Peace Homes Aluva

Simplify Building Your Dream Home

Archives July 2009

SC judge apologises for ‘Taliban’ remarks on Muslims

SC judge apologises for ‘Taliban’ remarks on Muslims

New
Delhi: Under criticism from Mulsim groups, Supreme Court judge Justice
Markandeya Katju apologised for his controversial comments that Muslim
students cannot insist on sporting beards as it would lead to
‘Talibanisation’ of the country.

A bench of Justices
R V Raveendran and Markandeya Katju also withdrew the order passed by
it on March 30 in which it had dismissed the petition filed by a
student challenging the directive of a convent school in Madhya Pradesh
that Muslims cannot sport beard.

“During the hearing, certain
observations were made by one of us (Justice Markandeya Katju). His
intentions were not to offend anyone. However, if any one’s feeling has
been hurt, he apologises and expresses regret in the matter,” the bench
said in an order.

The apex court said since the petitioner
Mohd Saleem had expressed apprehension that one of the judges (Katju)
was biased it was requesting the Chief Justice of India to place the
matter before another bench for hearing.

Source: Agencies

German killing of headscarved woman at court raises fears in Europe

The killing of the Muslim woman raises many questions regarding inter-racial relationships and co-existence in Europe.
Monday, 06 July 2009 13:15
World Bulletin / News Desk


European Muslims faced another hate crime with killing of a headscarved woman by a German man in a court room on on July 1st, German and Egyptian media reported.

 A 28-year old German man stabbed Egyptian national Marwa Sherbini 18 times in Dresden courthouse before she gives evidence against court appeal.

Marwa Sherbini, a 32-year-old Egyptian national was suing her attacker after he insulted her for wearing the Islamic headscarf.

Sherbini stood in court to give evidence against court appeal before German man took out a knife and stabbed her 18 times.

Marwa took her 3-year old son Mostapha to play in a Dresden park. A German man, identified only as Axel W, insulted her because of wearing headscarf and called her a “terrorist”. She filed a case against him in German courts after the incident.

When she won the case and the court fined him the €780 for having abused her. But German man appealed against the verdict, German media said.

Also, her husband and her son were present in the court room. When the assailant attacked Marwa her husband ran to rescue her. But the assailant stabbed him 3 times. Meanwhile, a German security officer in court shot the husband in the leg too.

The husband Elwy Okaz lapsed into a coma and was taken to hospital suffering from serious injuries to the stomach and liver.

Marwa Sherbini was a star pupil at her Alexandria School, El Nasr Girls’ College (EGC), one of the oldest and most prestigious educational establishments for girls in Alexandria. Her personality and academic achievements led to her selection as Head Girl of the school before she joined the Faculty of Pharmacy at Alexandria University, graduating in 2000 with flying colors. After she got married to Elwy Okaz, a researcher at the Max Planck Institute, she moved with him to Germany.

Crime ignored

The killing of the Muslim woman raises many questions regarding inter-racial relationships and co-existence in Europe.

It’s been too long since Egyptian bloggers came together under the same opinion. But the new hate crime that took place in Germany against Sherbini, was one good reason for them to unite again, condemning international media for ignoring such incidents against Muslims in the West.

German officials did not acknowleged about bloody event which is taken in front of the 3 year old son’s eyes during 24 hours and did not informed Marva’s family or Egyptian embassy..

According to father of MArwa who spoked to an Egyptian TV, they learned the killing from a family friend after on a phone conversation after 24 hours.

“My daughter was pregnant in her third month,” the heartbroken mother told Egypt’s Al-Masri Al-Youm daily on Sunday, July 5.

“I never imagined she would be a victim of terrorism and we would see her pictures in the media.”

Also, the media reported that German officials put the son of Sherbinis, Mostafa in an orphanage, rejecting to hand him over Egyptian embassy for send him to family members.

The state-owned Egyptian Gazette reported the hate crime as saying the attacker stabbed Sherbini “shortly before she was to give evidence in an appeal lodged by the man against a conviction for insulting her over wearing the hijab.”

“The investigation into this bloody crime is bound to show there are some indications the suspect was hostile toward foreigners – the signs are there,” said Saxony police chief Bernd Merbitz told German media.

Africom’s Covert War in Sudan

Africom’s Covert War in Sudan

I
recently received a phone call from an Australian man who identified
himself as an investigator for the prosecutor at the International
Criminal Court (ICC) at the Hague, Netherlands. The investigator and
his colleague had read my story, “Merchant’s of Death: Exposing Corporate Financed Holocaust in Africa,”
and wanted my cooperation to provide more detailed evidence about the
warlords behind the massacres at Bogoro, Congo, described briefly in my
story.

After some weeks of back and forth discussions and me revisiting
notes and photos to see what I had, I sent them an e-mail at the
definitive moment when they were hoping to receive a brief “dossier”
about the specific case — which they said “had generated a lot of
interest” at the ICC — and I shared my uncertainty about the ethics of
collaborating with an “International Criminal Court” that was only
indicting black Africans. I indicated my concern for the witness
‘Sandrine,’ a young girl discussed in my story who named names of
commanders, dates of executions, and who herself used a machete in an
ethnic massacre and was raped by militiamen. I noted that witnesses
identified for the Rwandan Tribunal (ICTR) had been murdered or
mysteriously disappeared, and noted my awareness of the injustice of
the Tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda, and the disconcerting
trajectory of the ICC.

I told them I couldn’t in good conscience help them, it seemed,
until the ICC arrested some of the white-collar war criminals running
loose around the world. It was the right decision, in light of the
recent ICC indictments against another black man, and an Arab at that.
It was a very stupid career move, some one else remarked.

On 4 March 2009 the ICC prosecutors announced that they were at last
issuing the long-threatened but first ever indictments against a
sitting head of state, Omar al-Bashir, the Arab President of Sudan.
Meanwhile, Somali ‘pirates’ off East Africa recently freed a Ukrainian
ship with a Panamanian registration, a Ukrainian crew and flag of
Belize. The freighter carried tanks, rockets and munitions destined for
Darfur, and is owned by an Israeli ‘businessman’ and reputed MOSSAD
operative named Vadim Alperin.

It is difficult to make sense of the war in Darfur — especially when
people see it as a one-sided “genocide” of Arabs against blacks that is
being committed by the Bashir ‘regime’ — but such is the establishment
propaganda. The real story is much more expansive, more complex, and it
revolves around some relatively unknown but shady characters. What
follows is a short and imperfect summary of some of the deeper
geopolitical realities behind the struggle for Sudan.

THE POLITICS OF WAR CRIMES

First note that the ICC can now be viewed as a tool of hegemonic
U.S. foreign policy, where the weapons deployed by the U.S. and its
allies include the accusations of, and indictments for, human rights
violations, war crimes and crimes against humanity. To understand this,
we can ask why no white man has yet been charged with these or other
offenses at the ICC, which now holds five black African “warlords” and
seeks to incarcerate and bring to trial another black man, also an
Arab, Omar Bashir. Why hasn’t George W. Bush been indicted? Or what
about Donald Rumsfeld? Dick Cheney? Henry Kissinger? Ehud Olmert? Tony
Blair? Vadim Alperin? John Bredenkamp?

Following on the heels of the announcement that the ICC handed down
seven war crimes charges against al-Bashir, a story broadcast over all
the Western media system and into every American living room by day’s
end, President al-Bashir ordered the expulsion of ten international
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) operating in Darfur under the
pretense of being purely ‘humanitarian’ organizations.

What has not been reported anywhere in the English press is that the
United States of America has just stepped up its ongoing war for
control of Sudan and her resources: petroleum, copper, gold, uranium,
fertile plantation lands for sugar and gum Arabic (essential to Coke,
Pepsi and Ben & Jerry’s ice cream). This war has been playing out
on the ground in Darfur through so-called ‘humanitarian’ NGOs, private
military companies, ‘peacekeeping’ operations and covert military
operations backed by the U.S. and its closest allies.

