, slowly, insistently, to take back its land.

X. Fake Plastic Trees

On my final night in the Dubai Disneyland, I stop off on my way to the airport, at a Pizza Hut that sits at the side of one of the city’s endless, wide, gaping roads. It is identical to the one near my apartment in London in every respect, even the vomit-coloured decor. My mind is whirring and distracted. Perhaps Dubai disturbed me so much, I am thinking, because here, the entire global supply chain is condensed. Many of my goods are made by semi-enslaved populations desperate for a chance 2,000 miles away; is the only difference that here, they are merely two miles away, and you sometimes get to glimpse their faces? Dubai is Market Fundamentalist Globalisation in One City.

I ask the Filipino girl behind the counter if she likes it here. “It’s OK,” she says cautiously. Really? I say. I can’t stand it. She sighs with relief and says: “This is the most terrible place! I hate it! I was here for months before I realised – everything in Dubai is fake. Everything you see. The trees are fake, the workers’ contracts are fake, the islands are fake, the smiles are fake – even the water is fake!” But she is trapped, she says. She got into debt to come here, and she is stuck for three years: an old story now. “I think Dubai is like an oasis. It is an illusion, not real. You think you have seen water in the distance, but you get close and you only get a mouthful of sand.”

As she says this, another customer enters. She forces her face into the broad, empty Dubai smile and says: “And how may I help you tonight, sir?”

Some names in this article have been changed.

Thai Army Fuels South Unrest

Thai Army Fuels South Unrest

IslamOnline.net & News Agencies

Image

Impunity of Thai soldiers in the Muslim south is blamed for fueling unrest and anger in the violence-ravaged region. (Reuters)

BANA,
Thailand — Sixteen-year-old Muktar was walking to a local football
match in the Muslim-majority south when Thai soldiers shot him in the
head, kicked him into a ditch and left him to die.

Three weeks later, he is now breathing through a tube in his neck.

The gunshot had entered his skull and blown away both eyes.

Two cotton pads now cover
the spots his deformed face where his eyes once were, soaking up the
tears which still, somehow, emerge.

“I feel so much anger
towards the soldiers because I don’t know why they did this,” Muktar
told Agence France-Presse (AFP) on Monday, July 7.

“I want them to be shot like they shot me, and prosecuted.”

Two months after the
shooting, Muktar now spends his days using his feet to navigate the
floorboards in his corrugated iron-framed home, with brain damage which
makes him feel disoriented and wet his bed.

His parents received only a
third of the four million baht (120,000 dollars) they sought from the
government. A promised apology from the soldier never came.

“If the government had more justice we would receive more care from them,” Muktar’s father Jaema said.

The southern provinces of
Pattani, Yala and Narathiwat, an independent Muslim sultanate until
annexed officially a century ago, have been ravaged by an armed
conflict since 2004, leaving more than 2,800 people dead.

Poverty and meager economic development in the Muslim south are blamed as one of the factors fuelling the unrest.

Impunity

Experts say impunity of Thai soldiers in the Muslim south is fueling unrest and anger in the violence-ravaged region.

“Impunity has always been
the root cause of this kind of alienation and anger,” said Sunai
Phasuk, a researcher with Human Rights Watch.

“All that’s important for the radicalization and recruitment of insurgents.”

Before the incident,
Muktar’s village of Bana had been largely safe, but the day after the
shooting, insurgents burned down the local school in the village.

“Residents feel that
they’ve been physically abused by the government so they suddenly turn
a blind eye to whatever insurgents want to do,” Sunai said.

Outrage in the south worsened after a Muslim imam died in the custody of the Thai army in March.

According to an official autopsy, the imam’s body had nine cracked ribs, and an inquiry is underway.

Last month, another imam was shot dead as he walked between a mosque and his nearby home.

The imam’s wife Tuantimoh
said her neighbors suspect soldiers shot him dead because a car was
seen entering a nearby military base shortly after the shooting.

“I don’t trust the military anymore. I want more justice,” Tuantimoh told AFP. “Why don’t they try to find some suspects?”

The Thai military denies soldiers were involved, but this does little to reassure Muslim residents.

“I cannot trust the soldiers now,” one 73-year-old man in Yala told AFP.

“Sometimes they arrest good people who haven’t done anything,” added shopkeeper Asma, 22.

Experts say the conflict will continue until justice prevails in the south.

“With impunity it’s a
vicious circle — people see things starting to fall into place but
before you can end impunity there’s a new case. Just as trust starts to
be built, it collapses.”

Covered life gives new perspective

Covered life gives new perspective

Ana McKenzie

Daily Texan Staff

Print this article

Published: Friday, June 5, 2009

Updated: Friday, June 5, 2009

Spencer Wall

Mary Kang/The Daily Texan

Spencer Wall, fourth-year English and sociology major, talks about her
experience wearing a hijab on Wednesday night at Kerbey Lane Cafe.
Wall, a Christian from West Texas, embarked on a personal experience in
which she dressed as a Muslim woman for a year, starting in April.

