Peace Homes Aluva

Simplify Building Your Dream Home

Archives 2009

Muslims protest Israeli attacks

 

State’s Muslims rally to oppose Israeli attacks on Gaza

By MariAn Gail Brown
STAFF WRITER


 

Click photo to enlarge
 

Anwar J. Karzon, of Milford, holds a sign, written in Arabic, protesting the United States’…

BRIDGEPORT — Connecticut Muslims met at an Islamic religious school Friday to protest Israeli air attacks on Gaza. The airstrikes, the Israelis say, are aimed at rooting out Hamas operatives.

“We want justice. We want peace,” Muhammed Ali intoned into a huge bullhorn to the crowd of more than 140 outside Bridgeport Islamic Community Center’s Al-Manaar School.

“We want justice. We want peace,” Ali’s audience chanted back, while many waved handmade protest posters.

Some of the signs featured photographs of the human carnage in tiny Gaza of wounded children and dead babies. The signs lambasted Israel, comparing the Jewish nation’s attacks to Nazi atrocities, called on the United States to stop defending Israeli attacks.

Motorists lumbered down Clinton Street, slowing down to check out the protesters waving Palestinian red, green and black flags and holding their posters high in the air. Midway through the demonstration, the rally ground to a hushed halt as the assembled lined up in long rows and faced east to pray.

Hassan Haid, of Trumbull, held a picture of a wounded boy with his head bloodied laying outstretched on a gurney. Haid pulled the photograph off an internet site that he says tells “the real story” of what’s happening in Gaza.

“I am sure some people want to know. I feel sorry for the USA. They are only hearing one side,” said Haid, who emigrated to the United States 30 years ago from Lebanon, where he still has


Advertisement
Quantcast

relatives. “What Israel is doing in Gaza now is the same thing it did in Lebanon [with Hezbollah]. I know from experience. My son was there.”The Israeli military launched its airstrikes on Hamas in Gaza after its six-month long truce with the militant group came to an end. The United States and a number of other western countries list Hamas as a terrorist organization. The Israeli Minister for Foreign Affairs says that between 2000 and 2004, Hamas has killed about 400 Israelis and wounded more than 2,000 in 425 separate attacks.

“We understand they want to fight Hamas,” Haid said of the Israelis. “But it doesn’t make sense to kill everybody. To kill children, how can you ever ever hope to have peace?”

Suhib Abunar, a junior at Fairfield Warde High School, who was born in Jordan, but considers himself a Palestinian, said he is paying close attention to all that transpires in Gaza, especially since he has only been back in Connecticut two months after spending a year in Jordan at a private American school where courses are offered in Arabic.

“I don’t like seeing anybody killed — Muslim or not. I don’t like war,” Abunar said, adding that after school he often stops off at a home of a family friend who has satellite television to watch Arab broadcast news from Gaza.

“Sometimes the media [here] doesn’t show everything,” Abunar said. By contrast, on the Arab broadcast stations, “you actually see bombs exploding real close to them and people getting killed right on camera.”

Khaled Elleithy, a professor at the University of Bridgeport and one of the organizers of the demonstration, said many local Muslims believe Israel’s campaign on Gaza is unjust.

“Consider what their targets are,” Elleithy said. “They have bombed civilian homes, hospitals and mosques.”

The Israeli government has said Hamas has stored rockets and other weaponry in mosques and the homes of some key Hamas operatives in Gaza.

“We do not approve of this use of military might of Israel. Their [warplanes] are F-16s from the United States paid for with our tax dollars.”

A few feet away, Hana Bajes, of Milford, a demure young woman in her mid-20s dressed in a hijab, a traditional Muslim veil, waved a sign that featured a Jewish star, an equal sign, and a swastika.

“This symbol represents the star on an Israeli flag,” Bajes said, adding that it wasn’t an anti-Semitic statement.

“I have many friends who are Jewish,” said Bajes, who was born in Kuwait, moved to Jordan after the first Persian Gulf war and then emigrated to the United States. “I’ve worked with many people who are Jews. It’s not any kind of attack on them.

“What these symbols represent here is that the actions of the Israeli military in Gaza and also on the West Bank resembles what Hitler and the Nazis did to the Jews. It’s not just Jews that are persecuted and slaughtered. It’s our people, too.”

A couple of motorists honked their horns and a few gave the protesters a thumbs-up sign.

Bajes held her sign high above her head.

“I am an American citizen. I love this country. I love what it means to live in a democracy and have the right to stand out here the way we are to make our point,” she said. “Mostly what I want to do is get people to think, to get all the information about what’s happening in Gaza and to stop the killing. I’m in a country now that cherishes freedom. So I am standing up and speaking out because that is my right.”

” in Gaza

Thousands demonstrate across Spain against ‘genocide’ in Gaza 
By h.b. – Jan 11, 2009 – 8:15 PM 
Zapatero at the rally in Ourense - Photo EFE

Zapatero at the rally in Ourense – Photo EFE
enlarge photo


The Spanish Prime Minister repeated his call for an immediate cease fire. 

Spanish Prime Minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, has said that it was his job to call for an immediate cease fire in Gaza, and he called on the leader of the Partido Popular, Mariano Rajoy, to do the same. He said he lamented that Israel continued to bombard Gaza and that he was loyal to his Socialist ideas and in favour of peace. 

Speaking at a rally in Orense, ahead of the forthcoming Galician regional elections, Zapatero centred his speech on the Middle East and the economic crisis. He did not mention the chaos on the roads and at airports over the weekend because of the snow.

Meanwhile 250,000 people, according to the organisers, took to the streets of Madrid against the ‘genocide in Palestine’. ‘Genocide is not war’ was one of the chants of the demonstrators who left the Plaza de Cibeles at noon and then held a rally in the Puerta del Sol, where there were calls for an immediate cease fire in Gaza.Demonstrators in Madrid calling for an end to the genocide in Palestine - Photo EFE

Demonstrators in Madrid calling for an end to the genocide in Palestine – Photo EFE
enlarge photo

On Saturday more than 30,000 people took to the streets of Barcelona also demanding an end to the bombing of Gaza and a commercial boycott of Israel. The demonstration started in the Plaza Universitat and ended in Sant Jaume. Many of the demonstrators carried photos of Palestinian children killed in the conflict.

A similar demonstration also took place despite the rain and cold on Saturday in Valencia outside the City Hall.

The Israeli embassy in a statement accused the Spanish people of having double standards, and asked why they did not demonstrate in the past against the Hamas aggression.


 del.icio.us |  digg |  technorati  yahoo | StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It! 
Add to Facebook Facebook | Reddit Reddit | Seed it! Newsvine | Meanme Meneame | Wikio Wikio 
Blink Blink 

ALSO SEE :
Zapatero talks to Mahmud Abbas and Ehud Olmert
– Jan 9, 2009 – 7:08 AM
King Juan Carlos calls for an immediate cease fire in Gaza
– Jan 6, 2009 – 8:10 PM
Spanish Prime Minister criticises the ‘disproportionate reaction’ of Israel
– Jan 5, 2009 – 12:43 PM

Comments

mike walsh
11 Jan 2009, 21:39

THE POOR MAN’S ATOM BOMB
“The Zionist-American Axis has phosphorized German children, atomized Japanese children, soused Vietnamese children with Agent Orange and poisoned Iraqi children with depleted uranium.
It is time for the devastated, scorned and humiliated to fight back.
The best way to fight back is with what I for many years have called “the poor man’s atomic bomb:” that is, historical revisionism, or real history.
This weapon kills and maims no one but it destroys the lies and defamations of the “holocaust© ” myth. 
This includes the fantastically profitable libels of the “Holocaust© Industry” This is also known that have been fantastically profitable for mendacious super-swindlers such as Bernard Madoff, Elie Wiesel, the cohorts of “miraculously rescues” and murderers of the children of Gaza. – Prof. Robert Faurisson 2009.
Martin Wekler
11 Jan 2009, 22:19

It seems that Hitler is not dead, he has just changed identity and resurected as “Prof. Robert Faurisson”. It’s been a long time since we’ve read such a piece of crap. Prof.Robert Faurisson text is a crime and he should face a legal action.
As for Mr. Zapatero, he has already proved in the past that as far as foreign poloicy concerned, he lacks any judgment. We haven’t heard anything from Mr. Zapatero during the past 7 years of Hamas bombardments on southern Israel, and yes, children and women lives there too. 

M. Wekler MD.

Martin Wekler
11 Jan 2009, 22:23

Correction to my comment above, the resurected Hitler is Mike Walsh or whoever hides behind this disgusting text.
bob
12 Jan 2009, 05:39

Martin, you have restored my hope in sensiblity. Thank you. I only wish that I could have attended Dr. Faurisson’s labotomy.
mike walsh
12 Jan 2009, 09:28

For more than half a century, Germany’s accusers have in the end revealed their inability to let us see a single specimen of the alleged weapons of mass destruction that the Nazis are said to have designed, built or used for “The Destruction of the European Jews” (Raul Hilberg).

“The best proof that your Nazi gas chambers and your Nazi gas vans did not exist any more than your Jewish soap, your lampshades of human skin and so much other nonsense of a vile war propaganda is that, more than fifty years after that war, your ‘scientific experts’ are, more than ever, unable to show them to us”.

Jorge
12 Jan 2009, 13:17

Where is Rodríquez the cobbler’s condemnation of Hamas. This man is a laughing stock. He would do better to keep his stupid mouth shut.

As for the despicable mike walsh, just leave him to his inconsistent, incoherent ramblings. No-one knows what he’s talking about anyway, including him.

sarah
12 Jan 2009, 16:06

Jews taking about the holocaust are like Joseph Fritzl when he was talking about his abusive mother! Why are we talking about a Holocaust in 1941 when the Jews massacred the palestenians in 1948? Proving that people have always hated the jews because whenever they have power they use it to kill or steal. AND ANY ANGRY COMMENTS DEFENDING THE JEWS OR THE HOlOCAUST ARE WRITTEN BY JEWS. Get off this website, people are getting really tired of your sob story.

Gaza, Palestine: Internationally prohibited weapons used against Gaza Strip, death toll exceeds 900 Palestinians

12-01-2009

Gaza, (PNN): Director of the Gaza Strip’s largest hospital, Dr. Hussein Ashour, reports that the nature of the wounds sustained by the dead and injured reaching the hospital are unusual.

Al Shifa Hospital has reported similar findings throughout the years of occupation resulting from the Israeli use of internationally banned weapons including carcinogens. Gaza City is surrounded by the noxious smoke from phosphorous bombs on Monday afternoon with the death toll hovering at 900 Palestinians.

Yesterday Israeli forces killed 53. Dr. Hassanein of the Ministry of Health reports more cases of “bodies cut to pieces” after attacks on Gaza City’s Palestine Square, Tuffah, Zeitoun and Old City neighborhoods. A handicapped center was bombed in Sheikh Zayed and homes in Beit Lahiya and Jabaliya. Rafah in the south was hit heavily today as well with the number of injured throughout the Strip reaching 4,100.

Yesterday’s reports on the use of phosphorus bombs have been confirmed by the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR), the Ministry of Health, doctors, residents and Human Rights Watch.

Children with deep flesh burns have joined those of the severely dismembered and others who arrive at hospitals in unrecognizable condition. The reality is more horrifying than imaginable for most with the United Nations saying that the Gaza Strip was a “living hell.”

“The injuries here demonstrate that Israel is using prohibited weapons,” Dr. Ashour told Al Sharq Al Awsat. A Norwegian volunteer working in the hospital, who has also worked in the emergency rooms of Iraq during US invasions, reiterated that the nature of the wounds confirms the use of explosive materials containing carcinogenic substances.

Dr. Ashour and the Norwegian doctor certified that people infected by these types of explosives require treatment every six months in order to prevent the development of cancerous tumors.

Palestinian medical sources had confirmed that the nature of the burns, which afflicted the bodies of the dead and wounded Palestinians arriving at Gaza Strip hospitals, demonstrated that the Israeli army used white phosphorus bombs in the shelling of Palestinian civilian gatherings. Medical sources have reported that even the bones of some of the dead and injured were burned.