However, the U.S. war for Sudan has always revolved around
‘humanitarian’ operations — purportedly neutral and presumably
concerned only about protecting innocent human lives — that often
provide cover for clandestine destabilizing activities and
interventions.

Americans need to recognize that the Administration of President
Barack Obama has begun to step up the war for control of Sudan in
keeping with the permanent warfare agenda of both Republicans and
Democrats. The current destabilization of Sudan mirrors the illegal
covert guerrilla war carried out in Rwanda — also launched and supplied
from Uganda — from October 1990 to July 1994. The Rwandan Defense
Forces (then called the Rwandan Patriotic Army) led by Major General
Paul Kagame achieved the U.S. objective of a coup d’etat in Rwanda
through that campaign, and President Kagame has been a key interlocutor
in the covert warfare underway in Darfur, Sudan.

During the Presidency of George W. Bush, the U.S. Government was
involved with the intelligence apparatus of the Government of Sudan
(GoS). At the same time, other U.S. political and corporate factions
were pressing for a declaration of genocide against the GoS. Now, given
the shift of power and the appointment of top Clinton officials
formerly involved in covert operations in Rwanda, Uganda, Congo and
Sudan during the Clinton years, pressure has been applied to heighten
the campaign to destabilize the GoS, portrayed as a ‘terrorist’ Arab
regime, but an entity operating outside the U.S.-controlled banking
system. The former campaign saw overt military action with the U.S.
military missile attacks against the Al-Shifa Pharmaceutical factory in
Sudan (1998); this was an international war crime by the Clinton
Administration and it involved officials now in power.

The complex geopolitical struggle to control Sudan manifests through
the flashpoint war for Darfur and it involves such diverse factions as
the Lord’s Resistance Army, backed by Khartoum, which is also connected
to the wars in the Congo and northern Uganda. Chad is involved, Eritrea
and Ethiopia, Germany, the Central African Republic, Libya, France,
Israel, China, Taiwan, South Africa and Rwanda. There are U.S. special
forces on the ground in the frontline states of Chad, Uganda, Ethiopia,
Kenya, and the big questions are: [1] How many of the killings are
being committed by U.S. proxy forces and blamed on al-Bashir and the
GoS? And [2] who funds, arms and trains the rebel insurgents

UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVASTATION

Rebels? Insurgents? The drumbeat of western propaganda portrays the
conflict as a one-sided affair: a “genocidal counter-insurgency by the
GoS” — in the words of Eric Reeves — versus the good Samaritans of the
‘humanitarian’ NGO community . . . and throw in a few (non-descript)
rebels.

“Sudan ordered at least 10 humanitarian groups expelled from Darfur
on Wednesday after the International Criminal Court issued an arrest
warrant for the country’s president,” wrote Associated Press reporter
Ellen M. Lederer. “Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said the action
‘represents a serious setback to lifesaving operations in Darfur’ and
urged Sudan to reverse its decision, U.N. deputy spokeswoman Marie
Okabe said.”

However, when Ban Ki-moon met with Rwandan strongman Paul Kagame
recently, he never called for Kagame’s arrest, no matter the findings
of two international courts of law that have issued indictments against
top RPA officials. Instead Ban Ki-moon praised Kagame and called for
African countries to hunt down and arrest Hutu people purportedly
involved in the now specious ‘genocide’ in Rwanda in 1994.

The non-governmental aid groups ordered out of Darfur by President
al-Bashir on March 4 were Oxfam, CARE, MSF-Holland, Mercy Corps, Save
the Children, the Norwegian Refugee Council, the International Rescue
Committee, Action Contre la Faim, Solidarites and CHF International.

Of course, the western media is all over the expulsion of any big
‘humanitarian’ moneymaker from Darfur — the moral outrage is so thick
you can almost wipe it. The NGOs and the press that peddles their
images of suffering babes complain that hundreds of thousands of
innocent refugees will now be subjected to massive unassisted suffering
— as opposed to the assisted suffering they previously faced — but
never asks with any serious and honest zeal, why and how the displaced
persons and refugees came to be displaced or homeless to begin with.
Neither do they ask about all the money, intelligence sharing, deal
making, and collaboration with private or governmental military
agencies.

Large ‘humanitarian’ NGOs (and ‘conservation’ NGOs) operate as de facto
multinational corporations revolving around massive private profits and
human suffering. In places like the Democratic Republic of Congo,
Uganda and Darfur these NGOs also provide infrastructure, logistical
and intelligence collaboration that supports U.S. military and
government agendas in the region. Most are aligned with big
foundations, corporate sponsors and USAID — itself a close and
long-time partner for interventions with AFRICOM and the Pentagon.

Refugees and displaced populations are strategic tools of statecraft
and foreign policy, just as ‘humanitarian’ NGOs consistently use food
as a weapon and populations as human shields. The history of the U.S.
covert war in South Sudan is rich with examples of the SPLA and its
‘humanitarian’ partners, especially Christian ‘charities’, committing
such war crimes and crimes against humanity.1

CARE International has received funding from Lockheed Martin
Corporation, the world’s largest and most secretive producer of weapons
of mass destruction, and both CARE and Save the Children are tied up
with weapons and extractive industries in other ways. A peek at the
board of directors of Save the Children makes it clear why the U.S.
media is so devoid of truth about Darfur. Similarly, the International
Rescue Committee does not work with refugees, per se, but serves as a
policy and pressure group involved in funneling private profits from
the west back to the west. The IRC has also been cited for involvement
in military operations in the Democratic Republic of Congo and it has
deep ties to people like Henry Kissinger.

The AID (read: misery) industry in Sudan was by the mid-1990s the
largest so-called ‘humanitarian’ enterprise on the planet, Operation
Lifeline Sudan (OLS) — a form of managed inequality and a temporary and
mobile economy of white privilege, adventurism and, of course, good
will (sic). The misery industry shifted its focus from South Sudan to
Darfur after a pseudo peace ‘treaty’ was organized to end the decades
old war between the SPLA and GoS; the U.S. and Israel backed the SPLA
from 1990 onward, and continue to do so at present. The result of more
than 12 years of illegal U.S. covert low-intensity warfare in Sudan
resulted in the creation of the independent and sovereign state of
South Sudan in circa 2005 — a state dominated by Jewish and Christian
faith-based interests and western multinational corporations.

Much of the AID infrastructure in Sudan has at one time or another
been used as a weapon through the use of human shields, food deliveries
to refugee populations inseparable from insurgents, and shipments of
weapons by ‘humanitarian’ NGOs. This is both incidental and deliberate
policy. Christian ‘relief’ NGOs played a huge role in supporting the
covert western insurgency in South Sudan. One notable ‘humanitarian’
NGO involved in weapons deliveries was the Norwegian People’s Aid
(known affectionately in the field as the Norwegian People’s Army).

In Darfur, Sudan, the U.S. government agenda is to win control of
natural resources and leverage the Arab government into a corner and,
at last, establish a more ‘friendly’ government that will suit the
corporate interests of the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia and
Israel.

Several major think tanks — read: propaganda, lobbying and pressure
— behind the destabilization of Sudan include the Foundation for the
Defense of Democracy, Center for American Progress, Center for Security
Policy, International Rescue Committee and International Crises Group.
Individuals from seemingly diverse positions of the political and
ideological spectrum run these organizations, which are
ultra-nationalist capitalist organizations bent on global
military-economic domination.

The former Clinton officials most heavily focused on the
destabilization of Sudan include: Susan Rice, Madeleine Albright, Roger
Winter, Prudence Bushnell, Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, Anthony Lake
and John Prendergast. Carr Center for Human Rights co-founder Samantha
Power, now on the Obama National Security Council, has helped to
whitewash clandestine U.S. involvement in Sudan.