I first noticed Spencer Wall in my religion and society class toward
the end of last semester. She wasn’t particularly outspoken, but the
shawl that covered her hair, neck and shoulders made her stand out in
the large class.

I usually gave her nothing more than a completely unconscious
glance. But when she revealed to the class the decision that she made
on April 27, I suddenly became aware of the attention I gave her.

Wall, a 20-year-old sociology and English senior, decided to assume
the characteristics and attire of a “typical” Muslim woman for a year
starting in late April.

She wears the traditional veil, or “hijab,” and loose-fitting
clothing everywhere she goes and does not consume pork or alcohol in
public. She avoids eye and physical contact with men and has adopted
modest habits like walking with her arms glued to her sides or crossed
in front of her to hide her chest. 

I witnessed the looks Wall gets on a daily basis when we met at Kerbey Lane on the Drag recently.  

She’s wearing a hijab splashed with vibrant shades of green and
blue. A long-sleeved, black shirt and floor-length aqua skirt reveals
only a few inches of skin.

 Some who pass us try to be inconspicuous with their intrigue,
limiting themselves to quick side glances. But most don’t even try to
be candid with their exaggerated double-takes or blatant stares.

She passes by a group waiting to be seated, and all of them stare at
the back of her head as she walks away. One guy even rolls his eyes.

“It doesn’t surprise me,” she says when I tell her about the group. “But look around. They’re not the only ones.”

She insists her decision is not a social experiment but more of a
personal learning experience. As a white female from a small, West
Texas town, Wall says she wanted to know what it would be like to be
part of a “noticeable minority.”

“I’m not representing Muslim women or the Muslim community,” she
says. “I just want to know what it’s like to walk in their shoes for a
while.”

Initially, Wall elaborates on her “learning experience” when people
would ask her questions, the most common being “So, where are you
from?” She has abandoned these efforts. Now, when people ask about her
attire, she simply says she is not Muslim but wears the hijab because
she chooses to do so.

This explanation is not entirely untrue, as Wall admits to not being able to leave her home without the clothing. 

“I decided a while ago that I was going to try and not wear the
hijab for 24 hours,” she says. “I couldn’t even make it for half that.”

Wall says she receives different reactions when she wears the hijab.
A man once fell into a display at Wal-Mart because he was staring at
her. One day a group of male patrons at the restaurant where she works
refused to be served by her. The same group called her derogatory
names. But most of the time she said she is just respectfully avoided.

“I wouldn’t say guys don’t hit on me, but they do so in a very
different way now,” she says. “It’s more respectful, less forward.”

The experience has taught Wall to pay attention to smaller details
that would make a traditional Muslim lifestyle difficult to follow in
the United States.

One day at a clothing store, Wall had to ask for a sheet to cover a
gap between the floor and dressing room door so she could hide her bare
legs as she changed. Her job as a waitress presents one of the most
awkward situations as it naturally entails a lot of physical contact
with strangers, which is not allowed for Muslim women, she said. 

Wall has grown to appreciate this sort of privacy and, in some ways,
respect it. Perhaps the most unexpected outcome of the experience is a
newfound devotion to her Christian faith. The Islamic faith requires
followers to pray five times a day, the first prayer being at 5 a.m.
Though Wall has not yet assumed this tradition, she admits she may in
the future, and finds herself praying more often.

“You know we live in a society that is very unconscious of daily
religious activities,” she said. “Throughout this experience, I have
noticed myself becoming much more aware of God.”

Throughout our conversation, I find myself wanting to discuss the
most obvious topic, but can’t bring it up without having to continually
justify myself. Doesn’t she feel constricted and even oppressed by the
practices she is assuming?

Wall’s candidness to discuss such issues validates my impression of
her. She constantly reassures me to ask even the most probing questions
and to present any debate, illustrating a maturity and intelligence
uncommon for a 20-year-old.

“This experience has taught me to respect a woman’s decision to stay
home with her children or wear a hijab or go out and become CEOs,” Wall
said.

She finishes her sentence, as I notice a young woman staring at the back of Wall’s head.

Her eyes momentarily follow the outline of the brightly colored veil
and then quickly move away. Instead of feeling sorry for Wall and
assuming that the attention is warranted by feelings of resentment or
fear, I soon wonder if the girl is instead intrigued by the hijab.

Wall admits to only showing her hair in the most intimate of
settings, and I realize that I’m slightly jealous of someone who
respects something I easily take for granted.