Residents of the northern Strip towns of Beit Lahia, Beit Hanoun, Gaza City’s eastern neighborhoods and Jabaliya Refugee Camp have reported that the smoke emitted after the bombing of Israeli aircraft led to dozens of cases of suffocation and shortness of breath. Once white phosphorus is released into the air it rapidly oxidizes. The interaction creates heat and produces a yellow flame and thick white smoke.

The British Times reported that Israeli forces have been using white phosphorus during bombings, while local organizations are asking for an inquiry into the use by Israeli forces of internationally prohibited weapons.

Human Rights Watch said that Israel should desist from the use of white phosphorus in the military operations in civilian populated areas in Gaza, while its investigators confirmed the use targeting Gaza City and Jabaliya.

“In the view of Human Rights Watch the use of white phosphorus in densely populated areas in Gaza contravenes international humanitarian law.”

Attacks on the Strip are ongoing as of 4:30 pm Monday.

http://english.pnn.ps/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4483&Itemid=1

Email this story to a friend | Printable Version

(London) From Protest to Engagement

Shaykh Hamza Yusuf
23rd February 2007
Central Hall, Westminster,
London
[Opening Dua]

People have been here a long time, we lost some people, they just either had to go and catch the tube, or they had something on the tube they wanted to watch or something, I don’t know.

I wanted to make a few remarks. First of all, I want to address a few issues that I think are important and perhaps not for most of the people in the room, but for other people and I would like you to convey this to the other people. There are people that have been talking about the work that is being done by Fuad Nahdi, by Abdul-Rehman, by Fareena and by the other groups that have been involved in this effort; that this is a government propaganda; that these are stooges of the government of England. I’m sure some of you have heard some of these things, so I want to say a few things about them.

First of all, there’s a verse in the Qur’an that is very interesting to me, and probably to most of you, [verse in Arabic] ‘If people incline towards reconciliation, incline with them’ Wa tawakal alAllah ‘and trust in God’ inahu Huwa Samiul Aleem. [Arabic verse] When they want to incline towards peace, you incline towards peace; and if they want to deceive you, if there’s some hidden ulterior motive, God is enough for you. Don’t worry about that, that’s not your concern. Peace is so precious, that anybody who reaches out for peace, you should reach out with them for peace.

And there is another thing I want to say about this government – who do you think this government is? They are called civil servants. Who do you think pays their money? Where do you think this money is from that the government has? It’s from the pockets of the British people, who pay taxes. There are 2 million Muslims in this country paying taxes; they don’t want a little refund?

No seriously, I mean, I’m just amazed at this. Abu Hanifah said, [Arabic] The wealth of the non-Muslims, if they want to give it to you, it is permissible to take it.

Now, I’m going to be honest with you – I did not want to come here. I was in California; my wife is a brilliant cook. Really. There’s no hotel food that compares to her food. It’s not why I married her, she learnt to cook after I married her; but she’s a brilliant cook. Her food is very good. It’s nourishing, I feel good when I eat her food. And she cooks it with love. You can’t get that in a restaurant. I can taste the anxiety in their food, I can taste the anger of the cook. My cells feel it.

And I also have really good tea. I come to England, I buy the tea and I take it back. I have a big supply. My tea is much better than the tea they give at any hotel I’ve ever stayed at in England. I learned how to make tea from Abdul Adheem Sanders, excellent tea-maker. If anybody has ever had his tea, they’ll know what I mean.

So, why leave the comfort of my home? Because my Shaykh, Shaykh Abdallah bin Bayyah, asked me to. He said this is an important thing, so come. So I came. I’m tired, and whenever I get tired I become more open, because my defences are down.

I’m going to tell you some true things. I used to not like the English people. Seriously, I thought they were cynical. You know, the English people, the way they roll their eyes, there’s a certain way; there’s a smirk that comes on their mouths when you say something. Really very subtle things that you notice about the English. You know there’s a cynicism that’s particularly Anglo-Saxon in its nature and it’s really interesting. But I’ll tell you something – I have come to love these people, and for a number of reasons. I want to talk about this because it’s very important for all of you who are living here. This country is an amazing country. It has done many wrongs, and we could bring an Irish person here tonight and they could talk for hours about what this country has done wrong. We could bring Welsh people, they might not be as eloquent as the Irishmen, but they could also talk for several hours about what the English have done to them. And, you could bring some of my tribe, from Scotland, really, you could bring some of them down, and they could give you with a nice brogue, they’ll let you know what the English did. From Edward Longshanks on, or even before that. They’ll tell you about the English. But each one of these people has been challenged to learn to live with the English. Really. The Scots are very civil; some of them want independence, quite a number of them, but how are they going about gaining that independence? They are not blowing up things. They have other ways of doing it. The Welsh de-evolution, it’s been a long time. They say the Welsh are the Irish who couldn’t swim. You know it’s been a long time since the Welsh have been occupied. Much longer than Palestine. But the Welsh are a gentle people. I love the Welsh and I love the Irish. But it’s taken me a while to really appreciate the subtleties of these different cultures.

And so I really want to say, there’s two ways that you can live in your life; one is the way of husn dhann – having a good opinion; and the other way is the way of su’a dhann. Shaykh Abdullah bin Bayyah doesn’t tolerate ghiba; it’s one of the things that I love about his majlis. You can’t say anything about anybody, even people that you should say things about, he won’t let you say anything about them. Years ago, we were at a gathering and somebody mentioned something about Jamaludin al Afghani, who died a long time ago, two centuries ago. So somebody said something and Shaykh Abdullah said something I have never forgotten. He said [Arabic] ‘Have a good opinion of the dead, we’ve tried having bad opinions, we’ve tested it as a way of being in the world.’ Our Prophet, Salallahu alayhi wa sallam, had the best of opinions. Whenever the Quraish reached out for him, he reached out for them. Mu’awiyah (we know in the Arabic tradition they call it Sh’ar Mu’awiyah, the hair of Mu’awiyah) is one of the most brilliant politicians in human history. He is a case study. The leadership secrets of Mu’awiyah would be a bestseller. Mu’awiyah said. ‘If there was a hair of a relationship between me and somebody else, if he pulled on it, I would release; if he would release, I would pull. A hair of relationship; just to keep that opening there, that potential.’

You should be thankful to have people like Mockbul Ali inside the Foreign Office. I have a good opinion of that young man. He’s a bright young man and has good intentions. He’s there representing your community. You live here, you pay taxes, this is your government. This is not Rawalpindi; this is not Karachi; this is not Cairo. This is not some funny place off in the middle of the Muslim world where if you say anything against the government, suddenly you’re in chains, being dragged away. No. This is a country that you are citizens of; [Arabic verse] ‘I swear by this land and you are a lawful citizen of this land.’

You are citizens; this is not subjection; you are not subjects. The British are citizens and subjects, but this is something superficial. The Queen can’t just arbitrarily send you off to the prison. We should be wary of some of these laws being passed as they are against the essential nature of this country, and we have to remind the English – ‘You are the people of the Magna Carta; you are the people of Habeas Corpus; this is your tradition – you gave this to the western world. You are the people of John Locke and you are the people of John Wesley, who this glorious hall is named after, one of the greatest reformers in western civilisation, who worked with William Wilberforce.’

I want to tell you about William Wilberforce. This was a man, who from the early twenties was with a group in Clapham. One day, 132 black Africans were thrown overboard on a ship called the Zong. It was a slave ship coming from West Africa to the Americas. It was an English ship. 132 black people were thrown into the ocean and drowned, and this was considered legal by the laws of the land. This group of young people, who still had that spark of hope, recognised how despicable this act was, how unacceptable this act was, and they started a small group of abolitionists, to end the slave trade. At a time when almost every single Member of Parliament was supported by the slave lobby. Things haven’t changed all that much. But Wilberforce did not give up. He worked day and night – he was an incredible connector; he connected with people all over the country, got people to sign things and he brought these in as a Member of Parliament. He worked with beautiful people like Hannah Moore.

Several years ago I suggested to the Muslim women in this country to start up a Hannah Moore Benevolence Society, because you should know Hannah Moore. You should know who Hannah Moore is. She’s a beautiful Englishwoman. She was stunningly beautiful in her looks. When she came to London, she took everybody by storm. She was a playwright, she was a literary figure, she was a poetess, she was all of these things, but in the end she had a spiritual conversion and she became one of the staunchest anti-slavery spokespeople in this country. She started night schooling – one of her greatest contributions.

This is England to me. England is not the tyranny of Ireland; that’s the worst of human nature that you find in any civilisation. That’s not England to me. England to me is these incredible ideals embodied by people like Florence Nightingale. I love Florence Nightingale. I have studied and read all of her works. I told my wife – you’re the only woman I know who is jealous of a woman who died over a hundred years ago. I fell in love with Florence Nightingale. Florence Nightingale said England needs to go to the Sufis. She wrote this in her book. She said England needs to go to the Sufis. Florence Nightingale entered the Sultan Hassan Mosque, where Grand Mufti Ali Gomaa gives the khutbah, and she said for the first time, she found what she was looking for. She said, I never found this in the churches of England. She said, I found equality, and that there was a place for women in this religion.

You know, they chased her out with a stick, and yet, she said, I don’t blame them. She went to Al-Azhar, she was struck by the spirituality, and she says in her diary, ‘I’ve heard in my heart something telling me turn to Mecca, face Mecca, face Mecca, all of humanity is one, we are all under One God, and there is salvation for all of us. I kept hearing in my heart there is no God but God, believe in the One true God.’

She was a Unitarian, she was not a Trinitarian. This is Florence Nightingale, one of the great icons of the British people. This was a woman who was given a Qilada, this extraordinary medal by the Sultan Abdul Majid of the Ottoman Empire because she came and served the Turkish soldiers that were victims of the Crimean War as well as she served the British soldiers, because she didn’t differentiate between people. This is England to me. This is the England I want to see. This is the England I want to remind these people of, who they are. They’ve forgotten who they are. These are the people of the great reforms of the western civilisation, and we of all people should be reminding them. We share these things with you. You’ve forgotten who you are like we’ve forgotten who we are. This is the age of senility. We’re all in spiritual dementia. This is the old age, the dotage of humanity, and we need reminders. We’ve got collective Alzheimer’s Disease, and some of us have “sometimer’s” disease – we forget and then we remember. This is England to me, and it flows in my blood; I have ancestors from this land, this is my qawm. Ya qawmee – this is what every prophet (saw) said to his people, Oh my people. They weren’t following his way, they were fighting and they were opposing him. Ya qawmee, [Arabic] He didn’t say [Arabic]. ‘No you’re wrong, I want good for you [Arabic] I just want to help, as much as I’m able to.’ This is our teaching, to go out and to engage these people.

I was on an airplane, and this man came up to me, and he said, ‘Brother, I love your work!’ I said, “Masha’Allah, thank you so much.” He said, “No, no, really, its just so amazing what you did, it’s incredible…Let me ask you one question.” I said sure, and he said “Why did you give up singing?” So after I sang him a few bars of Peace Train, one of my favourite songs, I told him I lost my voice. No, I said that’s Yusuf Islam! We have the same name. There’s three Yusufs tonight, it’s Yusuf muka’ab, Yusuf to the third power.
_____________

But I want to end with a story about one of my favourite people. Who can tell me, and not from the Ulema, who can tell me who Sayyidina Umar’s favourite poet is. People say “Sayyidina Umar liked poetry?! Didn’t he just listen to the Qur’an?” The favourite poet of Umar ibn al Khattab was Zuhair ibn Abi Sulma. Who is Zuhair ibn Abi Sulma? He is the father of Ka’ab ibn Zuhair, the man who wrote the Burda (The Poem of the Cloak). He is also the father of Ka’ab’s younger brother who became Muslim before Ka’ab. Zuhair did not meet the Prophet, he died one year before. But I want to tell you a little bit about why Zuhair wrote his mu’alaqa and I want to use this as a metaphor for what we need to do.

The Arabs call something ayam al arab. Ayam al arab are the days of the Arabs. That’s why Allah changed ayam al arab to ayamillah. [Arabic] because the Arabs had their days, Allah has His days. The days of the Arabs were momentous things that happened to them, they say [Arabic], they used to write their history in their poetry.