John Prendergast has continued to peddle disinformation disguised as
policy and human rights concerns through the International Crisis Group
(ICG), and through its many clone organizations like ENOUGH, ONE and
RAISE HOPE FOR CONGO. Prendergast has been a pivotal agent behind the
hi-jacking of U.S. public concern and action through the disingenuous
(and discredited) SAVE DARFUR movement.

Other notable agents of disinformation on Sudan include Alex de Waal
and Smith College Professor Eric Reeves. It is through these and other
conduits to the corporate U.S. media that the story of ‘genocide’ in
Sudan is cast as an Africa-Arab affair devoid of western interests.

In 1992, human rights researchers Rakiya Omaar and Alex de Waal
established the London-based NGO African Rights. In August 1995,
African Rights published Rwanda: Death, Despair and Defiance,
one of many pivotal ‘human rights’ reports that falsely represented
events in Rwanda, set the stage for victor’s justice at the
International Criminal Tribunal on Rwanda, and began the process of
dehumanizing millions of Hutu people and protecting the true
terrorists: Yoweri Museveni, Paul Kagame, the Rwandan Patriotic Army,
and their western backers.

THE MAN FOR A NEW SUDAN

The pivotal intelligence asset working on the ground in Sudan to
destabilize and overthrow the Government of Sudan (GoS) is Roger
Winter, profiled very disingenuously in the seven-page New York Times Magazine feature story of 15 June 2008.

Interestingly, “The Man For A New Sudan” story, an establishment
whitewash of the involvement of the U.S. military-intelligence
establishment in Sudan, was written by Eliza Griswold, a ‘Fellow’ with
the New America Foundation, a left-leaning think tank and pressure
group with a very confused ideological but nationalist-militaristic
position. (The NAF is obviously dependent on U.S. foundation funding,
and it reveals no apparent policy formulations of substance on the
Great Lakes or Horn of Africa, conflicts for which they remain
completely silent).

“When Roger Winter’s single-engine Cessna Caravan touched down near
the Sudanese town of Abyei on Easter morning, a crowd of desperate men
swamped the plane,” Griswold wrote. “Some came running over the rough
red airstrip. Others crammed into a microbus that barreled toward the
65-year-old Winter as he climbed down the plane’s silver ladder. Some
Sudanese call Winter ‘uncle’; others call him ‘commander’.”

Winter’s special post at the State Department was created
specifically for him and his ‘work’ in Sudan. Why do Sudanese people in
South Sudan call Roger Winter ‘commander’?

Roger Winter is the primary conduit for the ongoing covert
destabilization of Sudan. His operations are run primarily out of
Uganda, with the terrorist government of Yoweri Museveni providing
support through the Uganda People’s Defense Forces (UPDF) alliance with
the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA).

The SPLA is the de facto backbone of the Sudan Liberation
Army, one of the main so-called ‘rebel’ factions involved in Darfur;
the SPLA provides military and logistics support to Uganda from the
Pentagon through unknown channels, but most likely involving the nearby
Pentagon client states of Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Chad and Eritrea.

The primary Ugandan agents supporting the U.S. war in Darfur have
always been, and remain, Brigadier General James Kazini, a nephew of
Ugandan dictator Museveni and the chief of staff of the Ugandan
People’s Defense Forces (UPDF); General Salim Saleh, half-brother of
Museveni; and President Yoweri Museveni himself.

One of the main protagonists in the Darfur conflict is the current
military regime in Rwanda, whose troops have been involved in Darfur
under the guise of an ‘independent’ and ‘peacekeeping’ operation under
the African Union ‘peacekeeping’ umbrella — back by NATO and private
military companies.

Little known and widely misunderstood is the role of the United
States and its proxies, the UPDF and the RPA, in committing massive
crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide during the Rwandan
conflagration from 1990 to 1994. Prior to the RPA invasion of Rwanda
(from Uganda) in October 1990, the RPA and Rwandan Tutsi Diaspora had
publications like Impuruza published in the United States
between 1984 and 1994 (when the RPA achieved the coup d’etat against
Rwandan President Habyarimana). Tutsi refugees joined Roger Winter, who
was at the time the Director of the United States Committee for
Refugees, to help fund the publication. The editor, Alexander Kimenyi,
is a Rwandan national and a professor at California State University.
Like most RPA publications Impuruza circulated clandestinely in Rwanda amongst Hutu and Tutsi elite and it peddled a genocidal ideology against Hutu people.

The Association of Banyarwanda in Diaspora USA, assisted by Roger
Winter, organized the International Conference on the Status of
Banyarwanda [Tutsi] Refugees in Washington, DC in 1988, and this is
where a military solution to the Tutsi problem was chosen. The U.S.
Committee for Refugees reportedly provided accommodation and
transportation.

THE DEVIL CAME IN A HELIOCOPTER

Roger Winter was one of the primary architects of the RPA guerrilla
war, organized from Washington in 1989, that has led to the loss of
more than ten or twelve million lives in the Great Lakes of Africa
since 1990. Winter acted as a spokesman for the RPF and their allies,
and he appeared as a guest on major U.S. television networks such as
PBS and CNN. New Yorker writer Philip Gourevitch and Roger Winter made contacts on behalf of the RPA with American media, particularly the Washington Post, New York Times and Time magazine.

Roger Winter moved through Rwanda during the RPA invasion and worked
the front lines of the covert war as a key Pentagon and U.S. State
Department asset in collaboration with the Kagame-RPA operation of
terror. From 1990 to 1994, Winter traveled back and forth from the
RPA-controlled zone to Washington D.C., where he briefed and
coordinated activities and support with U.S. military, intelligence and
government officials.

Roger Winter is intimate with USAID, and is a long-time ally of
Susan Rice, former Assistant Secretary of State on African Affairs
(1997-2001), Special Assistant to President Clinton (1995-1997), and
National Security Council insider (1993-1997). Susan Rice is the Obama
Administration’s Ambassador to the United Nations and staunch enemy of
Omar al-Bashir.

Roger Winter is also a staunch supporter of U.S. Rep. Donald Payne,
one of the leading U.S. Democrats pressing for action to “stop
genocide” in Darfur, Sudan. Payne sponsored the Darfur Genocide
Accountability Act and was arrested in June 2001, along with John
Eibner, director of Christian Solidarity International, for protesting
against the GoS.

Christian Solidarity International has a very subversive
relationship to ‘peace’ and ‘religion’ in Sudan, and they have been one
of the front-runner organizations peddling the accusations of slavery
by the al-Bashir government, in particular, a highly contested and
controversial issue generally inflated and manipulated by
fundamentalist Jewish and Christian NGOs and missionary organizations,
like Christian Solidarity International, Samaritan’s Purse, Servant’s
Heart, and Freedom Quest International, that operate in Sudan.

“Roger Winter was the chief logistic boss for [RPA] Tutsis as early
as mid-1990,” says Ugandan human rights expert Remigius Kintu, “and
until their victory in 1994 they were operating from 1,717
Massachusetts Avenue NW in Washington, D.C. Roger Winter told a [name
deleted] South Sudanese exile at the time [1994]: ‘I have now
stabilized Rwanda and will turn my full attention to Sudan.’ Winter
subsequently closed up shop in Rwanda and based himself in Kampala
working on Sudan. A few years later, Darfur exploded and with Winter’s
manipulations, Rwanda was the first to send troops into that troubled
area. From my sources, the Rwanda Defense Forces [working under the
African Union umbrella] have killed civilians and brought in their
media experts to pile the blame on Sudanese government troops.”

This is exactly what the Kagame and Museveni terror apparatus has
done in Uganda, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Much of
the terror operations of the UPDF/RPF in Rwanda in the 1990s were
covered up by Human Rights Watch experts Alison Des Forges (d. February
2009) and Timothy Longman, Associate Prof. of Africana Studies and
Political Science at Vassar College.