function clearField(el) {
if (el.value == el.defaultValue) el.value = ”;
}

function resetField(el) {
if (el.value == ”) el.value = el.defaultValue;
}

Comments

44 comments

islamvoice

Thu Jun 11 2009 02:59

You look at me and call me oressed
Simply because of the way I’m dressed
You know me not for what’s inside
You judge the clothing I wear with pride
My body’s not for your eyes to hold
You must speak to my mind, not my feminine mold
I’m an individual, I’m no mans slave
It’s Allah’s pleasure that I only crave
I have a voice so I will be heard
For in my heart I carry His word
” O ye women, wrap close your cloak, So you won’t be bothered by ignorant folk”,
Man doesn’t tell me to dress this way
It’s a Law from God that I obey
Oressed is something I’m truly NOT
For liberation is what I’ve got
It was given to me many years ago
With the right to prosper, the right to grow
I can climb mountains or cross the seas
Expand my mind in all degrees
For God Himself gave us LIB-ER-TY
When He sent Islam
To You and Me

islamvoice

Thu Jun 11 2009 01:44

You look at me and call me oressed
Simply because of the way I’m dressed
You know me not for what’s inside
You judge the clothing I wear with pride
My body’s not for your eyes to hold
You must speak to my mind, not my feminine mold
I’m an individual, I’m no mans slave
It’s Allah’s pleasure that I only crave
I have a voice so I will be heard
For in my heart I carry His word
” O ye women, wrap close your cloak, So you won’t be bothered by ignorant folk”,
Man doesn’t tell me to dress this way
It’s a Law from God that I obey
Oressed is something I’m truly NOT
For liberation is what I’ve got
It was given to me many years ago
With the right to prosper, the right to grow
I can climb mountains or cross the seas
Expand my mind in all degrees
For God Himself gave us LIB-ER-TY
When He sent Islam
To You and Me

Juvy

Thu Jun 11 2009 01:02

I disagree with the comment that Muslim women are not allowed to have
physical contact with people . I am a Muslim female doctor, and by
necessity of my profession, I have physical contact with men on a daily
basis! For purposes of my job I also have eye contact with them. Allah
does allow this (special situations) so that women can be free to
practice medicine if they so desired.

Hera

Thu Jun 11 2009 00:22

I would like to see this woman attempt to go without a hijab in an
Islamic country. Pakistan for example. That is an act that requires
real courage, as some women have been disfigured for life in acid
attacks for not being “covered” in Pakistan and some other countries in
the “Islamic world”. Walking around with a hijab on your head in the US
is not particularly heroic.

Adam

Thu Jun 11 2009 00:05

What a beautiful outlook this woman has!


Your name

Wed Jun 10 2009 18:59

Thank you for the prespective, Mrs. Wall!


David Williams

Wed Jun 10 2009 17:17

I think this will prove to be a great eye opening experience for her.
One of the things that makes the human race great is the ability to
empathize with others and have compassion. I believe she is finding out
how great and practical the practices of Islam are and will find a very
strong appreciation for it. Even Christian nun’s cover and are modest
till this day. This is a practice that has been abandoned recently, I
hope that Allah guides her, through this experience to the true path
and know that the main reason for this modesty in Islam is to prevent
unwanted sexual glares and glances, of which people would find interest
in a woman for her body and looks, not for her mind and personality.
This is the greatest form of respecting yourself for a woman in a
society that has began to make it “unnormal” if you don’t show your
skin, cleavage and hair. That beauty of a woman should be only kept for
the one who will be able to act according to witnessing that….her
husband!

Louis Bertmans

Tue Jun 9 2009 03:44

Only in the US (so called free world) this kind of problems exist. In
Europe, we don’t have any issues with women covering their heads or
dressing in any other way.


Lover of Truth

Sun Jun 7 2009 17:40

Keep up the good work Ms. Wall, you are inspiring to all.

renita burwell

Sun Jun 7 2009 16:58

Amen, Shayma. A person’s religion and its practices are not for
outsiders to experiment with just for the sake of curiousity! This is
not a museum! Also I’ve known quite a few Muslims, none ever ran around
with their eyes cast down or folded their arms to hide their body. If
they did cross their arms, it meant they were mad as hell and you had
better run and fast. If Spencer wants to present a more modest
appearance than what is necessary in American society, then let her do
so. But do it in a way that doesn’t make you appear to be something
you’re not.

Nikolai Royas

Sun Jun 7 2009 16:55

i found this story incredibly fascinating. absolutly remarkable. this
young woman should be congradulated on her maturity and forthright
attitude.



Fayzah

Sun Jun 7 2009 00:10

“I just want to know what it’s like to walk in their shoes for a while.”
You’d
be surprised at how many people are open or tolerant toward the idea of
a woman covering herself up. More surprising yet is the level of hatred
people can feel toward a complete stranger because she won’t let you
see her body/hair. What an interesting way to find out for yourself (a
whole year)! I’ve seen something of the like on YouTube; a woman called
the Non-Muslim Hijabi experiments with the veil.
By the way, I’m a Hijaabi AND a Trekkie!

Fayzah

Sat Jun 6 2009 23:19

“I just want to know what it’s like to walk in their shoes for a while.”
You’d
be surprised at how many people are open or tolerant toward the idea of
a woman covering herself up. More surprising yet is the level of hatred
people can feel toward a complete stranger because she won’t let you
see her body/hair. What an interesting way to find out for yourself (a
whole year)! I’ve seen something of the like on YouTube; a woman called
the Non-Muslim Hijabi experiments with the veil.
By the way, I am a Hijaabi AND a Trekkie!

Amane

Sat Jun 6 2009 22:13

You know ,i think what she did was great as for me im a muslim, that is
having a hard time wearing the hijab ,it takes alot .