There was a war called harb ud Dahis. You know who Dahis is? It’s amazing we know his name. Dahis was a horse. It’s called the War of Dahis, the Horse. And Dahis was owned by a man named Zuhair ibn Uqais al Absi. He had a friend who was from the Dhibyan tribe – Hudaifa bin Malik, who had a horse called Ghabra. Now, Hudaifa was very jealous of Dahis, the horse of Zuhair, so he asked him to race. So the two horses, they decided they’d race a hundred arrow shots – they shoot one time, two times, for a hundred times and then they race. Well, the horses started out, and Ghabra was winning, but once it got into the heavy sand, Dahis took the lead. There was a group of Dhibyanites who were hiding in ambush, and they ambushed Dahis and stopped him from winning the race, so Ghabra won. So what was the bet? A hundred camels. So Hudaifa said “Give me a hundred camels because you lost.” And then the Abs people said “No, we saw the ambush, he didn’t lose. You lost; you cheated, give us a hundred camels.” They kept on and on and on.

Finally, Zuhair ibn Qais got so angry, he killed the brother of Hudaifa. He threw a spear at him and killed him. That started the war between ‘Abs and Dhibyan. You know how long that war lasted? Forty years – over a stupid horse race.

Much later – after many many people were killed from ghatafan, to the point where you know what Zuhair ibn Qais ended up doing? He went to Oman, became a Christian and spent the last days of his life weeping over the war he started. Because he said he could never look at anybody from his tribe, because he had caused so much suffering and bloodshed amongst these people.

So, what happens? There was a man, Al-Harith Al Absi, Harith ibn Awf. This man asked his cousin, Kharijah bin Sinan, “Which tent of the Arabs do you think would not let me marry his daughter?” And she said, “Definitely Aws Atta’i – he would never let you marry his daughter.” So what does he do? This is a typical male problem. He gets on his camel and he heads for this guy’s tent to ask for his daughter. Of all the things he can’t get, that’s the thing he wants – this is a human problem. So he gets there, and this man Aws comes out and says, “Good morning. What are you doing up here, ya Sayyid al Arab?” Al Harith said “I want to marry your daughter.” Aws said “Get the hell out of here.” I mean really, that’s pretty much what he said! This made Al Harith furious and he left.

So what does Aws do? He goes into the house and his wife asks him “What happened, who was that?”

He says “It was Al Harith bin Awf, As Sayyid al Arab.”

“What did he want?”

“He wanted to marry one of my daughters.”

She said, “If he is the Sayyid al Arab, why didn’t you marry on of the daughters to him?”

He said “That’s a good point, it’s just that he caught me off guard and I was angry.”

And she said, “Well go make amends.”

He said, “I can’t. What’s done is done.”

She said, “What do you mean what’s done is done? You mess everything up and then you’re not going to go fix it? Go out there!”

And he says, “What do I say?”

“Just tell him you got him in a bad mood. And tell him to come back and we’ll work things out.”

So he goes, and Al Harith initially is angry, but he comes.

What does Aws do? He says, “I want you to choose one of my daughters. I have three daughters.”

The first one comes out. She says, “I don’t want to marry him.” Remember, Arab women had no rights.

He says, “Why not?”

She says, “ First of all I’m not that good-looking, I’m not his cousin, and he’s going to take me far away and he’ll grow tired of me, divorce me, and then what?”

So he says, “Good point. Bring the second daughter.”

She comes. “I want you to marry this man. What do you say?”

“Look, my first sister is better looking then I am, I don’t have any talents, and I don’t want to go far away from you because who is going to protect me if he gets feisty with me?”

“Good point.”

Finally the hope is on the last daughter, the little one, Buhaysa. She comes in, and he says, “Listen, Al Harith wants to marry you. What do you say?

She said, “ Well, given that I’m the most attractive of my sisters, I’m extremely talented, and I have a most distinguished father, I don’t see how he could refuse me, and then if he treats me badly, God will definitely let him have it!”

So he says great, and they get married. As they’re moving out, they set up a tent next to the house, he goes in to consummate the marriage (that’s a nice word for things people do on their wedding night). So when he gets in there, she says, “What kind of a woman do you take me for? We’re right next to my father and my brothers. Let’s go.” So they ride off and a little way out, he tells his cousin, “Listen you go up ahead, and I’ll catch up with you later.” He stops by the side and sets up the tent. She says, “What kind of woman do you think I am? This is the way people who take women in wars behave! Take me to your home, slaughter sheep, make a big festival!”

He thinks, “This is a high minded woman.” So he takes her and then his cousin says, “Did you do what you wanted to do?” He said no, and explains to him. So they get back, and he does a big festival. When it’s all done, he comes in, “How’s things now?”

She said, “I want to ask you one question. What kind of a man are you? I thought you were a man of honour but I want to ask you one question: How is it that you can delight in women when there are people, Arabs, right now killing each other over a horse race? If you want me as a wife, go out and spread peace amongst these men, and end this bloodshed.”

He goes out and tells his cousin, and the cousin says, “This is a high minded woman, and she will give you great sons, so let us go and do this.” They went out and got the Abs and the Dhibyan to agree that if they were to count all of the dead, whoever had the most killed, these two men would pay 3000 camels from their own wealth – to end this war.

And this is when Zuhair wrote his mu’alaqa in praise of these two men, for what they did. But I think it’s Buhaysa that he should have written a mu’alaqa about, because that is where it has to come from. It’s the women in our homes – they are the one who can change this situation more than anybody else. Our women need to be like Buhaysa and get our men squared away. I really mean that. You are the vicegerents of God.

Extremism is here to stay folks. This is the most extreme society, and I’m talking about the whole globe right now. We’re in the most extreme conditions in human history. We’ve got extreme eating. When I grew up, small was like this, medium was like that, and large…..Now, that’s medium! That’s extreme eating. I used to eat with 10 people around a plate. And now people are walking around, unable to control themselves anymore. They are having to take out Victorian seats in the theatres of England because the American fat behinds can’t fit in them anymore. This is our reality – we’re extreme. We’re eating extreme.

Look at the extreme sports in this country. You know what Sky Television says? It says ‘If your religion is football, then worship with us.’ They call us idiots because our community kill people over what somebody said about the Prophet (saw) and yet they kill each other because some football team beat another football team.

There are sufaha everywhere, but really, what is more stupid, to kill over a stupid football game or to kill because the greatest person in your life has been desecrated, denigrated? They’re both wrong, but don’t call our people fools and not call your own people fools. This is extremism at its worst. Look at the pornography that they have, the denigration of these poor women. You know, the word in Arabic for oppression is related to the word for prostitute, because prostitutes are the most oppressed human beings on the planet. And there’s sexual slavery all over this planet. Some of the biggest downloads in the Muslim world, on Google, according to their own statistics, is pornography.

What’s happened to people? Really – think about this. We’re in extreme conditions. We need the abolition from our nafs. The Arabs say, [Arabic] The free man is a slave as long as he desires other than God, and the slave is a free man as long as he is content. This is real abolition. This is what William Wilberforce is about – his movement needs to be resurrected, but we need liberation from our own egos.

Jazakumallahu Khairan. It has been an honour. I love you, I love this country. I want to see good for this country. Really. And this Government – there’s much to say about the bad things of this government, and you know my criticism. I’m against the war in Iraq. I want the war to end. I want these British troops home. I don’t want them over there. I don’t want the American troops over there. I am against this – I have always been against it. Really, I am completely against it, on both sides – they’re both unacceptable. It’s terrorism on both sides. They’re both terroristic conditions. You’re terrorising people in their homes, using cluster bombs in Lebanon. Really, this is terrorism, and it needs to be condemned as terrorism. And I condemn it. We all condemn it. So we need to recognise that.

But this Government has much good in it, and our teachers teach us, [Arabic] If you’re in a blessing, watch out, you better guard it, because once you lose it, it’s gone, and disobedience is what causes it to be lost. And the Arabs say that Allah (Most High), He said that, [Arabic] A ni’m, if you don’t recognise them, [Arabic] Losing your blessings is what teaches you your blessings, so before you lose them, count your blessings. [Arabic]

Jazakumallahu khairan. Wasalaamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu.

The Collective Trauma of Injustice

Dr. Ingrid Mattson at Cambridge University on 12th October 2008. This presentation is brought to you by The Radical Middle Way Initiative and the Cambridge University Islamic Society.

You can also listen and watch this lecture online.

Al-Salam ‘alaykum.

[Opening du’a]

Prince Qazi is my hero as well, but Mufti Mustafa Ceric has been my hero for a longer time. May Allah protect him and all of us, and continue him in his leadership. To me he is an example to all of us of the kind of leadership that we need, which is real wisdom and steadfastness, in the way of enormous challenges.

We need not just knowledge, but we need this to be able to develop this prophetic character of being able to hold our heads up in dignity but in a humble way, not in an arrogant way. This is the prophetic way, and this is what we see in him and in other leaders who have been such examples for us and have allowed us to move forward and grow in the face of enormous challenges in recent years.

Muslims have always been highly adaptable to diverse situations, which is why Islam is a world religion and not just an Arabian religion. It’s why Muslims have been able to live in all climates and cultures, adopt and adapt, all different language groups, and to make them sacred languages by infusing them with the spirit of the Qur’an. So we need to be able to understand what is needed for our time, and since I’ve had the opportunity to serve the Muslim Community in North America, I’ve had to learn many things that I never thought I would have to learn about. And one of those things is how people receive messages, and what it does to them psychologically, even physiologically, because psychological events have a physiological impact on the brain.

So neuroscience has shown, for example, that when people look at images of someone from their group – a group that they identify with – and that means their ethnic group or their national group – a group that they consider to be ‘their people,’ that when people look at those images they experience that event. That perception is experienced as a trauma, as a psychological trauma. It leaves an impact in the brain. When we perceive things, neurological connections are formed, new connections in the brain are formed. So it’s not just a thought or a memory, as people would have thought in medieval times: that we have images floating around in our brains that can simply be flushed out. But it leaves a real, material, impact on our brain.

What’s important about that? What’s important is that in a world in which we are flooded with images – and traumatic images – we are being changed as human beings, by what we are seeing. And that the flood of negative images, the flood of traumatic images of people being blown up, of people being abused, of people being tortured, is traumatising us in a real way that has caused us as human beings to be unhealthy, and unstable, unless we have a way of dealing with this. Unless we have a way of taking this event and responding to it in a healthy way that forms a healthy brain and a healthy personality. Its why people who are highly compassionate in their close relationships feel compelled to in fact respond in often a very violent way and even transcend their own limits of ethics and morality, in order to protect those they perceive to be their group members, because of this experience of trauma. So we need to really understand what’s happening with human beings in our age, in this age when you are flooded with these negative images in order to respond appropriately.

I’ve spent many years speaking to people about Islam, public groups, audiences, church groups, civic groups, large and small gatherings of people, and what I’ve noticed over the past decade is that, let’s say within the last four or five years, responses to what I have to say have changed. So I would say that ten years ago, non Muslims were generally open to learning. They would acknowledge that they didn’t know anything about Islam or that they knew very little, that they didn’t know Muslims, and so they were open to hearing what we had to say – who we were, how we perceived ourselves and how we defined ourselves. In the last four or five years that has changed.

What I find is that the audiences I speak to have already established a perception of what a Muslim is, what Islam is, and are now very sceptical of what I have to say. I’ve had people stand up in the audience – so imagine this- an ordinary person saying ‘but what you don’t understand about Islam, or what you don’t know about Muslims is this,’ so they are claiming knowledge of Muslims, a knowledge that trumps my knowledge (a knowledge of a professor, a knowledge of someone who’s a leader of a Muslim organisation, who has this experience). And it’s not simply an act of arrogance – they really do believe they have knowledge of Muslims in Islam. So what’s happened? And here again we have to understand how the Muslim mind works.
_______________
There’s something called the ‘anchoring affect’ which is that the first time you hear a piece of information about a new concept or event, that forms the category or the de facto position in your mind with respect to that event or that piece of information. So that anchors the information in your brain and afterwards, everything you hear about that subject will be weighed, measured or compared against that initial piece of information. And so if new information comes in, people will either treat it sceptically, they can change their mind but it takes more work, or they can reject it because it conflicts with what they have already learnt.