Similarly, throughout the long war in south Sudan, and now in
Darfur, the atrocities committed by the U.S.-backed factions were/are
downplayed, dismissed or ignored, while those committed by competing
factions are amplified and spotlighted. Also, following the pattern of
UPDF and RPA criminal activities — such as massacres committed under
disguise and/or attributed to the ‘enemy’ — for which there is now a
long history of documentation, and given the lack of any true
independent evaluation, there is no telling who actually committed the
massacres always blamed on the GoS or ‘Janjaweed’ militias.

One Sudanese professional from the south told me recently that it
was not the Government of Sudan but rather the UPDF and SPLA who were
arming the Janjaweed — the so-called Arab militias accused of wanton
killing in an Arab-against-Black genocide. (This Arab-on-black genocide
has been widely discredited.

Professor Timothy Longman and Alison Des Forges co-produced the fat treatise on ‘genocide’ in Rwanda, Leave None to Tell the Story,
published in 1999. Longman and Des Forges produced numerous documents,
based on field investigations in Congo (Zaire), Rwanda and Burundi,
from 1995 to 2008, touted as independent and unbiased human rights
reports but always skewed by hidden interests. Both Longman and Des
Forges had relationships with the U.S. Department of State, National
Security Council and Pentagon, both were regular consultants with
USAID, and they certainly worked with Roger Winter, the Pentagon’s
secret weapon in Sudan.

On 25 September 2008, a Ukrainian freighter was seized by ‘pirates’
off the coast of Somalia and was held until a ransom of $3.2 million
was paid on 5 February 2009. (Somali fishermen disenfranchised by
international dumping of toxic [and possibly nuclear] wastes off
Somalia are labeled ‘pirates’ when they fight for their rights and
freedoms.) The MV Faina is registered in Belize, owned by a company
registered in Panama and piloted by Ukrainians. The MV Faina carried 33
Soviet T-72 battle tanks, grenade-launchers, anti-aircraft guns and
ammunition en route to Mombassa, Kenya, the Pentagon’s primary base on
the east coast of Africa.

The U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet monitored the Ukrainian ship during the
four-month standoff, with the MV Faina pinned down by at least six U.S.
and four European warships. The ship’s owner is Israeli national Vadim
Alperin (alias Vadim Oltrena Alperin), said to be a MOSSAD agent
involved with clandestine activities through offshore front companies
and money laundering. The ship was unloaded in Mombassa on February 12,
and the weapons are destined for Juba, South Sudan.

There are reports that weaponry also included tank munitions heads
sporting deadly depleted uranium and that the final recipients are the
Israeli-backed Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) ‘rebels’ in Darfur.
Sudan has previously accused Israel of supporting ‘rebels’ in the
Darfur war. International arms syndicates and dealers routinely
transfer ‘Soviet-era’ arms for international organized crime, including
covert military operations involving proxy militias and national
governments in Sudan, Uganda, Congo, Somalia, Ethiopia, Kenya and
Rwanda.

  1. See: keith harmon snow, “Oil in Darfur? Special Ops in Somalia?Global Research, 7 February 2007. []

Keith
Harmon Snow is an independent human rights investigator and war
correspondent who worked with Survivors Rights International
(2005-2006), Genocide Watch (2005-2006) and the United Nations (2006)
to document and expose genocide and crimes against humanity in Sudan
and Ethiopia. He has worked in 17 countries in Africa, and he recently
worked in Afghanistan. Read other articles by Keith, or visit Keith’s website.

23 comments on this article so far …

Comments RSS feed

  1. bozh said on March 6th, 2009 at 10:58am #

    once stars and starlettes got involved in darfur conflict, i knew it was a fake concern.
    thnx

  2. sk said on March 6th, 2009 at 1:01pm #

    This
    interview of someone who spent decades in Africa as an administrator in
    the ‘AID (read: misery) industry’ might lift the scales from a few eyes
    (that is, for that minority which wishes to see more clearly and that
    isn’t blinded by rage at the temerity of anyone questioning the motive
    of ‘agents of virtue’ from the same self-perpetuating industry).

  3. DanE said on March 6th, 2009 at 2:07pm #

    I will shortly forward this excellent well-focussed & well-organized article to my contacts list.

    A cpl minor pts: California State University is a statewide system
    with upwards of a dozen campuses; California readers probably would be
    interested to know at which this Alexander Kimenyi can be found.

    I spotted a few typos. “Peak” instead of “peek” had me confused for a long moment.

    If I was your copyeditor, which I”m not, I’d suggest using less
    conjunctions between clauses. Often just a period followed by a new
    sentence would work better for me. (?)

    Good job! now to copy & spread it around.

  4. lloyd rowsey said on March 6th, 2009 at 4:45pm #

    The
    piece is now posted at OpEdNews, in the “General_News” column, about
    half-way across the front page. Go quickly and comment, gentle readers
    (and generous editor). Pieces not promoted to the headlines at OEN get
    pushed down out of sight VERY quickly, as a rule.

  5. keith harmon snow said on March 6th, 2009 at 5:46pm #

    hello

    conjunction? what is a conjunction?

    lol. honestly, i really have no idea. failed penmanship in 2nd grade
    — teacher smashed a yardstick over my knuckles and all English related
    classes became a problem after that.

    BUSH BEFORE BASHIR!!!

    blessings
    keith

  6. denk said on March 6th, 2009 at 10:06pm #

    War Crime Shock

  7. RH2 said on March 7th, 2009 at 6:58am #

    keith,

    A nice comment. Caring about conjunction reflects the nitpicking of the bored Middle Class.

  8. keith harmon snow said on March 7th, 2009 at 7:44am #

    Hi

    That may be, but I was not putting anyone down. I simply have no
    idea what a conjunction is. It may sound stupid, but I’m an imperfect
    writer.

    blessings
    keith

  9. bozh said on March 7th, 2009 at 8:02am #

    long, long ago our army became their army; followed by our land, boys, laws, etc.
    and then our police was never ours; it was always theirs; followed by FBI, CIA
    and, then suddenly and soddenly, our[or was it ever ours?] ICC became their ICC.
    of course ICTY, was set up by ‘good’ guys. but there is no ICTUSA, or ICTI.
    thnx

  10. RH2 said on March 7th, 2009 at 8:07am #

    keith,

    I have not accused you of putting anyone down. You write pretty
    well. A conjunction is the connection of two or more statements with a
    comma (,) or a semicolon (;).

  11. Gideon said on March 7th, 2009 at 11:59am #

    What a coalition! Iran, Hamas and Hezbollah support Sudan’s president.
    300,000 Dead and 2.7 Million refugees since 2003.

    Dissident Voice contributors of all shapes and colors, please express your opinions!

    I am specifically interested to hear comparison between THIS and the
    latest crisis in Gaza and Arab – Israeli conflict in general.

    Sudan’s President expelled 13 of the largest aid organizations in Darfur, putting at risk:
    a) food and drinking water for 1.1 million people ,
    b) health care for 1.5 million
    c) huge risk of infectious disease for All.

    Up to 300,000 people have DIED and 2.7 million driven from their homes in the conflict since 2003, according to the U.N.

  12. kahar said on March 7th, 2009 at 2:22pm #

    Gideon,
    how about you read the aticle of this thread first and then you’ll have
    a better idea of what you’re talking about and less chance of making
    yourself look like an apologist for Israeli genocidal crimes?

    This is a great article.
    Keith does a thorough job in exposing the agents, agencies, mass media
    and the machinations involved in a coordinated take down attempt of a
    sovereign state. Similar techniques have been used elsewhere, the truth
    wiped out and history rewritten. Reporters like Keith are indeed a rare
    species.
    (Btw, Keith, I think what Dan’s getting at is that a few of your
    sentences around the middle of the article would read faster if they
    were chopped in two, that’s all.)
    And, Lloyd, I wouldn’t bother with OEN, their editors are nearly all
    tempraMENTAL Obamaniacs and fascists and I doubt anything will change
    that.