Are Judaism and Christianity Violent?

Print Send RSS

Have we forgotten Shibli Nomani ?

Have we forgotten Shibli Nomani ?


A Rememberance on his 152nd birth anniversary:

By Kaleem Kawaja,


“Yeh maana tum ko talwaron ki tezi aazmani haiy,

Humari gurdanon pur ho gaa is ka imtihaan kub tuk”

( We know you want to display your military might,

But for how long will it be at our cost.)

………..Shibli Nomnai in “Shahar-e- Aaashob-e-Islam” (The ruined city of Islam” )

In recent years whenever I have enquired from well educated
north-Indian Muslims about Allama Shibli Nomani, they have told me that
I should talk to someone from Azamgarh, because that is where he was
from, and that is where the Shibli Academy and Shibli National College
are located. So recently I traveled to Azamgarh, visited both
institutions and Shibli’s grave there and talked to a few of Shibli’s
descendents. What I discovered is that despite his awesome services and
contribution in furthering the causes of the Indian nation, the culture
and heritage of the Musalmans of South Asia and his yeoman services in
spreading education in the community, the Qaum has relegated him as a
remote figure in the pages of history. Further some people do grave
injustice when they say that Shibli was a personality largely from
Azamgarh and easten U.P.

The fact is that from the young age of 25 Shibli lived away from
Azamgarh, serving in institutions all over the country and abroad and
returned to live in Azamgarh only a couple of years before his untimely
death at age 57 in 1914. It is injustice to Shibli that the Aligarh
Muslim University, Nadvat ul Uloom and Osmania University where Shibli
spent thirty-one years of his life have done little to retain his
memory. Next only to Sir Syed Ahmad Khan, Shibli was a crusading
pioneer in the Aligarh movement to spread modern education in the
Muslim qaum that was badly ravaged by the 1957 war of independence.
Indeed Shibli, who was a child of India’s first war of independence,
was born on June 3, 1857 in Azamgarh.

Shibli completed his education in fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), Usul
(Islamic principles), Hadith (traditions of prophet Mohammad), Munazra
(comparative religious debate), Maqulat (rational science) and
astronomy under illustrious scholars like Maulana Farooq Chiryakoti,
Hakim Abdullah Jairajpuri and Maulana Irshad Hussain of Rampur. Shibli
began his career by first working as a lawyer in Azamgarh and Jaunpur.
But starting in 1878 Shibli was increasingly drawn to scholarship,
comprising of learning and teaching. Thus he started writing discourses
in ‘Awadh Panch’ and ‘Payam-e-yaar’, two contemporary newspapers of
U.P. that talked of retaining the established values of the Muslim
society.

At Aligarh College:

In 1881 Shibli visited Aligarh to meet Sir Syed Ahmed Khan.
Subsequently as the then Anglo-Mohammedan Oriental College , then also
known as ‘Madrasat al uloom Musalman’ needed a teacher for Eastern
languages, Shibli applied for the position. Shibli’s interview for that
position by Sir Syed Ahmad Khan is an interesting anecdote. On the day
of his interview Shibli was asked to seat himself in the college’s
library. In the library Shibli found that the book-shelves were
unlocked and a few chairs were placed; he proceeded to browse through
the books. The whole day passed but Sir Syed never came. Instead he
sent word to Shibli to come to the library the next day. Again on the
next day Shibli waited, browsing through books the entire day but again
Sir Syed never came. Instead he again sent word to Shibli to come the
next day. The same occurred on the third day. At the end of the third
day, Sir Syed came to the library and told Shibli, “ Maulvi Shibli, the
interview is over, go and start your teaching work”. On February 1,
1883, at the young age of twentyfive Shibli was appointed Assistant
professor of Arabic and Persian at a monthly salary of forty rupees.
Two years later he was promoted as professor and his monthly salary
increased to seventy rupees.

Thus began the father-son like partnership of Shibli Nomani with Sir
Syed Ahmad Khan who was forty years older than Shibli, to develop the
Anglo Mohammedan college to impart modern education to the Mussalmans
of India. Shibli was immensely popular among the students at Aligarh;
some of them being Maulana Zafar Ali Khan, Mohammad Nazir, Sajjad
Haider yaldram, Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar. Soon Shibli became the
first editor of the Urdu version of Aligarh Institute Gazette. He
brought in distinguished writers of the period like Altaf Hussain Hali
and Munshi Mohammad Zakaullah. In the events at the college, Shibli
often spoke eloquently about the crestfallen position of Muslims and
the importance of the Aligarh movement. To raise funds for the nascent
college he will often participate in events along with Thomas Arnold,
Kennedy, Smith, Anthony and Yusuf Vakil. At Aligarh he also established
students’ societies like ‘Akhwan ul safa’ and ‘Lajinatul Adab’.