So what we’re dealing with now with regard to non-Muslims and their relationship to Islam, is not a blank slate, they are not simply ignorant to Islam – what our scholars would call ‘jahl baseet’ – but they have this complex ignorance, meaning that they think they know. And as I said, it’s not a question simply of arrogance, but we all as human beings, as people that process knowledge in this way, are susceptible to the same thing. With other pieces of information, with new events, people, we also do the same thing. So how can we deal with this? How can we deal with people who have been traumatised by very violent events, who see a continuing reaffirmation of their fear, because of the continuing flood of traumatic images of who they consider to be their people being harmed? And then people who already have in their minds, this information anchored, about what Islam and Muslims are. So how do we deal with them?

But we need to first understand that this is their state of mind, and extend some compassion to them, acknowledging that. Because it’s a state of mind that is fear and that is easily manipulated. So we need to have compassion for people, but also then, with wisdom, guide them to a new understanding. So first – and this is why we constantly find non-Muslims waiting at the end of a two-hour talk about general Islam, to ask one question which is, ‘why have Muslims not denounced terrorism? Why are they not louder about the voices of the extremists?’ and then of course all of us are very frustrated because we do this all the time. We say that we’ve denounced violence and acts of terrorism all the time, but of course that information doesn’t stick in the way that the bad information does. Those images are not traumatic. A benign image is not traumatic so it does not affect the human brain in the same way. It doesn’t stick. You may see a piece of information in which it says that Muslims met, and they spoke and they talked about what we have in common, but you read it and then it’s gone. It’s more of an ephemeral event.

So these statements that we’ve been making, and as Shaykh Ceric said, in our various capacities all these statements and events and documents, they didn’t stick with people. And they were still under the impression that most Muslims were complicit in the statements and extreme actions of those other Muslims. This is why it was important to have a message – a positive, accurate and truthful message – that stuck in people’s minds. We needed a message that would stay there, and lodge in the brain and be able to dislodge the previous information that was anchored there, and therefore one of the reasons why this message is very important. Because it’s a message that sticks. Because it’s written in a way, it’s been presented in a way, which sticks with people. It could easily have been another message; it could have come from other quarters. It’s not necessarily that the precise way this has been written, or the exact numbers of scholars or individuals who signed onto this was the perfect mix. But it’s the one that performs the job the best, and because of that, it’s one that we should all adopt and promote.

The more people that speak about it with its trademark name (I don’t know if its trademark, it should be if not), we should speak about it over and over and over and use a common word, talk about a common word. Because then we will have a message that will stick with people and that will be able to dislodge these former misconceptions. So that’s important. And this is part of strategy in teaching and in giving information. And this is something that Muslims have always understood, that it’s not just about the message, but the form of the message.

Allah subhana wa ta’ala revealed the Qur’an in a beautiful form. It’s not just the information that’s given by Allah subhana wa ta’ala, but it’s the form that the Qur’an was revealed in that made it stick with the people. It is of course God’s word, God’s word revealed in a form that is perfectly receptable to human beings. So we need to understand that the medium, as Marshal McLewin said, is the message. So we need to grab onto to it for that.

I don’t want to take up too much time, so let me say a few other things about the common word.
________________
I think it was also important psychologically for Muslims that show that Muslims can exercise leadership. We’ve been in a defensive position for a long time. And this is not just problematic, not just in terms of psychologically and emotionally draining where we are always having to defend ourselves, but it also shows our lack of setting aside our proper role among humanity, which is that Allah subhana wa ta’ala sent us the message of Islam to be leaders, to be moral and ethical leaders. And we haven’t played that role.

So the fact that this came from the Muslim Community, not simply as a response to the Pope (because it would have been easy just to respond), but as a new way, a new form of engagement, is very important. Because it’s a reminder to ourselves of our role we need to play on this Earth. And let me say now, that now that it’s clear that we’ve done this, we need to continue to implement it and carry it forward; we should start getting in the habit of being moral and ethical leaders.

If we look at the global economic crisis that’s happening for example, we see that Muslims have not been leaders, and looking at issues of economic justice. Although there have been some very outstanding individuals, in terms of the global economy, we have been followers, which is why a number of Muslim countries will now be dragged down as the United States is drowning the drowning man is pulling down others with him. But here’s an opportunity for Muslims to stand up forward again with leadership; Islamic finance is based on justice and equality and shared risk which is the opposite of financial principles that have dragged the whole world down into this economic crisis. I hope that Muslims will once again rise (Muslims other than myself – this is not my area of expertise but it’s the area of expertise for many others) to the occasion, and show some leadership and say ‘look, there is a better way.’ And the better way is one in which excessive consumption is something that we shun. We want people to improve their quality of life, but in a way that is fair, just and allows people to live in a community mercifully and that also does not do enormous damage to the Earth.

Finally I would like to say, that I cannot but echo more strongly what Shaykh Mustafa Ceric says about the obligation on your part to implement this message. It’s one of the most satisfying things I’ve seen in the last year is the way that in America Christian groups and local communities have responded to this. What’s interesting to me is that across the United States there have been many communities – small churches that have reached out to Muslims in their neighbourhood – wanting to have interfaith engagement. Kind, compassionate and ordinary people, who out of this innate sense of compassion for other human beings reached out to Muslims because they felt that – and saw – that Muslims were under attack and did this as a gesture of kindness and neighbourliness, from their understanding of what a Christian should be. But in response to that intuitive and spontaneous gesture of outrage, there were ideologues in both communities – both in the Muslim Community and Christian Community – who tried to prevent this natural kindness and neighbourliness and compassion from coming together, who said you can’t work or you shouldn’t speak with those people because they’re utterly unlike us.

So our ideology can get in the way of our fitra, our natural kindness, justice and compassion for each other; this natural sense that we do have a connection. That means there needs to be an ideological response, or a theological response, if I can put it in a more positive term. So the common word is very important for that, and for what we’re doing, because look at our leaders – both Muslim and Christian – have said; they’ve affirmed that our outreach to each other is something that is good and that is necessary.

A small community in my neighbourhood, a small community of Franciscans, the Muslim women, and Christian women primarily, had been getting together for coffee and conversation for a number of years. they took this document and the whole community had a receiving/welcoming ceremony for it. It’s a beautiful thing on a very small scale, but in the end, those are the people who are going to protect us, who are going to speak for us, who are our allies, and on a larger scale, in a place like the United States, who are going to vote for those leaders, who are for engaging and dialogue, or who are for conflict and disharmony.

So please, take up the document, take up the challenge, think of all the creative ways you can implement it, and I believe it will continue to be (and we will see over time) even more important than it was in the beginning.

Thank you.

Al-salam ‘alaykum.

How to be Muslim in America

Today’s column is presented as a public service for Muslim readers. Call it a list of Things Not To Say If You Are Muslim. The need for such…

By Leonard Pitts Jr
Syndicated columnist
Today’s column is presented as a public service for Muslim readers. Call it a list of Things Not To Say If You Are Muslim.

The need for such a list is illustrated by a New Year’s Day incident at Washington’s Reagan National Airport. An AirTran Airways flight was delayed two hours and a group of nine Muslims — eight family members and a friend — was refused permission to fly after two teenage girls overheard a member of the group say that sitting near the engines would be particularly unsafe in the event of an accident.

The girls told their parents, who told flight attendants. Next thing you know, 104 passengers are cooling their heels as the plane and all its baggage are rechecked by security officials. Even after the plane was cleared to fly and the group — eight of them native-born U.S. citizens — was determined to be no threat, they were still not allowed back on the plane. They wound up paying for seats on another carrier. AirTran initially refused to apologize for the incident, but quickly backtracked.

So there you have No. 1 on the list of Things Not To Say If You Are Muslim: Do not say anything about air safety. Granted, that’s a staple, albeit morbid, topic for skittish fliers the world over, but you are not “the world over.” You are Muslims in America, post Sept. 11. You may not discuss air safety. Not even to say, “For criminy sake, Malik, take your Valium and shut up; flying is perfectly safe.” If you discuss air safety even to defend it, we will have to conclude that you are a terrorist.

No. 2. Do not use “gee” words. Do not say jeepers, gee-whiz, Jesus or Jehosophat. Someone listening in may think you said “jihad” and we will have to conclude that you are a terrorist.

No. 3: Do not say jihad. If you do, we will have to conclude that you are a terrorist.

No. 4: Do not discuss movie history. Eventually, someone will observe that “Ishtar” was one of Hollywood’s all-time biggest bombs. Someone listening in will report that you plan to blow up Hollywood and we will have to conclude that you are a terrorist.

No. 5: Do not talk sports. Somebody might say, “Boy, I hate the Dolphins.” Then Homeland Security will have to shut down SeaWorld, Shamu will have to be guarded by unsmiling men in sunglasses … and we will have to conclude that you are a terrorist.

No. 6: Do not discuss the weather. If someone says, “I can’t believe it’s raining again today” and someone else says, “Weatherman says it’s going to be even worse tomorrow,” and then the first someone says, “Any more of this and we’re all going to drown,” someone listening in will report a plot to blow up the levees and flood the town. And we will have to conclude that you are a terrorist.

Indeed, it occurs to me that it might be easier to list the things that are safe for you to talk about, that won’t make some eavesdropper think you an evil, America-hating outsider. There are two things. The first: lawsuits. There is nothing more reflective of American values than suing the so-and-sos who have mistreated and embarrassed you.

Indeed, one of the detained Muslims told The New York Times, “We have not ruled out the possibility of legal action.” It struck just the right tone, saying to skeptical fellow Americans in no uncertain terms: Hey, we are just like you.

The second thing on the list of safe topics: baseball. Yes, I know what I said about sports. Baseball isn’t sports. It’s hot dogs, blue skies, homeruns, Americana at its most iconic.

Besides, it’s OK to say you hate the Yankees. Most people do.

Yes, you may think it pathetic that Americans have become such a skittish, paranoid lot that you can only talk about lawsuits and baseball without arousing suspicion. But look on the bright side:

Spring training begins next month.

Miami Herald columnist Leonard Pitts Jr.’s column appears Sunday on editorial pages of The Times. His e-mail address is: lpitts@miamiherald.com

2009, The Miami Herald

So what have Gazans got to complain about?

When you read the statements from Israeli and U.S. politicians, and try to match them with the pictures of devastation, there seems to be only one explanation. They must have one of those conditions, called something like “Visual-Carnage-Responsibility-Back-To-Front-Upside-Down-Massacre-Disorder”.

(Watch video: Israel launches deadly air strikes on Gaza)

(Watch video: UN calls for Israel to open Gaza border to aid)

(Watch video: Staying alive in Gaza)

For example, Condoleezza Rice, having observed that more than 300 Gazans were dead, said: “We are deeply concerned about the escalating violence. We strongly condemn the attacks on Israel and hold Hamas responsible.”

Someone should ask her to comment on teenage knife-crime, to see if she’d say: “I strongly condemn the people who’ve been stabbed, and until they abandon their practice of wandering around clutching their sides and bleeding, there is no hope for peace.”

The Israeli government suffers terribly from this confusion. They probably have adverts on Israeli television in which a man falls off a ladder and screams, “Eeeeugh”, then a voice says, “Have you caused an accident at work in the last 12 months?” and the bloke who pushed him gets £3,000.

The gap between the might of Israel’s F-16 bombers and Apache helicopters, and the Palestinians’ catapulty thing is so ridiculous that to try and portray the situation as between two equal sides requires the imagination of a children’s story writer.

The reporter on News at Ten said the rockets “may be ineffective, but they are symbolic.” So they might not have weapons but they have got symbolism, the canny brutes.

It’s no wonder the Israeli Air Force had to demolish a few housing estates, otherwise Hamas might have tried to mock Israel through a performance of expressive dance.

The rockets may be unable to kill on the scale of the Israeli Air Force, said one spokesman, but they are “intended to kill”.

Maybe he went on: “And we have evidence that Hamas supporters have dreams, and that in these dreams bad things happen to Israeli citizens, they burst, or turn into cactus, or run through Woolworths naked, so it’s not important whether it can happen, what matters is that they want it to happen, so we blew up their university.”