  13. Gideon said on March 7th, 2009 at 2:52pm #

    Sudan – Hamas, Hezbolah, Iran: Tell me who your friends are, I’ll tell …
    What about the innocent people? Where is the Dissident outcry?

  14. RH2 said on March 7th, 2009 at 3:04pm #

    Gideon,

    There is nothing to add to the comment of kahar. I will never do you
    any favor offering you numbers which you will immediately misinterpret.
    Are you really intersted in the Dissident outcry for humanity? In my
    opinion you have passed through some PR training and try to bring your
    Zionist propaganda here. Have you really any sense for the suffering of
    human beings? You lie, fake, deceive, evade topics and fear facts and
    reason.

  15. Gideon said on March 7th, 2009 at 4:26pm #

    Gaza – thanks God the Aid never stopped! Do I need to thank someone else?

    Nearly 50% of the children under five in this region are
    suffering from global acute malnutrition and need emergency feeding.

    “In Jan. 2009 Darfur has experienced the most intense fighting seen in the last year”!

    Wow, what else happened in the world in January, that Dissident Voice missed this one?

    Darfur casualties available count:

    *between Jan. and Sep. 2008: 1,200

    *between Sep 2003 – Jun 2005: 41,000

    *Civilians account for between 65 and 75% of all fatalities.
    70% of civilians die in what appear to be one-sided attacks.

    Sources: GI-Net and UNAMID

  16. RH2 said on March 7th, 2009 at 4:49pm #

    Gideon,

    This article has plainly mentioned the organizations and
    Imperial/Zionist/UN connections involved in these killings you
    propagandistically cite. Have you ever cared for human beings outside
    your Zionist Tribe? You can spare your Zionist crocodile tears on DV.

  17. keith harmon snow said on March 7th, 2009 at 5:21pm #

    Hello

    Gideon — you cite as “sources” GI-NET and UNAMID.

    Before you peddle someone else’s information, as you are, have you
    ever asked your self who GI-NET actually is? Check it out — look at
    their boards f directors etc. Look where their funding comes from.

    It seems that you think you are enraged or outraged about people
    being killed in Sudan and so you are beating the drumbeat DO SOMETHING
    DO SOMETHING STOP GENOCIDE STOP GENOCIDE.

    Do you know what Henry David Thoreau said, in circa 1857 (see his LETTERS TO A SPIRITUAL SEEKER)?

    DONT READ THE NEWSPAPERS.

    Kindly read the article that was provided as a solitary footnote.

    Here’s three other very good books I recommend you dont waste any time in reading:
    THE WHITENESS OF POWER (Goudge)
    RACE AND EPISTEMOLOGIES OF IGNORANCE (Sullivan and Tuana)
    THE ROAD TO HELL (Maren)

    You asked what else happened in JANUARY? I recommend you read this one:
    http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2009/01/ben-affleck-rwanda-and-corporate-sustained-catastrophe/

    And if you sincerely care about Africa and African people, then
    please educate your self about your position vis-a-vis imperialism and
    white supremacy, and meanwhile I can point you to where to make a
    direct and immediate impact to help someone. Sending money to CARE or
    UNICEF and beating the drums of outrage are part of the problem.

    Blessings
    keith

  18. ron said on March 8th, 2009 at 12:07pm #

    informative piece, thanks

  19. RH2 said on March 8th, 2009 at 1:57pm #

    keith,

    You certainly know, the drumbeating is not new here. The Bush
    administration was very interested in imposing a “no fly zone” over
    Darfur to be backed by aerial strikes, naval Walls (blockade) and
    starving the Sudan, one of the poorest African countries, by imposing
    more sanctions. Tony Blair was of course on the scene and was also
    “ready for action”. Both men were deeply “concerned” about massacres
    managed for the purpose of ‘divide and rule’.

    Susan Rice, under B. Clinton a member of the National Security
    Council as assistant secretary of state for African Affairs declared in
    2006, “History demonstrates that there is one language Khartoum
    understands: the credible threat or use of force. After swift
    diplomatic consultations, the United States should press for a UN
    resolution that issues Sudan an ultimatum: accept unconditional
    deployment of the UN force within one week or face military
    consequences.”

    As you know, Susan Rice is the representative of Obama at the UN.

  20. Nkunda said on March 24th, 2009 at 11:09am #

    An
    excellent and breath taking exposition of the conflicts in Africa. I
    hope the readers are taking note. Africa was way so much better before
    the imperialists first set foot. Now, we must suffer the consequences
    of a harsh and cruel society where no one speaks the truth, no one does
    right. Keith is probably among the few who are still passionate for
    fairness, justice, peace and unity.
    Mr. Keith, I have been reading through your works and watching the
    interview. As a Rwandan citizen, having survived the genocide, I have
    never been drowned in cynicism and bitterness. I find your reportage an
    awakening for inner optimism. Peace to you!!!

  21. keith harmon snow said on March 25th, 2009 at 8:18am #

    hello

    I have made an error of ordering above. I wrote:

    >>>>The SPLA is the de facto backbone of the Sudan
    Liberation Army, one of the main so-called ‘rebel’ factions involved in
    Darfur; the SPLA provides military and logistics support to Uganda from
    the Pentagon—

    Correction: … the SPLA recieves its military and logistics from the Pentagon through Uganda…

    keith

  22. Shabnam said on March 25th, 2009 at 10:42am #

    Involvement
    of ISRAEL in Sudan is undeniable. Israel was very much in the southern
    Sudan and through its fifth column, Charles Jacob who directed a
    campaign of misinformation with a spurious charge (Child slavery)
    forced Sudanese government to grant autonomy to southern Sudan where
    the ‘rebels’ who were trained in Israel and were involved in
    destabilization of southern Sudan have an office in Israel today.
    Today, the oil and other natural resources of Southern Sudan is
    transferred to Israel, US, Canada, Italy and other western countries.
    Al-Ahram writes about the ROLE ISRAEL played in Sudan and continue to
    play according to Oded Yinon plot “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s,”
    where is necessary for erection of ‘greater Israel’ toward Israel
    domination of the region from Africa to Asia.

    {Israel’s current involvement in Darfur is particularly suspicious.
    During a meeting between Tzipi Livni and several African envoys in Tel
    Aviv, the Israeli foreign minister said that her government wanted to
    help find a solution to the crisis in Darfur. One would think that
    Israel is perhaps the last country in the world that can mediate a
    crisis in an Arab country, especially one like Sudan that has no ties
    whatsoever with Israel. The only explanation is that Israel wants to
    take sides with the Darfur rebels against the Sudanese government.
    Reports indicate that the Sudan Liberation Movement has opened an
    office in Tel Aviv. Israel is also said to be arming the rebels,
    training them in camps in Israel, sending military experts to rebel
    zones in Sudan, and disguising Mossad operatives as relief workers.
    Abdullah Masar, adviser to the Sudanese president, says Sudan is under
    massive pressure to normalize its relations with Israel. The Darfur
    rebellion is being used as leverage to get Sudan to comply with
    Israel’s demands. The Israelis and Americans now have their eyes
    trained on the immense wealth of Sudan and Darfur in particular — oil,
    copper, iron, lead, etc.
    A foothold in Darfur would establish Israel in the south Sahara and
    help it gain a foothold close to the Red Sea. And it’s not just Darfur.
    Israel is encouraging Sudanese refugees from Sudan’s south and Nubia to
    reach its borders via Egypt. Nearly 3,000 people have tried that route
    so far, according to Sudanese official figures. Israel wants Western
    Sudan to secede, for then the rebels may be persuaded to grant it a
    military base in their areas — a development that would endanger Egypt,
    Libya, Sudan and the Red Sea. This scenario is not happening in Sudan
    alone, but all over Africa’s many turbulent regions.}