Shibli Steps Out

In 1892 Shibli took leave from the Aligarh College and left for a
six month travel through various countries in the middleeast. In this
travel Shibli visited Aden, Syria, Cyprus, Turkey, Istanbul, Jerusalem,
Beirut and Cairo. He met luminaries like Saiyad Tahir, Maulana Ali
Pasha, Sheikh Abduh, Sheikh Hamza Fathullah, Syed Raza Misri among
others. In these countries he studied the system of education in a
variety of madrasas and colleges and became familiar with the
literature of those countries. Upon his return from this travel Shibli
introduced common boarding houses, common dining halls and uniform
dress for students at the Aligarh school.

Also upon his return the British Indian government awarded Shibli
with the honorific title of ‘Shams ul Ulema’. Shibli was also appointed
a fellow of the then illustrious Allahabad University, member of the
Bombay branch of Royal Asiatic Society, and he attended the Government
Oriental conference in Shimla (1910), and the Coronation Durbar (1911)
where he was introduced to King George V. In 1912 the Indian Government
accepted many of Shibli’s recommendations for the reform of the
syllabus in schools.

In Hyderabad and Turkey

In 1901 the Nizam of Hyderabad invited Shibli to Hyderabad to help
set up the syllabus and systems at the new Oriental university that in
time grew into the Osmania University. Shibli wrote the plan for the
university entitled ‘Hyderabad ki mashraqi universirty’. In Hyderabad
Shibli was appointed the secretary of Education and Arts at a monthly
salary of five hundred rupees. In this position in Hyderabad, Shibli
completed many works such as Al Ghazali (1902), Ibn al Kalam (1903),
Sawaneh Maulana Rumi (1904). Also during his stay in Hyderabad he
composed ‘Sher al Ajam’ and ‘Muwaznah Anis o Dabir’.

In 1913 Shibli was invited by the Ottoman Sultan of Turkey to develop the text books for the proposed university at Madina.

Shbli departs Aligarh for Nadvat ul Uloom, Lucknow

Despite his long and dedicated service to the Aligarh College, in
the late 1890s Shibli started getting uncomfortable with uncontrolled
modernity at the college. In fact Sir Syed himself was uncomfortable
with the growth of over-anglicized trends at the Aligarh College. It is
said that Sir Syed’s appointment of his son Syed Mahmood, a highly
anglicized person as his successor as the secretary of the Aligarh
Education Society, in preference to several of his staunch colleagues
like Maulvi Samiullah, Karamat Hussain, Shibli Nomani etal led to a
situation where several of these luminaries left the Aligarh college
ultimately. It is said that a fortnight before his death in 1898 a
major quarrel occurred between Sir Syed and his son Syed Mahmood due to
the later’s very anglicized lifestyle, that caused Sir Syed to move out
of the house and start living with his friend Haji Ismail Khan, where
he soon breathed his last.

In 1896 Shibli first expressed a desire to leave the Aligarh college
but was persuaded by the principal of the college, Theodore Beck to
stay. Finally after the death of Sir Syed Shibli Nomani resigned from
the Aligarh college in 1899. It was in 1905 after return from Hyderabad
that Shibli Nomani joined Nadvat ul Uloom at Lucknow as the secretary
of the institution. As at other institutions, Shibli threw himself with
all his zeal to build Nadva into a quality institution and introduced
new subjects and curriculum. He also started the journal Al Nadva that
revolutionized the thinking of Ulema and broadened their outlook. At
Nadva some of Shibli’s distinguished students were: Saiyed Sulaiman
Nadvi, Maulana Abdul Majid Daryabadi, Maulana Masud Nadvi – the same
people who later gave concrete shape to Shibli’s dream of Dar ul
Muannifin at Azamgarh.

It was during his decade long sojourn at Nadva that Shibli visited
Bombay and the nearby princely state of Janjirah in 1907. That is where
he wrote the classic ‘Sher al ajam’, the history of the Persian poetry,
and his treatise on ‘Islam and tolerance’.

However some of his critics at Nadva opposed Shibli for the modern
syllabus that he institutionalized there as too modern. In fact for
some of his compositions in ‘al Kalam’ some of his opponents charged
him even with apostasy, just as Sir Syed Ahmad Khan was similarly
charged for his Aligarh College movement. It is an irony that at the
Aligarh college some of Shibli’s critics considered him as too
conservative, while at Nadva some of his critics considered him a
radical. Finally in 1913 Shibli Nomani resigned and left from Nadva
after a decade of dedicated service to the institution.

Shibli and Maulana Azad

It was during his stay in Bombay that Shibli Nomani met the then
youthful Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, who was then the editor of the Urdu
journal ‘Lisan-ul-sidq’. Soon Shibli and Azad became close friends and
colleagues and Azad spent some time at Nadva. Shibli invited Azad to
join him in writing the magnum opus ‘Sirat ul Nabi’, considered Shibli
Nomani’s landmark achievement, even though he did not live long enough
to complete it. Such was Azad’s devotion to Shibli that after Shibli’s
death when Syed Sulaiman Nadvi asked Azad if he will like to serve as a
honorary fellow at the Dar ul Musannifin, Azad is reported to have
said: “ I will willingly serve even as a porter”.