Or there’s the outrage that Hamas has been supported by Iran. Well that’s just breaking the rules. Because say what you will about the Israelis, they get no arms supplies or funding or political support from a country that’s more powerful than them, they just go their own way and make all their weapons in an arts and crafts workshop in Jerusalem.

But mostly the Israelis justify themselves with a disappointing lack of imagination, such as the line that they had to destroy an ambulance because Hamas cynically put their weapons inside ambulances.

They should be more creative, and say Hamas were planning to aim the flashing blue light at Israeli epileptics in an attempt to make them go into a fit, get dizzy and wander off into Syria where they would be captured. But they prefer a direct approach, such as the statement from Ofer Schmerling, an Israeli Civil Defense official who said, “I shall play music and celebrate what the Israeli Air Force is doing.”

Maybe they could turn it into a huge national festival, with decorations and mince pies and shops playing “I Wish We Could Bomb Gaza Every Day”.

In a similar tone Dov Weisglas, Ariel Sharon’s chief of staff, referred to the siege of Gaza that preceded this bombing, a siege in which the Israelis prevented the population from receiving essential supplies of food, medicine, electricity and water, by saying, “We put them on a diet.”

It’s the arrogance of the East End gangster, so it wouldn’t be out of character if the Israeli prime minister’s press conference began: “Oh dear or dear. It looks like those Palestinians have had a little, er, accident. All their buildings have been knocked down — they want to be more careful, hee hee.”

And almost certainly one of the reasons this is happening now is because the government wants to appear hard as it wants to win an election. Maybe with typical Israeli frankness they’ll show a party political broadcast in which Ehud Olmert says, “This is why I think you should vote for me”, then shows film of Gaza and yells: “Wa-hey, that bloke in the corner is on FIRE.”

And Condoleezza Rice and her colleagues, and the specially appointed Middle East peace envoy, could then all shake their heads and say: “Disgraceful. The way he’s flapping around like that could cause someone to have a nasty accident.”

World urges Israel to end Gaza attacks

Protesters around the globe have continued their rallies against the Israeli bombardment of Gaza which has so far killed 783 Palestinians.

Algeria

Thousands of Algerians, wearing Palestinian headscarves and chanting “USA Terrorists” marched downtown streets of Algiers on Thursday in a show of support for Gazans and an attempt to denounce Israeli onslaught on the Gaza Strip. Police made several arrests.

Egypt

After the Friday prayers, more than 50,000 Egyptians rallied across the country to condemn atrocities committed by Israel against civilians in besieged Gaza.

In the Mediterranean port city of Alexandria, participants expressed their anger at the Zionist entity and at Arab regimes believed to have assisted the crippling Israeli blockade on the enclave that has barred the residents from getting out and humanitarian aid from getting in. The demonstration had been organized and led by lawmakers linked to the opposition Muslim Brotherhood.

The marchers echoed slogans such as “Down with Israel and with every collaborator” as well as “Gaza, excuse us — opening Rafah is not in our hands.” The latter made a reference to the Gaza-Egyptian border crossing that Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak’s government is refusing to open.

In the Egyptian capital, Cairo, riot police sought to foil protests outside a number of mosques. At least 35 opposition activists were held as ministry of religious affairs had earlier warned imams against addressing the Gaza crisis.

Greece

Also, over 2,000 people took to the streets in Athens and Thessaloniki, setting fire to US and EU flags outside the US embassy and the Israeli flag outside the Israeli mission.

Indonesia

About 200 women, holding posters of dead and wounded Palestinian children, demonstrated outside the Egyptian embassy in Jakarta, and call on Egyptian government to open Rafah border with Gaza.

Italy

A group of Roman merchants urged a boycott of Jewish companies as a sign of protest at continuing carnage in Gaza.

Jordan

[IMG] More than 2,000 demonstrators — wearing checkered Palestinian keffiyehs and carrying Palestinian and Jordanian flags – chanted “No Israeli embassy on Arab territory” and “Arab rulers are cowards in the capital Amman.”

The protestors had set off from Friday prayers at the Kaloti mosque towards Israeli embassy, nearly a kilometer (half a mile) away. Police however stopped the crowd. The marchers instead set up a symbolic cemetery with the word ‘Gazan’ written on each mock coffin.

Kashmir, India

Hundreds of Muslims staged a demonstration in the city of Srinagar in protest to Israel’s continued military offensive in the Gaza Strip. Protesters set fire to Israeli flags and chanted “Death to Israel” and “Long live Palestine”.

Kuwait

[IMG] Protesters in Kuwait burn an Israeli flag and hit it with shoes while shouting anti-Israel and anti-Hosni Mubarak (President of Egypt) slogans during a protest against Israel’s offensive in Gaza, in Kuwait City January 9, 2009. About 3,000 gathered outside Kuwaiti parliament and shouted ‘shame, shame against Arab inaction vis-Ã -vis Gaza.’

Malaysia

Islamic groups urged a boycott of US brands such as Coca-Cola and Malaysians working for Starbucks or McDonald’s were demanded to give up their jobs.

Norway

Around 1,000 pro-Palestinian protesters engaged in fight with a pro-Israeli demonstration in Oslo on Thursday. Six people sustained injuries and 31 were arrested in the incident.

Occupied Palestinian Territories

[IMG] A Palestinian youth uses a sling-shot to hurl a stone from behind a burning tire barricade during clashes with Israeli troops at a protest against Israel’s military operations in the Gaza Strip. In Khan Yunis , some 3,000 held a demo to show solidarity with Gazans. The demonstrators threw stones at Israeli soldiers who in return fired rubber bullets. Meanwhile, several thousand shouted “Death to Israel” in Nablus. In al-Quds, young Palestinians clashed with police.

Somalia

[IMG] Muslim protestors shout slogans during a demonstration in Somalia’s capital Mogadishu, January 9, 2009, against Israeli air strikes in the Gaza Strip. Hundreds of Somali demonstrators protested after Friday prayers in Mogadishu, and a number of other towns in Somalia, against the Israeli raids on Gaza Strip. People chanted slogans against Gaza bombing and called for an immediate halt to the bombing which has so far claimed many innocent children, women and the elderly.

How many must die before peace prevails?

by Harris Zafar, Guest opinion

Monday January 05, 2009, 5:00 AM

Harris Zafar

When Palestinians and Israelis both pray to God for help in destroying the other, who does God choose to help? Which of the two are the “good guys”?

Well, based on the actions of both parties, I fail to see why God would help either of them. Both parties claim loyal adherence to God and his teachings, but sadly, both parties violate the law of their respective faith. Let’s look at the facts.

As a practicing Muslim, I’m critical of Muslims who don’t act according to the teachings of Islam. So let’s begin with Hamas. Sure, some may argue the case of Gaza residents having their food, water and medical equipment supply cut off by Israel. Others may cite the Nov. 5 Israeli attack under the Gaza fence. But how does it help to fire rockets in return? Each rocket has the possibility of taking an innocent life, which is strictly forbidden in Islam.

Do those who fire them not understand the Holy Quran when it repeatedly says “create not disorder in the earth” or even when it says that killing even one person is like killing all of mankind? Reverence for life is a part of Islam, but the very nature of rockets is to put lives at risk.

And what about the Israeli Defense Forces? How can its leaders justify their response when their actions are breaking the very law they claim to follow? The Mosaic law of “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” teaches the principle of equitable retaliation. The purpose of this law was to limit the scope of a punishment and to discourage cruelty. Yet Israel has unleashed an all-out attack of warlike proportions, killing more than 400 Palestinians and wounding more than 2,000 more in merely seven days. Can we consider the death of 400 Palestinians in response to the death of four Israelis to be equitable retaliation?

Both Israelis and Palestinians are religious people, but when it comes to matters concerning one another, their respective leaders toss their religious beliefs to the side and act with raw emotion, with disregard for the value of life.

Israel and Palestine both consist of men, women and children who desire peace and security instead of violence and fear. Their respective faiths, as well as the principle of rationality, dictate that each must refrain from using violence to solve their problems. True peace can only be achieved by working together as children of God.

If both parties instilled humanity, mercy and forgiveness into themselves, perhaps God would find more value in their prayers. But how many must die before the God-given qualities of humanity and peace prevail?

Harris Zafar, a business analyst in the information technology industry, is the youth director of faith outreach within his mosque in Southwest Portland.

See more in Hot Topic, oped
.post-footer img { margin-top: -10px }

var vs_blog_indexpage=”Opinion Impact – The Oregonian – OregonLive.com”;
var vs_blog_pagetype=”Individual”;
var vs_blog_category=”Hot Topic, oped”;
var vs_blog_title=”How many must die before peace prevails?”;
var vs_blog_tags=””;
var vs_blog_data;
if(vs_blog_pagetype ==”Main” || vs_blog_pagetype ==”Individual”) {
vs_blog_data=vs_blog_indexpage;
}
if(vs_blog_pagetype ==”Category”) {
vs_blog_data =vs_blog_category;
}

var blogs = [];var titles = [];var cats = [];var tags = [];result = [];
blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “Letters to the editor: health care, energy-efficiency, Israel-Palestine”;
cats[cats.length] = “Letters”;

blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “Letters to the editor: Israeli-Palestinian conflict boils over”;
cats[cats.length] = “Letters”;

blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “LNG terminals and pipelines threaten Northwest fish”;
cats[cats.length] = “Environment”; cats[cats.length] = “oped”;

blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “Turning away Roland Burris”;
cats[cats.length] = “Politics”;

blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “Protecting forestland from development”;
cats[cats.length] = “oped”;

blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “Bush burnishes his environmental legacy”;
cats[cats.length] = “Editorials”; cats[cats.length] = “Environment”; cats[cats.length] = “Politics”; cats[cats.length] = “land use”;
tags[tags.length] = “Bush”; tags[tags.length] = “Environment”; tags[tags.length] = “Oceans”; tags[tags.length] = “politics”;
blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “Cartoons: Not even a crumb”;
cats[cats.length] = “Cartoons”;

blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “Cut the calorie postings”;
cats[cats.length] = “Elizabeth Hovde”; cats[cats.length] = “Hot Topic”; cats[cats.length] = “Multnomah County”; cats[cats.length] = “Politics”;
tags[tags.length] = “calorie postings”; tags[tags.length] = “nutritional information”;
blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “Great day for phonetic cognates”;

blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “Cartoon: No Trauma Obama”;

blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “On Panner ruling, make it fast”;
cats[cats.length] = “Editorials”;

blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “Overexposure, etc.”;

blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “Letters to the editor: landslides, Israel/Gaza, Obama fantasy”;
cats[cats.length] = “Letters”;

blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “Letters to the editor: Mileage, gas tax proposals fuel debate”;
cats[cats.length] = “Letters”;

blogs[blogs.length] = “3501”; titles[titles.length] = “Preparing the proper fiscal stimulus package”;
cats[cats.length] = “Editorials”;

function dedupe(theArray) {
var deduped = new Object;for (var i = 0; i < theArray.length; i++) {
deduped[theArray[i]] = theArray[i];}
var unique = new Array;for (var k in deduped) {
unique.push(deduped[k]);}
unique.toString();
result[result.length] = unique;
}

dedupe(blogs);dedupe(titles);dedupe(cats);dedupe(tags);

var OASappendquery = “bpblogs=[” + result[0] + “]&bptitles=[” + result[1] + “]&bpcats=[” + result[2] + “]&bptags=[” + result[3] + “]”;

addpdata(‘bpblogs’, escape(vs_blog_data));
addpdata(‘bptitles’, escape(vs_blog_title));
addpdata(‘bptags’, escape(vs_blog_tags));
addpdata(‘bpcats’, escape(vs_blog_data));

COMMENTS (46)Post a comment
Posted by dmbones on 01/05/09 at 8:02AM

Greetings Harris,

Thank you for your comments. I couldn’t agree with you more. Moses and Muhammad are Messengers from the same God, although separated in history by thousands of years. Their essential message to humanity, as Messengers from all of the world’s major religions agree, is one of ethical reciprocity.