    ISRAEL is the main supplier of weapon to Darfur where is involved in destabilization of Sudan before the coup of 1989.
    http://www.pr-inside.com/israeli-revealed-as-owner-of-south-sudan-bound-weapons-ship-r850322.htm

  23. Shabnam said on March 27th, 2009 at 5:19am #

    Israel
    is deeply involved in Sudan to destabilize and partition the country in
    order to bring regime change, control the resources and brings the Red
    Sea under control to control the waterway and have access to water of
    the Red Sea where water is going to be more important than oil in the
    near future in the Middle East and North Africa. This is part of the ”
    greater Israel” plan. American people must pay attention to war crimes
    activity of Israel in Sudan in general and Darfur in particular. This
    is a zionist war through proxy like the phony “war on terror.”

    http://news.antiwar.com/2009/03/25/israel-killed-39-in-attack-on-sudan-convoy/

    {Answering accusations from a Sudanese minister that the US Air
    Force had killed 39 people in a January attack in that nation, US
    officials say that in fact it was the Israeli military that launched
    the attack on a convoy of trucks northwest of Port Sudan city.
    Reportedly, the Israeli planes used a US base in Djibouti to stage the
    attacks, as part of the agreement between Israel and the outgoing Bush
    Administration made in mid January. Israeli officials would neither
    confirm nor deny the attacks.}

An Indian Muslim revolutionary in America

The History Column: An Indian Muslim revolutionary in America

By Ayub Khan, TwoCircles.net

TwoCircles.net presents “The History Column.” This fortnightly
column features narratives, incidents, stories, from the past and not
so recent past of Indian Muslim history. Columnist Ayub Khan is a
student of history and Political Science.

It was a hot summer night in 1927. An elderly and weak looking man
entered a community hall in Marysville, California. The gathered crowd
of over 800 Indians became ecstatic and greeted him with a thundering
applause. Strings of sparkling tears rolled down the face of the
elderly man. He went up to the stage and began speaking with his usual
forceful delivery but suddenly stopped. He couldn’t utter a word. There
were wails and sighs from the audience. The elderly man composed
himself and smiled; it’s glow sent a cheer through the audience. But he
did not speak.

Maulana Barkatullah

A voice that has shaken the corridors of British colonial
authorities was soon going to be silent forever. This voice belonged to
the great, but almost forgotten, hero of Indian independence movement
Maulana Barakatullah Bhopali. Maulana Bhopali’s life is one full of
dedication and service-a fiery journalist, a brilliant orator, an
erudite Islamic scholar, a nationalist to the core, an author of
several books, a polyglot who knew more than seven languages, a prime
minister of India’s government -in-exile. He was all this and more.

Maulana Barakatullah passed away on his way to San Francisco on
September 20, 1927 and was buried in the Old City Cemetery of
Sacramento. His funeral was attended by Indian Americans of all
religious persuasions and they hoped that the Maulana’s remains would
eventually be transferred to India once it attains independence. But,
alas, the wish remained unfulfilled and the Maulana rests in peace in a
particularly beautiful section of this historic cemetery.

Headstone of Maulana Barakatullah’s grave in Sacramento Historic Old City Cemetery (Courtesy: Sharon Patrician)

Maulana Barakatullah Bhopali was born somewhere between 1859 and
1861 in the princely state of Bhopal in India. His father Maulvi
Muhammad Shujaat Ullah was a Madrassa teacher originally with meager
resources and income. A bright student Barakatullah successfully
completed his religious education at Madrasa-e-Sulaimaniya and
qualified as an Alim in 1878. He served as a teacher at the same school
from 1879-1880. He was able to utilize the intellectual milieu of
princely Bhopal and was likely to have come in contact with the
scholar-prince Nawab Siddiq Hasan Khan Qanauji. He is also reported to
have met the pan-Islamist and reformer Jamaluddin Afghani in 1882 and
was much impressed of his ideas.

In 1883 he disappeared mysteriously from Bhopal and ended up in
Bombay where he enrolled himself in Wilson High School in Khetwadi.
Despite being a mature student he did not mind attending the elementary
grades. At the insistence of a certain Mr. Scot he began taking private
lessons in English from him in return for teaching Urdu. Within three
years he was proficient enough to qualify for the university entrance
examination.

He went to London in 1887 and served as a private tutor teaching
Arabic, Persian, and Urdu. He himself learned German, French, and
Japanese. He was invited by the British convert Abdullah Quilliam to
work at the Muslim Institute in Liverpool in 1895. He subsequently
taught at the Oriental College of University of Liverpool. He later
distanced himself from the Muslim Institute over its style of
functioning.

While in England he came into contact with Indian revolutionaries at
India House. In response to the then British Prime Minister Gladstone’s
racist comments about India he launched a flurry of articles and
speeches criticizing the policies. As a result his activities were
severely restricted.

He left for New York in 1899 at the insistence of Muslim scholar and
activist Muhammad Alexander Russell Webb. In his six year stint in New
York he churned out a prolific number of articles related to Islam and
India which were published in Webb’s The Muslim World and also in
mainstream newspapers such as the Forum. To earn an income he taught
Arabic. He developed contacts with the Indian community in other cities
of US and Canada and sought to instill the revolutionary spirit in
them. While in America he kept in touch with fellow revolutionaries in
India and had a scholarly exchange with the poet and nationalist leader
Maulana Hasrat Mohani. In these letters he stressed on the need for
Hindu-Muslim unity in the freedom struggle. He became a founder member
of the Ghadr Party started by the Indians in San Francisco.

Maulana Barakatullah reached Japan in 1909 and was appointed a
professor of oriental languages at the University of Tokyo. He brought
out a journal The Islamic Fraternity which was known for its
anti-colonial content. After its suppression he brought out another
newspaper by the name of El Islam which was banned in British India. As
a result of his activities his appointment at the university was
terminated in 1914. This, however, did not unnerve Maulana
Barakatullah. He treated the world as his playground and moved his
activities elsewhere.

Maulana Barakatullah (extreme right) with the Turko-German Mission.

He accompanied the Turko-German Mission to Kabul in 1915 and joined
Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi and Raja Mahendra Pratap to form the
Provincial government of India. He served as the Prime Minister of the
government-in-exile. In 1919 he met Lenin and sought his help in
India’s struggle for freedom. Throughout the the early 1920s he
travelled widely in Germany, France, and Russia organizing the
expatriate Indian communities on the revolutionary path.

His 1927 visit was his second one to the New World and would prove
to be his last. He was suffering from diabetes and had a host of other
ailments but his love for the nation was such that he undertook the
long journey from Germany along with long time friend and fellow
revolutionary Mahendra Pratap. He arrived in New York in July 1927 and
stayed at a hotel in Times Square. On 15th July 1927, he was given a
reception by the Indian community at Ceylon Indian Inn on 49th Street.
He also met the Pan-Africanist Marcus Garvey, founder of the Universal
Negro Improvement Association and African Communities League. The two
also spoke at a joint gathering of African-Americans and Indians. He
also travelled to Chicago, Gary, and several other cities of the
Midwest renewing his links with the Indian and Irish communities among
whom he had many friends.

He arrived at the Yugantar Ashram, the Ghadr Party’s headquarters in
San Francisco and was pleased with its work. He then proceeded to
Marysville where he was destine to give his last public speech.
Throughout this trip his constant companion was Raja Mahendra Pratap
who was himself not keeping well and aging. According to Mahendra
Pratap’s autobiography the Maulana last words were: “I have been
sincerely struggling all my life for the independence of my country.
Today, when I am leaving this world, I have regret that my attempts did
not succeed. But at the same time I am also satisfied that hundreds and
thousands of others have followed me who are brave and truthful…With
satisfaction I place the destiny of my beloved nation in their hands.”