Shibli returns home to Dar ul Musannifin, Azamgarh

In 1913 at the age of fiftysix, after being away from his hometown
of Azamgarh for thirtyone years, and having lived and worked all over
India and having travelled abroad extensively, Shibli Nomani returned
to settle down in Azamgarh. In Azamgarh he soon established Dar ul
Musannifin (abode of writers) – that is today also known as Shibli
Academy. In the short time before his death in November 1914, despite
poor health Shibli did much to give a concrete shape to the new
institution. It is a tribute to Shibli’s illustrious life and work that
his students built his dream institution into a major center of
learning and research related to Islam, Islamic civilization,
Indo-Islamic culture and the Indian culture itself.

Shibli’s legacy

Shibli Nomani was a visionary and a restless soul who travelled wide
and lived in places remote from his home in pursuit of learning,
spreading knowledge, building institutions and bringing about a
revolution in the thinking of Ulema, learened scholars and ordinary
Muslims. Shibli was one of the most ardent nationalists devoted to his
nation and to freeing it from the yoke of colonialism. At the Aligarh
college he dedicated himself to providing modern education to Muslims.
His letters to sir syed Ahmad Khan from Istanbul, Cairo and other
places show his deep concern that Muslims study sciences. He admitted
the importance of Western learning but was not prepared to ignore
oriental subjects or belittle the merit of Islamic sciences. He
disagreed with those who wanted to emulate the western ethos so much
that it could destroy the identity of Muslims.

Shibli’s spirit of national integration is demonstrated by the
manner in which he established a school in 1883 in his hometown of
Aligarh, and named it ‘National School’; it is now a large
post-graduate college with an enrollment of about 9,000 students. He
instructed that the students in this school speak English language by
the time they reach Standard V. A century ago Shibli was of the opinion
that much of the Muslim antipathy to Western learning arose because of
their ignorance of European languages. He was not satisfied with mere
writing, learning and attending conferences, but also believed in
action. For example when in 1912 Burn, the chief secretary of United
Provinces government initiated a move to introduce Urdu in Devnagri
script, Shibli opposed it stoutly and fought for the preservation of
Urdu in Nastaliq script. Also in 1912 he introduced a resolution in
Delhi demanding withdrawl of books that created discord among Indians
of diverse faiths from schools and colleges.

Shibli praised the Congress party for raising the demand of
self-government. While Shibli believed that the Congress party may not
best represent the interests of the Muslim community, at the same time
he dismissed the claims of Muslim League as the exclusive
representative of Muslims. He did not subscribe to the fears expressed
by Muslim League that by virtue of their numerical superiority Hindus
would overwhelm Muslims. Indeed men like Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar
and Maulana Azad who were Shibli’s close younger colleagues and who
were considerably influenced by Shibli may be viewed as his political
successors.

Have we forgotten Shibli?

In the aftermath of Shibli Nomani’s death his favourite pupil
including the renowned Syed Sulaiman Nadvi, dedicated themselves to
nurturing and building on his legacy. Syed Sulaiman Nadvi completed
Shibli’s unfinished ‘Seerat un Nabi’ and together with others built Dar
ul Musannifin in Azamgarh into a most illustrious institution of
learning, research and publications in the area of Islamic thought and
civilization that it became in the next few decades.

However, after 1947 Shibli Nomani’s name has suffered neglect by
people outside his close circle and outside the Muslim community of
Eastern U.P. For instance the Muslim qaum has not given Shibli the
all-India stature that others like Sir Syed Ahmad Khan, Maulana
Mohammad Ali Jauhar, Maulana Azad with whom he cam be easily ranked
among the Muslim luminaries of the last 150 years. Aligarh Muslim
University and Nadvat ul Uloom, Lucknow, the two institutions that he
served for so long with so much untiring zeal and devotion and where he
made so much contribution have not done much to perpetuate his memory.

It was only recently that Aligarh Muslim University built a students
hostel in his name; but they did not name any of their better
institutes, eg the library or one of the colleges after Shibli.
Similarly Nadvat ul Uloom did not name any of its significant organs
after him. Hardly any Muslim community university has named any major
awards in Shibli’s name. And hardly any alumni of AMU memorialize
Shibli by organizing annual lectures in his memory. The unkindest cut
is that when you enquire about Shibli from north Indian Muslims they
indicate that he is a historical figure from eastern UP and Azamgarh.
This despite the fact that Shibli spent 31 of his 57 years serving
educational institutions of the Muslims all over India, away from his
home base. Today we need to make up for lost time and take steps to
give Shibli a place of pride among the all-India luminaries of the
Muslim qaum of the last two centuries.

_________________________________________________

The writer a community activist in Washington DC, can be reached on kaleem kawaja@hotmail.com

Link:

http://www.shibliacademy.org/

Malegaon 06’ blast accused being coerced to turn approver

 | TwoCircles.net
Malegaon 06’ blast accused being coerced to turn approver
Submitted by admin4 on 3 June 2009 – 11:12am.