The central teaching of all of the religions is the same:

Bahá’í Faith:
“Ascribe not to any soul that which thou wouldst not have ascribed to thee, and say not that which thou doest not.” “Blessed is he who preferreth his brother before himself.” Baha’u’llah

Brahmanism: “This is the sum of Dharma [duty]: Do naught unto others which would cause you pain if done to you”. Mahabharata, 5:151

Buddhism:
Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful.” Udana-Varga 5:18

Christianity:
“And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.” Luke 6:31, King James Version.

Confucianism:
“Do not do to others what you do not want them to do to you” Analects 15:23

Ancient Egyptian:
“Do for one who may do for you, that you may cause him thus to do.” The Tale of the Eloquent Peasant, 109 – 110 Translated by R.B. Parkinson. The original dates to 1970 to 1640 BCE and may be the earliest version ever written.

Hinduism:
This is the sum of duty: do not do to others what would cause pain if done to you. Mahabharata 5:151

Humanism:
“Don’t do things you wouldn’t want to have done to you, British Humanist Society.

Islam: “None of you [truly] believes until he wishes for his brother what he wishes for himself.” Number 13 of Imam “Al-Nawawi’s Forty Hadiths.”

Jainism:
“In happiness and suffering, in joy and grief, we should regard all creatures as we regard our own self.” Lord Mahavira, 24th Tirthankara

Judaism:
“…thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.”, Leviticus 19:18
“What is hateful to you, do not to your fellow man. This is the law: all the rest is commentary.” Talmud, Shabbat 31a.

Native American Spirituality:
“Respect for all life is the foundation.” The Great Law of Peace.
“All things are our relatives; what we do to everything, we do to ourselves. All is really One.” Black Elk

Roman Pagan Religion: “The law imprinted on the hearts of all men is to love the members of society as themselves.”

Shinto:
“The heart of the person before you is a mirror. See there your own form”
“Be charitable to all beings, love is the representative of God.” Ko-ji-ki Hachiman Kasuga

Sikhism:
“Don’t create enmity with anyone as God is within everyone.” Guru Arjan Devji 259
“No one is my enemy, none a stranger and everyone is my friend.” Guru Arjan Dev : AG 1299

Sufism: “The basis of Sufism is consideration of the hearts and feelings of others. If you haven’t the will to gladden someone’s heart, then at least beware lest you hurt someone’s heart, for on our path, no sin exists but this.” Dr. Javad Nurbakhsh, Master of the Nimatullahi Sufi Order.

Taoism:
“Regard your neighbor’s gain as your own gain, and your neighbor’s loss as your own loss.” T’ai Shang Kan Ying P’ien.

Unitarian:
“The inherent worth and dignity of every person;”
“Justice, equity and compassion in human relations…. ”
“The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all;”
“We affirm and promote respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.” Unitarian principles.

Wicca: “An it harm no one, do what thou wilt” (i.e. do what ever you will, as long as it harms nobody, including yourself). One’s will is to be carefully thought out in advance of action. This is called the Wiccan Rede.

Yoruba: (Nigeria): “One going to take a pointed stick to pinch a baby bird should first try it on himself to feel how it hurts.”

Zoroastrianism:
“Whatever is disagreeable to yourself do not do unto others.” Shayast-na-Shayast 13:29
Humanity has been consistently informed throughout history on the path to peace and security, but we have failed thus far to live up to what we know is right. How long indeed…!

Passages taken from: http://www.religioustolerance.org/reciproc.htm

Posted by portlandpoet on 01/05/09 at 9:07AM

Here’s a thought; how about if we just leave everyone’s God out of the scenerio? Why can’t everyone realize that the impetus behind these centuries of killing each other is “God”; whether it’s your God or the other guy’s.

In the Holy Bible for example; there were only 4 human beings on earth before the first murder occured. Cain killed his brother and 1/4th of the world’s population was wiped out. Later; God wiped out the entire population of the earth save Noah’s family and 2 of each animal species.

According to the same book; the end is no more promising than the beginning. The battle of Armageddon will take place here on earth and “the blood will be as high as the horse’s mouth”.

To many people in the Middle East are willing to strap explosives to their bodies and blow themselves and anyone in the vicinity up in the name of their God. Not only do they not consider this a bad thing; it is thee thing that will ensure that they get to the promise land.

How much blood has to seep into the sands of The Middle East land before their own Martin Luther King steps forward, condems the violence and convinces the warring factions that their sons and daughters will continue dying until someone steps up and says “enough”!

The Gaza Strip and the political and military battles that are fought in an attempt to claim it are both built on sand and will crumble and blow away with the winds. How can you look into your children’s eyes and not realize that no God would want them brutally killed; especially in his name.

All I am saying is give peace a chance.

Posted by dtroutma on 01/05/09 at 9:53AM

I just find it interesting that the bloodiest and most heartless “religions”(with their hundreds of warring sub-sects) on earth today all use the same baseline book of laws, the Old Testament. The only two real laws seem to be: “Do as I say, not as I do.”, and “Do unto others, before they can do it to you.”

It’s also interesting that the battles rage over one of the least valuable parcels of land on Earth, it doesn’t even have oil under it!

Posted by xlntzee56 on 01/05/09 at 10:05AM

Mr. Zafar,
Very thoughtful article. Well said!

Posted by goldfoot on 01/05/09 at 10:07AM

Shalom, Harris Zafar,
I was very impressed with your letter and am thankful to be able to have a dialogue with you. I appreciate your thoughtful outlook on today’s situation in Gaza.
May I point out some facts that were omitted. Israel has not closed the gate in Gaza for no reason. It’s only in response to the constant shelling that Hamas has done since 2001. Hamas shells; we close the gate. For 8 years Israel has been shelled. What would Arab countries do if this happened to them? What did Iran (not an Arab country) and Iraq do to each other? We didn’t go in and slaughter people in response. We tried every civilized method to get Hamas to stop, and it didn’t work. Finally, even with a peace party with Olmert, after 8 years, we have had enough. Weren’t you amazed that Hamas shot and destroyed electric sources from Israel whereby Israel was still giving Gaza electricity? They destroyed their own source of power and then cried foul. It’s like the child who kills his parents and then cries that he’s an orphan.
As to the difference in casualties, it is shocking that their casualties benefit them. They can cry to the international world how terrible we are. We have an army that is pinpointing targets of the source of rockets, missiles, and mortars. They shoot these into our southern population indiscriminately, hitting civilians. We’re not trying to kill civilians. They are. We protect our people with bomb shelters. They put their arms amid their women and children.
They are also terrorizing our people. After 8 years they have better and better missiles that are reaching far more of Israel. We are forced into this. When the “Palestinians” change their charter to accept Israel as being there and not try to wipe us out, and to live within the concept of the Muslim religion as you speak of it, we will have reached peace. It’s too bad that you’re not one of the leaders. You sound like a very wise person. Remember, Jews don’t want to take a life either. Our toast is “L’Chaim! To life. That’s all life.

Posted by johnsonc20 on 01/05/09 at 10:53AM

Goldfoot,

Why respond so negatively to this heartfelt plea to both sides to follow the peaceful tenets contained within their own religions? Is it necessary for you to justify Israel’s actions?

I think that Mr. Zafar has made some interesting points and it would behoove you to reflect on what the “L’Chaim” toast means if it is given at the same time massive death from the sky is being dealt by those doing the toasting.

It is time for ALL of us to walk the talk. That includes Israel, who is in the stronger military position and therefore has the most need to show mercy.

May God bless us ALL.

Posted by dontsmoke on 01/05/09 at 11:29AM

I agree with johnsonc20. Mr. Zafar is not taking sides in this battle; he is simply pointing out that the violence must stop.

Even though you may be justified in your response Goldfoot; it’s time to stop the tit for tat about who is attacking whom and who owns what strip of land. Dialogue is the only way to stop the killing not continuing to prove that you and your people are right and someone else (your enemy), is wrong. Mr. Zafar’s article is a good start toward such dialogue.

I too would defend my home and protect my family with every means available to me but if I could sit down with those who wish me harm and come to an agreement so that we could live in peace forever; let’s talk.

The natural response to violence is to justify your own actions by saying you were attacked first. Unfortunately; in the Middle East that argument could go back to the days of Moses and will never be decided. Don’t argue about who’s ox was gored first, just stop goring the other guys ox and get along for the sake of your children.

Peace to all in the Middle East and around the world.

Posted by dell4100 on 01/05/09 at 11:41AM

Islam is a violent religion and you can dress it up any way you like, but it still comes down to the same thing. If it looks like a duck, it is most certainly a duck! Actions speak louder than words and Hamas has proven to the world that they are nothing but a bunch of rabid dogs!

Posted by dontsmoke on 01/05/09 at 12:03PM

dell4100 do you think you would be more inclined to sit down with your Mid Eastern brother if he started the conversation by calling you a rabid dog or if he approached you in an intelligent peaceful manner as Harris Zafar does in his article?

The State of Israel was born the same year as I, 1949. I have lived a peaceful and fruitful life here in the United States for those 60 years and my children have grown up knowing nothing but peace and love.

I spent a year in combat in the Viet Nam war and came to realize that war is not the solution to man’s problems; peace is.

Why don’t you stop calling names and join in the peace process so children in your part of the world can enjoy the next 60 years in peace as well.

We’re all brothers and that includes you dell4100.

Simply choose to stop the violence.

Posted by ozrms on 01/05/09 at 12:06PM

Palestine is an OCCUPIED territory. Blaming those who choose to fight the occupation with homemade rockets (that are wholly symbolic and highly ineffective) as responsible for the killing and maiming of thousands of civilians is like blaming Anne Frank for the murder of her family.

Moralizing notwithstanding, Palestine has endured 60 years of occupation, under a colonialist Israel-U.S. regime. Most of Palestine remains unarmed, impoverished, and weak. Attacking this population with white phosphorous, cluster bombs, navy shells and 33,000 troops is absolutely ridiculous.

Mark my words, this incursion will be as effective as the U.S. occupation of Iraq. It will galvanize more and more people to fight against occupying forces and continue a war that has already gone on for much too long.

Posted by patpilot on 01/05/09 at 12:22PM

The problem, as I see it, is that organized religions are organized by people. Despite all the good intents of their deity, messages of faith, love, and worship are suborned by those leaders who bend their religions to suit personal and political needs. When religions are organized inside of geo-political boundaries, that is, when the state becomes the religion becomes the state, religions gain the killing efficiency of modern weaponry and tactics. You can say “Not my religion” but you conveniently forget things like inquisitions, crusades, witch trials, and the destruction of much of the extant civilization of the New World. Mark Twain said the bible has an omission; “Ye shall be indifferent as to what your neighbor’s religion is.” Until religions are ready to accept that concept, humanity will continue to suffer in the names of gods.

Posted by kzvezda on 01/05/09 at 1:38PM

Posted by ozrms on 01/05/09 at 12:06PM
Blaming those who choose to fight the occupation with homemade rockets (that are wholly symbolic and highly ineffective)
——-
Those “symbolic” rockets you speak of have killed people and disrupted the lives of many more. It’s easy for you to say “symbolic” from halfway around the world. If someone targeted you with those “symbolic” rockets, you’d be singing another tune.

Posted by kzvezda on 01/05/09 at 1:41PM

If both parties instilled humanity, mercy and forgiveness into themselves, perhaps God would find more value in their prayers. But how many must die before the God-given qualities of humanity and peace prevail?
—————
Unfortunately, when dealing with fanatics like Hamas (whose charter calls for the destruction of Israel), the answer is that many must die.

Israel’s spokesman said today that if Israel was guaranteed that the rocket fire would stop permanently, they’d pull out of Gaza immediately. But the likelihood of that approaches zero.

Posted by dmbones on 01/05/09 at 1:59PM

Hi Pat,

Instead of Twain’s call for tolerance, I prefer to think that all of the world’s religions are essentially the same. They come from the same source and they tell us essentially the same thing at their core, differing only in the transient realities of the time their founders appeared on earth. For example, eating pork is forbidden in the Jewish Talmud, not because pork is unclean, but because people didn’t know then how to avoid trichinosis. Religious truth is relative to the time in which it appeared. If we could just see this for what it is, then much of the so-called culture wars and clash of civilizations would be moot.