Maulana Barakatullah Bhopali was an epitome of sincerity and
dedication towards one’s nation. A die hard to the core he never
married as he considered it be distracting from his duty to the freedom
struggle. It is an irony that this legendary son of the Indian freedom
movement is reduced to the margins of Indian history. His name doesn’t
find a mention in the country’s text books nor does his portrait grace
the famed halls of the Indian parliament. There is, however, a
university named after him in his native Bhopal.

Maulana Barakatullah’s sojourns in America also testify to the long
standing links which Indian Muslims have maintained with the new world.
Contrary to popular perceptions Indian Muslims did not begin arriving
in America in the 1960s but at least sixty years earlier. The registers
of cemeteries across California will verify this fact.

Maulana is buried at Old City Cemetery (http://www.oldcitycemetery.com/) of Sacramento, his grave is in Section A50.

Map of the cemetery: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Old+City+Cem…

View Larger Map

Defeated in poll, Hindutva forces rearing their ugly head in Delhi

Defeated in poll, Hindutva forces rearing their ugly head in Delhi | TwoCircles.net

Defeated in poll, Hindutva forces rearing their ugly head in Delhi
Submitted by admin4 on 1 July 2009 – 4:09pm.

* Articles
* Indian Muslim

By Subhash Gatade,

Wahidbhai, who is nearing sixties, is feeling low since last few days.

A doctor by profession, he is suddenly contemplating shifting to his paternal home in Jama Masjid area from his own flat in Rohini. In fact it was only a few years ago that he had purchased this flat despite opposition from his other relatives.

To be very frank the recent developments in his own neighbourhood have left him completely devastated. He had not imagined in his wildest dreams that many of his own neighbours – who were regular visitors to his house as well as clinic – would have no qualms in raising slogans which stigmatised the whole minority community.

It was true that in this part of Delhi, people owning allegiance to his faith – who were not in significant numbers – had to travel a few kilometres just to offer Namaz on special occasions. And during the time of Ramzan when people fasted for the whole day, it became further difficult to do so. Sometime back the government had agreed to the proposal put forward by a local organisation for a mosque and had granted a piece of land in the area. Many community members in the area had contributed wholeheartedly and a token amount was deposited with the government in lieu of the piece of land.

Wahidbhai shivers to think if the police had not shown enough alertness what could have happened on the day when people had gathered there to offer Namaz (Friday, 26 th June 2009). It was a mere coincidence that he was away on that day and had gone to meet his relatives in the other part of the city. Although he had noticed the manner in which Hindutva forces had become hyperactive supposedly to stop the construction of the mosque, it was beyond his comprehension that they would resort to violence. He was also told that fanatic elements also attacked a man in his cutting saloon. And the most tragic part of the whole episode was that many youth from a poor neighbourhood which housed many victims of the tragic 1984 riots were also to be seen in the melee. The only silver lining to the otherwise disturbing situation was the manner in which few ordinary people who stood the ground and resisted the lumpens who were attacking innocents and talked of unity of all religions.

As of now there is calm in the area but it seems deceptive. Police is vigilant and is taking extra precaution but mischievous forces may again become active to keep the tensions high. Nobody can deny that they are more keen to keep the pot boiling. It was no coincidence that a temple ‘came up’ suddenly one night on a piece of government land, near the mosque itself. And a ‘bhandara’ was also organised at this temple supposedly to mobilise people. This temple was in addition to many other illegally constructed temples which have come up in recent times in the area (Rohini Sector 15, 16, 17 and others) by encroaching public land. Few such temples have even proved to be moneyspinners for their promoters

For outsiders the manner in which communal forces have become active in a middle class dominated area of Delhi may sound incomprehensible. But close watchers of the situation know the desperation in the ranks of the pro Hindutva forces when the results to the elections to the parliament were out. To the surprise of all, this area which use to be a stronghold of the saffrons, registered more votes to the Congress candidate vis-a-vis the saffrons. And thus apart from the national context where the saffrons faced humiliating defeat, the sense of vengeance among them had an added local context.

However, can it be said that this is for the first time that Delhi has witnessed such majoritarian attempts to deny even the constitutionally granted right to freedom of religion. It was only last year that a church in Delhi was attacked by the Hindu Right (Delhi church attacked 2 weeks ago, cops mum, Times of India, 4th Oct 2008).

New Delhi: The fanatical Hindu mobs have struck in the Capital. And the police has kept it under wraps. A good fortnight ago, a mob attacked a handful of Christian families at the Peeragarhi Relief Camp and demolished the frontal portion of the Christian prayer hall in the camp.

This camp in west Delhi is barely 15 km from Parliament House. To this day, this group of Christians is holding weekly mass with police protection. The families say they are living in constant fear of local miscreants allegedly owing allegiance to ”some religious organisations” who accuse them of carrying out ”forced conversions” and threaten to ”take away” their daughters unless they ”mended their ways.”

The mob had struck on September 16. Despite repeated attempts, the community has not managed to get a FIR registered for what they call ”vandalism” and police describe as ”regular land dispute”.

Ezik Malik, the priest-in-charge of the prayer hall says that a day before the actual demolition, he had got a call from an unidentified caller saying that the roof of the hall had collapsed.

”We promptly went to rebuild it when suddenly this mob of 500 reached the place carrying saffron flags and sticks. They started pelting stones that left six people injured. There were anti-Christian slogans and then they demolished part of the hall. Policemen just looked on. On hindsight I realised that they had damaged the roof to create a situation that could later be used as an excuse for unrest.” He added that despite repeated attempts the local police station refused to lodge a FIR but gave the community protection.

…DCP (west) Sharad Aggarwal denies any religious angle in the unrest. ”It was entirely a land dispute,” he claimed. ”The Christians were trying to extend the prayer hall beyond the boundary wall which is when locals objected. There was an agitation but everything was under control because we were right there when it happened. There was no demolition and we have given them police protection.”

The MCD, which is the sole body that can carry out demolitions, is not aware of any unauthorised construction here. MCD commissioner K S Mehra said he was unaware of the incident. A MCD spokesman, however, said that the police or anyone else is not authorised to carry out demolitions. ”We carry them out and ask for police protection,” he said.

A similar piece of news was reported from Dilshad Garden, Delhi when thirty Hindutva extremists had disrupted the prayer service of St. Sebastian Church on February 23, 2008 in Dilshad Garden, Delhi. Fr. Antony William, the priest of the church had told Christian Legal Association that they had prior information that local goons might attack the church, and had requested police protection for the Sunday worship service. However, the attack came after the worship service concluded and the constable had left the premises. The Hindutva extremists, who had been hiding in a nearby temple, came to the church and started shouting anti Christian slogans and disrupted the prayer service. The miscreants resorted to stone pelting at the vehicles belonging to the congregation members. Nobody was injured in this incident. The concerned police station was duly informed and a case was registered under Section 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

It need be noted that the day after the incident in Rohini, many citizens and political groups in the area organised a meeting to take stock of the situation and decide an appropriate response to the machinations of these anti-human forces. They have already sent a memorandum to the higher authorities – signed by many residents of the area as well as few resident welfare associations – c
ommunicating to them that they do not approve of such actions by the fanatic forces to vitiate the atmosphere. They have also demanded that administration maintains extra vigilance so that these mischievous forces are not allowed to raise their head again.

The said memorandum can also be said to be an open appeal to all people/formations yearning for secularism and democracy.

Isn’t it high time to understand that political defeat of an idea like Hindutva in an election does not necessarily mean its social defeat? And the recent developments in Rohini suggest that such forces can utilise every other opportunity to further polarise the situation and try to capitalise it politically.

One still remembers the famous poem by the legendary poet Gorakh Pandey: ‘Is saal Danga bahut hua, bahut hui hai khoon kee baarish, agle saal acchi hogi fasal matdaan ki’ ( This year there were many riots, much blood got spilled, next year it would reflect in voting).