* Crime/Terrorism
* Indian Muslim

By TwoCircles.net Staff Correspondent,

Mumbai: Abrar Ahmed is one of the accused in the September 2006 Malegaon blast case. He turned approver but only to turn hostile later alleging he was being pressurized to give testimony against the rest eight Muslim accused in the case. Seemingly not ready to face the new turn in the case, Maharashtra Anti Terrorism Squad is reportedly pressurizing Abrar, and his family also, to again turn approver. Part of the tactic, some plain-clothed policemen yesterday brutally beat up his nephew who had gone to meet him in Byculla Central Jail.

Abrar turned hostile this April and through his brother Advocate Jaleel Ahmed filed an affidavit wherein he alleged that some officials were pressurizing him to give testimony against the accused in the case. In the affidavit he leveled serious charges against Rajwardhan, then Superintendent of Police (Nashik Rural), and few other police and Anti Terrorism Squad (ATS) officials. He alleged that SP Rajvardhan was involved in hatching the conspiracy to implicate Muslim youths. Soon after the affidavit, the police allegedly started putting pressure on him and his family to turn him approver again.

On June 1 Advocate Jaleel’s son Aftab Ahmed had gone to meet his uncle Abrar lodged in Byculla Central Jail in Nagpada, Mumbai. He was not allowed to meet him, and when he came out of the jail compound, some plain-clothed ATS men pounced on him and brutally beat him, says Urdu Times daily.

Advocate Jaleel, who had prepared his brother Abrar’s affidavit, has been quoted by the daily as saying: Yesterday my son went to meet his uncle Abrar Ahmad. Not allowed to meet, Aftab went out of the jail compound to the Clear Road where some policemen in plain clothes asked him whether he was son of advocate Jaleel. When Aftab said, ‘yes’ they started beating him and dragged him into a van. However, Aftab managed to get rid of them.

Jaleel alleged that since the affidavit was filed the police have been troubling Abrar to make him withdraw the affidavit. To put Abrar under pressure the relatives also are being threatened. Jaleel added that the policemen while beating Aftab were saying, ‘You and your father are daring Rajwardhan (SP). We won’t spare you.’

He also said that his son was so brutally beaten that he is not in a position to face his viva voce scheduled on June 3.

On September 8, 2006 Malegaon was shattered with a series of blasts taking place at Bada Qabrastan and Mushawarat Chowk on the day of Shab-e-Barat after Friday prayers. The explosions that claimed 31 lives and injured more than 250 persons were allegedly attributed to some alleged SIMI outfit. The ATS arrested nine Muslim youths and imposed MCOCA on them.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is conducting probe in the case and it is delaying submission of its report, reportedly due to a petition pending in the Supreme Court challenging the MCOCA against the accused.
Why indian muslims killing muslims in bomb blast
Submitted by Pushkar (not verified) on 3 June 2009 – 12:52pm.

Looking at all blast across main cities like jaipur,mumbai,bangalore,delhi,surat,malegoan,karnavati all muslims youths were involved belonging to SIMI &amp; IM. WHy muslims are killing muslims?? WHy they are killing innocent people in the name of allah?? can somebody from community denounce this &amp; stop talibanisation of india

* reply

Wake up Mr. Pushkar
Submitted by Moash (not verified) on 4 June 2009 – 2:40pm.

Mr. Pushkar, May be you are sleeping, or pretending to be so. May be you doesn’t read the news daily. Who issued fatwa condemning the terrorist activities from Deoband. In Delhi also Muslim Ulema issued fatwa against such activities, for what purpose the learned ones from the Muslim community assembled in Hyderabad at end of the last year? In which swamis from the Hindu community also participate. How often do we ask Hindus to condemn violence against Christians? Terrorists are terrorists. There are no Muslim terrorists, Hindu terrorists or Christian terrorists. This is a term that was coined by US, for their own reasons. Why IRA terrorists are not called Christian terrorists? What would you call LTTE terrorists? Why only Muslim leaders should be required to condemn perpetrators of violence. We as a society must realise two things. Number one…Please do not assign religion to terrorists…they are criminals and need to be treated as such. Secondly let us not jump to conclusions. If police takes years to arrest terrorists, how can we in seconds confirm that arrested individuals are terrorists? Emotional knee jerk reactions will not help in curbing criminal activities. It is too serious an issue to be treated so trivially.
Is it Indian Christians, Indian Muslims or the Hindus who are giving India bad publicity?
Hindutva Hindus who are enraged need only answer the question:
Is it Indian Christians, Indian Muslims or the Hindus who are giving India bad publicity?
Who burnt a Christian missionary and his son, both of who were serving the poorest Hindus? It was the Hindus.
Who attacked Christians and intimidated them in Dangs? Who mobilized kar sevak mobs when they feared losing the Gujarat elections?
Who organized a pogrom in which 2000 Muslims were killed, women were raped, and where a pregnant woman’s womb was cut and the foetus was speared with a trishul? It is always the Hindus in India who indulge in this barbarity and go scot free.
India can only become a major nation if the majority community has some qualities. Such actions put into doubt whether the Hindus are fit to lead India.
If you read, Pitts letter to Rice, it says that (1) Hindu extremists have persecuted Christians (2) conducted a pogrom against Muslims in which 2000 were killed and (3) propagated Nazism in schools through textbooks.
So who has disgraced India?
Which Indian Christian or Muslim is accused of such criminality?