I wholeheartedly agree with you that the good intentions of the Prophets is waylaid by the clergy for their own small vested institutional interests. It’s a matter of historical record. The clergy are by far the ones most responsible for the regress of civilization, including the wars we are involved in today.
But, as for democracy and religion, Twain is right: our neighbors religion or lack of it is subsumed in being an American.

Posted by dmbones on 01/05/09 at 2:10PM

Harris,

In earlier online blogs I’ve had exchanges with self-proclaimed Muslim scholars. One that troubled me was with a man honest enough to admit that telling the truth to a non-Muslim was not necessary as apostates are undeserving. Could you comment on this, please?

I would really like to have more Muslim voices online here. I applaud your courage in standing up for Muhammad’s teaching, Peace be upon Him. If more of your co-religionists were as brave, we could make real progress in seeing one another as sharing common interests.

Thanks again for your calming voice. It’s a rare and timely input.

Posted by lennyp on 01/05/09 at 3:37PM

Shalom

The god the Palestinians pray to and the god the Jews pray to are one and the same, the god of Abraham. If either one or both are god’s chosen, I, for one, would rather not be god’s choice.

As an American Jew, thank you. When the Muslims ruled the “world” it was a time of great enlightenment, learning and tolerance for those that lived under their rule including Jews. I believe, left to their own devices the Palestinians and Jews have the ability to create a wonderful society for themselves and their children. Both the Palestinians and Jew have much more in common then divides them. There are far more reasons for them to be friends than enemies.

Both allow their fundamentalist leaders to use them for their leaders own aims. These leaders display an utter disregard for well-being of their peoples under the guise of what they want their god to be. Funny how their leader’s god always agrees with them rather than they agree with god.

Here is an excellent piece written by a Jewish writer that I suggest everyone read:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marty-kaplan/eyeless-in-gaza_b_155204.html

From what you have written, I would be proud to call you a friend.

as-salaamu ‘alaykum

Posted by zidar on 01/05/09 at 4:13PM

Which side has God chosen? With the score running 5 dead Jews and 500 dead Arabs, looks to me like he’s taken the side of the Jews.

Posted by portlandpoet on 01/05/09 at 4:34PM

Not necessarily zidar. If the ultimate goal is to die and meet your God, then more Arab’s prayers are being answered. See how rediculous the issue is regarding who’s side God is on?

How about we stop killing each other and let “God” decide when it’s our time to go and meet him ?

Posted by imoksoami on 01/05/09 at 4:53PM

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/06/gaza-israel-hamas

LOL, a letter to gullible idiots from a leader of Hamas. Now Arafat was poisened by Israel and no bombs have been delivered by Hamas, LOL.

Posted by dell4100 on 01/05/09 at 5:39PM

dontsmoke, should I try to talk to them before or after they cut my head off? Wake up fool, terrorists don’t want peace. They want to impose their religious views on others!

Posted by dell4100 on 01/05/09 at 5:44PM

People under attack have two choices, either defend themselves or lay down and die. I choose the former rather than the latter. I do not impose my beliefs on others and wish to be afforded that same courtesy. However, I am not naive nor was I born yesterday. Terrorists do not want peace, they want to cut off your head, because you are not one of them. So each individual needs to decide whether they want to stand up and fight or be a doormat! Your choice.

Posted by Laetitia on 01/05/09 at 5:58PM

The day man created god our fate was sealed. Too bad we still haven’t figured that out in the 21st century. Long live superstition; come to think of it that is all that is going to survive.

Posted by BishopDave on 01/05/09 at 6:03PM

Dear Harris,

I’ve read your article in the Newark airport on my way from Portland to Tel Aviv. I and 40 some other bishops of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America are on our way to Israel right now – primarily to visit friends in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Jordan and the Holy Land. This community includes both Palestinian Christians and Israeli Christians who paint for us a picture similar to yours. I wish more people had your heart and insight. Thank you for writing.

Anyone interested in our trip can read more at

Dave

Posted by BishopDave on 01/05/09 at 6:05PM

So much for my html coding! Try http://blogs.elca.org/09cobacademy/

Dave

Posted by xlntzee56 on 01/05/09 at 6:17PM

dell4100 says: “Wake up fool, terrorists don’t want peace. They want to impose their religious views on others!”
So, by your definition, that includes the religious right-wing Christians you so often align yourself with dell.

Posted by bloggod on 01/05/09 at 8:09PM

Zafar says:

“Both Israelis and Palestinians are religious people, but when it comes to matters concerning one another, their respective leaders toss their religious beliefs to the side and act with raw emotion, with disregard for the value of life.”
_____________

those ordering the killing on both sides aren’t “leaders;” they are following ignorance.

the citizens of these nations are NOT all of the same cloth. just like the USA:
(hello world, we here in Oregon ain’t Bush.)
Olmert is a convicted criminal.

Bush is sliding out the back door as bloody as can be, shredders deleting history 24-7.

i think the Gaza war is what Biden meant about Obama being tested right off with a crisis. an extra crisis that is.

Posted by sameric on 01/05/09 at 8:49PM

At the core, is this really about religion at all? From what I’ve read Islam and Judaism have more in common than differences – especially when each is compared to Christianity. Just maybe this continuing mess is all about keeping control of the masses through the provision of a common enemy.

Posted by jaybug45 on 01/05/09 at 9:56PM

This is about OIL! When the price did not increase after OPEC cut production, then the rockets started launching around the clock. Thank you Ahmedinijhad.

Eye for an eye? So Isreal is supposed to launch cheesy rockets into Gaza, and it’s according to the law? Okay. Sounds stupid to me, but I didn’t write the law.

What I fear is that genocide is going to happen someday. And that until then we will have no peace. Perhaps when America is not dependent upon foreign oil for our energy, we will let the Middle East go Rwanda itself. Nothing else has worked. And I fear nothing else will.

Maybe they need a little M.A.D.ness to figure things out. Worked for us anyway, ask Russia, they still exist to be able to ask.

Posted by amalfi01 on 01/06/09 at 9:43AM

The facts of life: Islam allows only three ways in which the true believer can confront the infidel: Conversion, submission or death. There is no option for peaceful coexistence. The infidel ignores this at his peril.

Posted by dell4100 on 01/06/09 at 11:58AM

xlntzee56, I must take issue with your assertion that I am aligned with the right wing religious zealots. I am an agnostic and if you don’t know what that means, then look it up. Since you are always making excuses for Hamas, does that mean I can assume you are also a terrorist?

Posted by dell4100 on 01/06/09 at 12:00PM

amalfi01 hit the nail on the head. Common sense seems to elude most of these other posters. They won’t realize their error in judgement, until they are looking at their bodies from their severed heads!

Posted by rwnobles on 01/06/09 at 1:20PM

I think the point of “symbolic” is that the Hamas rockets are not very effective.

When you have two equally wrong poeple, the one with the more effective weaponry is more dangerous.

Israel has killed 100 Innocent lives for every single Israeli that is killed. Talk about “actions speak louder than words” dell4100!

Irael has the more accurate weaponry but they are killing 100 times the civilians. It is hard for me to imagine that that is not an intentional attempt at genocide.

Posted by harriszafar on 01/06/09 at 1:49PM

dmbones: Thank you for your question. It is rather easy for someone to proclaim themselves a scholar online. The example you cite is quite disturbing because this so-called scholar is making a claim that has no basis in Islam. In all my readings of Islamic scripture, I have seen countless references calling for honesty and truthfulness. The Prophet Muhammad even said that dishonesty leads to vice and vice leads to hell. And he never said “except when you lie to a non-Muslim.” That sounds ridiculous, and I am sorry that a Muslim told you this. It is not true.

BishopDave: Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I will certainly keep an eye on your blog to see how things are going for you. Please convey my greetings and message of Peace to those you will be working with.

I do not find meaningless abuse of anyone’s faith to be beneficial nor genuine, which is why I will not address the comments by some posters who only want to defame a group or a religion. All I can do is pray that someday their sense of tolerance and cooperation will awaken so that more of us can respectfully coexist and solve real issues with meaningful discussion. This way, we can put our words into action. Thank you all once again.

Posted by amalfi01 on 01/06/09 at 3:05PM

rwnobles

Hamas broke the ceasefire. So the best thing to tell them is not to bring a knife to a gunfight. The Israelis have a right to live in peace. When the Palestinians allow Israel the right to exist, and exist in peace there will be peace.

Posted by rwnobles on 01/06/09 at 3:14PM

amalfio1: So a few militants tossing glorified rocks justifies Israel’s killing of thousands of innocent civilians?

I agree with Mr. Harris, both sides of this fight are wrong. I just have sympathy for the innocent lives that are being taken. So few innocent Israelis have been hurt, so I have little sympathy on that side in comparison to mounting innocent deaths on the Palestinian side.

I wish they would both stop. I wish they both were inneffective at killing innocence. Israel is just very effective in killing innocent people. The death tollspeaks for itself, 100:01

Posted by Abdulameer on 01/06/09 at 3:49PM

Harris Zafar is a business analyst in the information technology industry. What are his credentials for teaching us the truth about Islam? He writes: “As a practicing Muslim, I’m critical of Muslims who don’t act according to the teachings of Islam.” AND “Do those who fire them not understand the Holy Quran when it repeatedly says “create not disorder in the earth” or even when it says that killing even one person is like killing all of mankind? Reverence for life is a part of Islam,..” But, what, exactly, are the teachings of the Koran? They are NOT what Zafar thinks they are. One wonders whether he has even bothered to read the Koran. Please see next post.

Posted by Abdulameer on 01/06/09 at 3:58PM

Here are some “troublesome” passages from the Koran. Any reader can verify on the Internet that the Koran really does say these things.

–Surely the vilest of animals in Allah’s sight are those who disbelieve. (8.55)

— The unbelievers are your inveterate enemy. (4:101)

— Mohammed is God’s apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another. (48:29).

— It is unlawful for a believer to kill another believer, accidents excepted. (4:92)

— Believers, take neither the Jews nor the Christians for your friends. (5:51)

— Make war on them (non-Moslems)until idolatry shall cease and God’s religion shall reign supreme. (8:40)

— Fight against them until idolatry is no more and God’s religion reigns supreme. (2:193)

— The true believers fight for the cause of God, but the infidels fight for the devil. Fight then against the friends of Satan. (4:76)

— We will put terror into the hearts of the unbelievers. (3:151)

— I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, strike off the very tips of their fingers. (8:12)

Muhammad, who all religious Moslems are required to consider the perfect model to follow, said this:
“You (i.e. Muslims) will fight with the Jews till some of them will hide behind stones. The stones will (betray them) saying, ‘O ‘Abdullah (i.e. slave of Allah)! There is a Jew hiding behind me; so kill him.’ ”

“I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, “None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,..”

“Whoever changes his Islamic religion, kill him.” Vol. 9:57

“No Muslim should be killed for killing a Kafir”

There are many more quotations like these from the Koran and the sayings of Muhammad (Hadith). What will Zahar tell us about these verses which are considered sacrosanct by all believing Moslems — even if they have never read the Koran.

Posted by Abdulameer on 01/06/09 at 4:07PM

DMBONES writes above: “The central teaching of all of the religions is the same:…” This is totally absurd. This makes as much sense as to say that all philosophies are the same, or that all political ideologies are the same. In fact, Islam is totally unique because, in addition to a set of rituals, it also contains an ideology, that is, a plan for organizing all of society and then imposing this plan on the entire world, willingly or by force. No other religion has such an ideology built into it. Here is what a Moslem religious scholar says about Islam:

Dr. Muhammad al Alkhuli writes:
Islam is a religion, but not in the western meaning of religion. The western connotation of the term “religion” is something between the believer and God. Islam as a religion organizes all aspects of life on both the individual and national levels.
Islam organizes your relations with God, with yourself, with your children, with your relatives, with your neighbor, with your guest, and with other brethren. Islam clearly establishes your duties and rights in all those relationships.
Islam establishes a clear system of worship, civil rights, laws of marriage and divorce, laws of inheritance, code of behavior, what not to drink, what to wear, and what not to wear, how to worship God, how to govern, the laws of war and peace, when to go to war, when to make peace, the law of economics, and the laws of buying and selling. Islam is a complete code of life.
Islam is not for the mosque only, it is for daily life, a guide to life in all its aspects: socially, economically, and politically.
Islam is [a] complete constitution”

Here is what one of the most respected and widely read Islamic writers of the 20th century said, Abul Maududi:

“The goal of Islam is to rule the entire world and submit all of mankind to the faith of Islam. Any nation or power that gets in the way of that goal, Islam will fight and destroy.”