(The author can be contacted at subhash.gatade@gmail.com)

Hindutva forces blocking construction of a mosque in Delhi

Hindutva forces blocking construction of a mosque in Delhi | TwoCircles.net

Hindutva forces blocking construction of a mosque in Delhi
Submitted by admin4 on 1 July 2009 – 4:07pm.

* Indian Muslim

By TwoCircles.net Staff Reporter,

New Delhi: Last Friday hundreds of activists of Hindutva organizations forcibly tried to prevent prayer at a newly allotted site for a mosque in Rohini area of North-West Delhi. Sensing trouble security contingents were deployed in large number which foiled the attempts of the Hindutva forces to flare up the situation.

The Delhi Development Authority has allotted a piece of land in Rohini to Management Committee of the madrasa Darsgah Islamia in the area to build a mosque in Sector 16 of Rohini. Soon after the decision some locals and Hindutva elements tried to polarize the issue. They launched agitation and held meetings. However, the madrasa officials were able to build a boundary around the plot and gave a call for Juma prayer on June 26.

While prayers were on on that day hundreds of antisocial elements gathered in the park in front of the mosque and started sloganeering targeting the minority community. The district administration took the matter seriously and deployed security forces and clamped IPC section 144 prohibiting movement of people in group. The agitators clashed with police and consequently about two dozen people were arrested.

Meanwhile, some groups of peaceful citizens gathered and tried to calm the situation. They protested the move of Hindutva elements to block the legally authorized construction of the mosque and prayer therein.

“As can be expected the Hindutva forces are playing a very mischievous and criminal role to aggravate the situation. The building of a new mosque in this area, on a piece of land allotted by the Delhi Development Authority, has given them a pretext to polarise the population,” says Subhash Gatade, human rights activist who lives in the area.

“Last Friday (26th June 2009) these communal elements had mobilised hundreds of people to stop people from offering Namaz at the mosque. If police would not have been there, things could have taken a turn for the worst,” he said.

Some citizens groups, social-political organisations held a meeting to decide strategy on 27th June. They decided to organise a signature campaign and also submit a memorandum to the higher authorities. An eight-member delegation of these organisations met concerned officials and conveyed to them their concern.

They also submitted a memorandum emphasizing three things:
– A significant section of the local population does not support such attempts to create new divisions in the society
– It is expected that the administration would play a proactive role to ensure constitutionally guaranteed right to faith and would also take steps to remove the feeling of terror in the minority community.
– The administration would make extra efforts to nab the real ‘ringleaders’ of this agitation.

Sarkozy wrong over the burka

Sarkozy wrong over the burka – Halifax Today

Published Date: 01 July 2009
Prescott Street
Halifax
I write further to the recent comments made by the French president Nicolas Sarkozy, regarding the wearing of a veil and burka by Muslim women.
It is ironic that on the one hand the West raises allegations against Islam that it compels and is harsh, whereas on the other hand we have here a so-called democratic state meddling and interfering in personal matters of others.
Rather than promoting unity and understanding, President Sarkozy used his address on June 22, 2009, to perpetuate pre-existing false stereotypes.
His comments are extremely unhelpful and indeed regrettable, particularly coming from the head of state of acountry in which there are around five million Muslims. President Sarkozy’s comments also directly contradict comments made by President Barack Obama recently in a speech in Cairo on June 4 where he said:
“It is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practising religion as they see fit – for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear. We can’t disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism.”
It appears that this is exactly what President Sarkozy is doing – he is hiding behind the veil of liberalism to disguise the hostility towards Islam.
Moreover, his views on the burka are both factually wrong and ill-informed. The burka is an item of religious dress which many Muslim women choose to wear. However no Muslim woman should be forced to wear it because a fundamental teaching of Islam is that “there shall be no compulsion in religion.” France should adopt the policy of Britain which is not to interfere in an individual’s personal matter which is exactly what a secular and democratic state should do.
Muslims in Britain are extremely fortunate that they can practice their religion freely – a right which is not even enjoyed in some so-called Muslim states.
There is no punishment in Islam for not wearing the veil yet here a so-called enlightened State is attempting to punish its citizens for the clothing they wear. What a tragedy.
Is the French Government now going to follow and show Taliban-like tendencies by dictating what people can and can’t do? I certainly hope not.
I do hope that France does not pursue this legislation which would contravene both Article 18 of the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights and France’s Declaration of Rights of Man and of the Citizen on which the French Constitution is based. These ensure freedom to practise religion and hold religious beliefs.
For freedom to reign, freedom must be preserved.
Farooq Aftab

Help Share the Quran with 100,000 American Leaders

CAIR ACTION ALERT #578:

Action: Help Share the Quran with 100,000 American Leaders
Sponsor a Quran today to become part of this educational initiative

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 6/30/09) – CAIR is calling on Muslims to help distribute free copies of the Quran to 100,000 local, state and national leaders by the end of the year.

The new “Share the Quran” campaign, which is designed to enhance understanding of Islam by opinion leaders and policymakers nationwide, was prompted by President Obama’s recent address to the Muslim world in which he quoted from the holy text.

SEE: Share the Quran

[View video of today’s news conference in Washington, D.C., announcing the “Share the Quran” campaign.]

A correlation between increasing knowledge of Islam and decreasing anti-Muslim prejudice also provided motivation for CAIR’s new initiative. According to CAIR public opinion surveys, only two percent of Americans say they are “very knowledgeable” about Islam, and almost 60 percent say they are “not very knowledgeable” or “not at all knowledgeable” about the faith.

CAIR is asking Muslims to sponsor the distribution of the Qurans to governors, state attorney generals, educators, law enforcement officials, state and national legislators, local elected and public officials, media professionals, and other local or national leaders who shape public opinion or determine policy.

“The long-term goal of the campaign is to put one million Qurans in the hands of ordinary Americans of all faiths over the next ten years,” said CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad.

He said “Share the Quran” materials will be made available to Islamic centers and mosques nationwide for distribution at events such as open houses or public Ramadan fast-breaking meals. (CONTACT: quran@cair.com)

CAIR’s new educational effort is phase two of its successful “Explore the Quran” campaign in which tens of thousands of Americans of all faiths requested and received Qurans.

The high-quality volumes of the Quran distributed in CAIR’s “Share the Quran” campaign are published by the Book Foundation. They contain the original Arabic script, an English translation by Muhammad Asad, transliteration of the Arabic text, and notes on individual verses.

“By quoting from the Quran in his Cairo address, President Obama generated renewed interest in what Islam’s revealed text has to say on topics such as the sanctity of human life, justice and diversity,” said Awad. “This is not an effort to proselytize, but is instead intended to provide an educational resource for those who will shape the future direction of our nation.”

Awad said the Qurans sponsored by Muslims and delivered to American leaders will include a bookmark guide to the verses cited by the president and to references related to topics such as women’s rights, social justice, respect for other faiths, and similar issues related to international events.

He added that the “Share the Quran” campaign is part of CAIR’s celebration of its 15th anniversary. CAIR was founded in June of 1994.


 

Immediate action requested to make this effort succeed:

1. Make sincere dua and pray for the success of this educational effort.

2. Sponsor one or more Qurans by going to the “Share the Quran” campaign web site (http://www.explorethequran.com/) and encourage others to do the same. Sponsorships and donations to CAIR are tax deductible and zakat eligible.

3. Organize an event in your mosque during which you will share a Quran with elected officials, law enforcement authorities and other community leaders. CONTACT: quran@cair.com

4. Share information about the “Share the Quran” initiative with friends, relatives and colleagues through e-mail lists, Twitter, Facebook, etc.

5. Encourage opinion leaders and policymakers you know to request a free Quran at: http://www.explorethequran.com

6. Imams should dedicate a khutba to let congregations know about the duty to support this campaign by sponsoring Qurans.

7. Donate to the “Share the Quran” campaign by clicking here. To donate offline or to inquire about the project, click here.

PLEASE POST, COPY AND DISTRIBUTE