* reply

Dear Pushkar, its not yet
Submitted by Bal Thackeray (not verified) on 4 June 2009 – 10:19am.

Dear Pushkar, its not yet proved that Muslim youths were involved in those blast,but the new findings have found that Hindu terrorists were involved in all those blasts.Now you know why HINDU TERRORIST ARE KILLING INNOCENT PEOPLE.AND PLEASE,CAN SOMEBODY FROM UR COMMUNITY,DENOUNCE THIS AND STOP TALIBANISATION OF INDIA.
AND MY REQUEST TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, TO BAN ALL SANGH PARIVAR OUTFITS AT THE EARLIEST AND HANG THESE HINDU TERRORIST.JAIHIND.

* reply

Pushkar Sharm se kaho ham Hindutva Hindu hain
Submitted by Anti Chaddhiwala (not verified) on 4 June 2009 – 7:12am.

Pushkar, most of your postings are incomprehensible ! Drunk on gomutra perhaps ?

The rest of the world eats your god, the cow, and is none the worse for it.

Pushkar, I do not hate Hindus, I have contempt for Hindutva Hindus.

It is evident that not all Hindus are reactionary.

I can see the difference between you and Hindutva Hindus for instance.

Hindutva Hindus have felt they can attack minorities. I can dish it out to them in return – and make them cry in public

Pushkar, name me the RSS leader who went to prison for India’s freedom.

Vajpayee was an RSS fellow and he was arrested during a demonstration where he was a spectator. He obtained his release by naming the freedom fighters, who were then caught and imprisoned.

Laloo made the quip in the Parliamentary debate after Vajpayee was sworn in “All the previous PMs of India went to prison for India’s freedom, but Vajpayee was the first PM to send Indians to prison for his own freedom !!!”

Godse was a m
ember of the RSS and he had to be hanged.

Savarkar of the HM escaped on a technicality. So what are you talking about Pushkar ?

The RSS has an inferiority complex about it, so they claim they were against Nehru, but they were with Gandhi and Bose !!!

Pushkar, I have never persecuted any Hindu, and the party I support has not done this either. I have not branded anyone untouchable, or prevented him from drawing water. I have not joined a mob to lynch any Hindus.

I observe Brahmins have persecuted Indians by labelling the majority as untouchable. The concept of equality is unknown to him. The Muslims and British brought the concept of equality.

So why don’t you start with the Brahmin ? He is responsible for India’s degradation.

Pushkar, I do love saffron jokers !

Read RSS pamphlets for the news and live in make-believe Hindu world !

After 60 years of independence, one has to conclude that the Hindus do not have what it takes to transform India. The Mughal empire was famous through out the world, and so was the British empire. Both the Mughals and the British left a lasting impact on India. The Hindus are too wracked with self-doubt, they wallow in self-pity and they are intrinscially divisive to lead India. The last comes from their caste system.

Observing all these Hindutva jokers here one can see in their hearts they also feel the same way. They are just venting their frustrations because in their hearts, they realise the inadequacies of the Hindus.

Can one conclude that due to the bad karma notched up by Advani and Modi, the BJP could not win ? It seems to be the obvious conclusion, but as usual you look for something devious.

Who is this famous journalist ? Is he a Brahmin astrologer ?

According to your joker, there is something wrong with India – all these blasts happining in the last few years for example ! Karkare found that ugly, saffron sadhvis and purohits were planting bombs and blaming others. So the Hindus came to realise the BJP was taking them for a ride. All the BJP wants is power, and for that they will not only massacre minorities, but they will have Hindus killed as well.

Pushkar, under Aurangazeb, the Mughal empire had the largest land mass of any that ruled India. At that time, the empire included what is today Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. By the time the British came, the empire had fragmented and was a collection of principalities. They reunited it, but Afganistan never became part of the empire. The Mughals always strove to unite India under central rule from Delhi – that is a concept that emanated from them. The British and Hindus inherited the concept from them. It is a fact that the advent of Hindu rule led to break-up. The Hindu mentality is intrinscially divisive and you are the proof.

The BJP Hindus are even worse. Their predecessors, the RSS and the Hindu Mahasabha, created an environment that made partition inevitable. India had a larger territorial mass under the Muslims and the British. India shrunk on the advent of Hindu rule. Is it not proof of your incompetence ? And if matters are left to the BJP, civil war and further break up would be inevitable.

* reply

Pushkar, I think you have
Submitted by Ravi (not verified) on 4 June 2009 – 5:53am.

Pushkar,

I think you have the wrong idea. Many muslim organisations have already denounced these attacks not only against muslims but against all indians.

The problem is that these attacks don’t invovle SIMI or IM but hindu taliban organisations like abhinav bharat, bajrang dal and RSS who want to start hindu-muslim riots and benefit from it.

Yes somebody from the community must denounce the HINDU TALIBANISATION of India. Its about time! So tell me are you denouncing these groups?!