Does business analyst Zahar pretend to know more about Islam than the respected Islamic religious authorities and scholars? More than Muhammad? More than Allah (the Koran)????

Posted by rwnobles on 01/06/09 at 4:13PM

Hope I don’t double post due to “error on page”

Wow! News flash! Believers lives are more valuable than non-belivers lives in the Muslim religion!

Nearly every religion teaches that.

Julia Sweeney has documented a lot of equally objectionable quotes from the Bible.

Can we agree that religion is a big part of problems in this world?

Posted by Abdulameer on 01/06/09 at 4:20PM

Dmbones write this fatally misleading comment: “Islam: “None of you [truly] believes until he wishes for his brother what he wishes for himself.” Number 13 of Imam “Al-Nawawi’s Forty Hadiths.”

This is fatally misleading because it looks something like the Golden Rule. In fact, it is no such thing. Notice that the quotation uses the word “brother”, not “others”, not “fellow man”, not “all creatures”, like the other religions say. Everything depends here on the meaning of “brother”. Non-Moslems need to know that in Islam “brother” refers ONLY to another Moslem, NOT to non-Moslems. How do we know? Muhammad himself said that believers (i.e. Moslems) are brothers to one another.
And, remember the injunction from the Koran cited above:
“Mohammed is God’s apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another.” (48:29).
This sure doesn’t sound like the Golden Rule to me!

Posted by Abdulameer on 01/06/09 at 4:37PM

rwnobles errs when he wants us to believe that all religions are equally bad or that the Bible has verses that are equally objectionable compared to the Koran. If you look at the specific verses of the Bible and the specific verses of the Koran, you will see that they are not equivalent. Of course, there are plenty of cruelties in the Bible. However, they are limited to those ancient times, places and peoples. Christians and Jews do not follow those precepts today. The verses of the Koran apply generally to non-Moslems. Furthermore, all Moslems are required to believe that the Koran is Allah’s literal word — perfect, complete, immutable and valid for all of eternity. This is different from the Bible. We speak of the “Five Books of Moses”. Nobody refers to them as the “Five Books of God”. We speak of the Gospels of Mark, Luke, Matthew and John. Only metaphorically do we refer to the Gospels as the “Word of God”. In Islam, it would be considered blasphemy (punishable by death according to Islamic law!) to call the Koran “the Book of Muhammad”. To sum up:
1) The specific passages of cruelty in the Bible are fundamentally different from the specific passages of cruelty/bigotry/violence in the Koran;
2) Christians and Jews do not view the Bible in the same way that Moslems view the Koran.
These differences are crucial.

Posted by jaybug45 on 01/06/09 at 5:37PM

It’s only a horror when you shoot at someone hiding in a school? Not when you shoot from a school?

All you Gahndi-ists remember that his non-violence worked on the United Kingdom, it didn’t do squat for the 5 wars India had with Pakistan after independence. Reasonableness only works with reasonable people. This is why cops have guns, for the unreasonable people.

Israel has had to end being reasonable regarding their enemies. The only other choice is to allow rockets to rain down on Israel ad infinitum.

Posted by amalfi01 on 01/06/09 at 5:41PM

rwnobles

Your ignorance of religions in general is really astounding!

You said this: “Wow! News flash! Believers lives are more valuable than non-belivers lives in the Muslim religion!

Nearly every religion teaches that.”

You need to start doing some reading.

Posted by thebigjim on 01/06/09 at 7:38PM

How did the media scrub the blood out of the coverage of 9/11?
bloody pictures of broken and dead Arab children are all over the place.
I guess no one is paying attention. Too busy? you got other worries?

Posted by Love4all on 01/06/09 at 8:52PM

AbdulAmeer

Peace be upon you.

1.) There is no punishment for blasphamy in Islam. None what so ever. This is fact. Search www.alislam.org if you would like further evidence.

2.) ANY religious book can be taken out of context if the intent is impure. The Qur’an says it is a “guidance for the righteous” – meaning also that those who have a twisted heart will find twisted meanings to verses. Every verse from the Qur’an you cited as “violent” was taken out of context and refers to particular situations, many of which the very laws of the US agree with whole heartedly.

Your logic that the Bible refers to “ancient laws and people” is pathetic and immature. Would a Christian ever admit they follow a book that is ancient and outdated? Would they admit that their book has flaws? Thus, if they follow they book, they must accept what is in the book.

The Bible clearly gives advice of violence and compulsion. For example, the following verses are from Deuteronomy. As you can see, in this case I’m not picking one random verse, but 8 verses to show that those who follow the Bible are commanded to kill those who are not with them, i.e. disbelievers.

20:10 When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it.

20:11 And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee.

20:12 And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it:

20:13 And when the LORD thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword:

20:14 But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the LORD thy God hath given thee.

20:15 Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations.

20:16 But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:

20:17 But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:

***********************************************
Now, only a fool would think that followers of the Bible are bent on killing non followers of the Bible – despite what these verses say.

Likewise, only a fool would think that Islam (the very word which means Peace) would teach Muslims to kill non Muslims.

If you want a living example of Islam practiced peacefully, search the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community in the news around the world. You will find that this community comprises of 10’s of millions of Muslims in 200 countries of the world – all dedicated to peace. In their 120 year history, there has been NOT A SINGLE incident of violence. They have been martyred, exiled, beaten, and tortured, but have always responded with love and peace. They have opened schools for children of all back grounds to become educated in. They have opened hospitals for all people to get free medicine from. They feed over 50,000 families in America alone every year, with their own financial donations.

And they do this because the Qur’an and Muhammad (sa) teach peace and love for mankind.

So don’t believe me, but believe the actions of tens of millions of Muslims over the past 120 years. Actions speak louder than words my friend, and the pristine record of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community speaks for itself.

And just for the record, don’t bother pointing out I’m not a Muslim scholar – I never claimed to be one anyway. For that matter, neither did Mr. Zafar. It wasn’t his scholarship talking anyway, it was his righteousness.

Posted by amalfi01 on 01/06/09 at 10:57PM

Love4all

The examples you quote are from the Old Testament. When Christ was born and died on the cross, the Old Testament became just history. Nowhere in the New Testament can you find Christ or his apostles advocating anything but love and forgiveness.

The Invasion of Gaza: “Operation Cast Lead”, Part of a Broader Israeli Military-Intelligence Agenda

by Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, January 4, 2009

The aerial bombings and the ongoing ground invasion of Gaza by Israeli ground forces must be analysed in a historical context. Operation “Cast Lead” is a carefully planned undertaking, which is part of a broader military-intelligence agenda first formulated by the government of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2001:

“Sources in the defense establishment said Defense Minister Ehud Barak instructed the Israel Defense Forces to prepare for the operation over six months ago, even as Israel was beginning to negotiate a ceasefire agreement with Hamas.”(Barak Ravid, Operation “Cast Lead”: Israeli Air Force strike followed months of planning, Haaretz, December 27, 2008)

It was Israel which broke the truce on the day of the US presidential elections, November 4:

“Israel used this distraction to break the ceasefire between itself and Hamas by bombing the Gaza strip.  Israel claimed this violation of the ceasefire was to prevent Hamas from digging tunnels into Israeli territory.

The very next day, Israel launched a terrorizing siege of Gaza, cutting off food, fuel, medical supplies and other necessities in an attempt to “subdue” the Palestinians while at the same time engaging in armed incursions.

In response, Hamas and others in Gaza again resorted to firing crude, homemade, and mainly inaccurate rockets into Israel.  During the past seven years, these rockets have been responsible for the deaths of 17 Israelis.  Over the same time span, Israeli Blitzkrieg assaults have killed thousands of Palestinians, drawing worldwide protest but falling on deaf ears at the UN.” (Shamus Cooke, The Massacre in Palestine and the Threat of a Wider War, Global Research, December 2008)

Planned Humanitarian Disaster

On December 8, US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte was in Tel Aviv for discussions with his Israeli counterparts including the director of Mossad, Meir Dagan.  “Operation Cast Lead” was initiated two days day after Christmas. It was coupled with a carefully designed international Public Relations campaign under the auspices of Israel’s Foreign Ministry. Hamas’ military targets are not the main objective. Operation “Cast Lead” is intended, quite deliberately, to trigger civilian casualities.  What we are dealing with is a “planned humanitarian disaster” in Gaza in a densly populated urban area. (See map below)

The longer term objective of this plan, as formulated by Israeli policy makers, is the expulsion of Palestinians from Palestinian lands:

“Terrorize the civilian population, assuring maximal destruction of property and cultural resources… The daily life of the Palestinians must be rendered unbearable: They should be locked up in cities and towns, prevented from exercising normal economic life, cut off from workplaces, schools and hospitals, This will encourage emigration and weaken the resistance to future expulsions” Ur Shlonsky, quoted by Ghali Hassan, Gaza: The World’s Largest Prison, Global Research, 2005)

“Operation Justified Vengeance” A turning point has been reached. Operation “Cast Lead” is part of the broader military-intelligence operation initiated at the outset of the Ariel Sharon government in 2001. It was under Sharon’s “Operation Justified Vengeance” that  F-16 fighter planes were initially used to bomb Palestinian cities.  “Operation Justified Vengeance” was presented in July 2001 to the Israeli government of Ariel Sharon by IDF chief of staff Shaul Mofaz, under the title “The Destruction of the Palestinian Authority and Disarmament of All Armed Forces”.

“A contingency plan, codenamed Operation Justified Vengeance, was drawn up last June [2001] to reoccupy all of the West Bank and possibly the Gaza Strip at a likely cost of “hundreds” of Israeli casualties.” (Washington Times, 19 March 2002).

According to Jane’s ‘Foreign Report’ (July 12, 2001) the Israeli army under Sharon had updated its plans for an “all-out assault to smash the Palestinian authority, force out leader Yasser Arafat and kill or detain its army”.   “Bloodshed Justification” The “Bloodshed Justification” was an essential component of the military-intelligence agenda. The killing of Palestinian civilians was justified on “humanitarian grounds.” Israeli military operations were carefully timed to coincide with the suicide attacks:

The assault would be launched, at the government’s discretion, after a big suicide bomb attack in Israel, causing widespread deaths and injuries, citing the bloodshed as justification. (Tanya Reinhart, Evil Unleashed, Israel’s move to destroy the Palestinian Authority is a calculated plan, long in the making, Global Research, December 2001, emphasis added)

The Dagan Plan  “Operation Justified Vengeance” was also referred to as the “Dagan Plan”, named after General (ret.) Meir Dagan, who currently heads Mossad, Israel’s intelligence agency.  Reserve General Meir Dagan was Sharon’s national security adviser during the 2000 election campaign. The plan was apparently drawn up prior to Sharon’s election as Prime Minister in February 2001. “According to Alex Fishman writing in Yediot Aharonot, the Dagan Plan consisted in destroying the Palestinian authority and putting Yasser Arafat ‘out of the game’.” (Ellis Shulman, “Operation Justified Vengeance”: a Secret Plan to Destroy the Palestinian Authority, March 2001):

“As reported in the Foreign Report [Jane] and disclosed locally by Maariv, Israel’s invasion plan — reportedly dubbed Justified Vengeance — would be launched immediately following the next high-casualty suicide bombing, would last about a month and is expected to result in the death of hundreds of Israelis and thousands of Palestinians. (Ibid, emphasis added)

The “Dagan Plan” envisaged the so-called “cantonization” of the Palestinian territories whereby the West Bank and Gaza would be totally cut off from one other, with separate “governments” in each of the territories. Under this scenario, already envisaged in 2001, Israel would:

“negotiate separately with Palestinian forces that are dominant in each territory-Palestinian forces responsible for security, intelligence, and even for the Tanzim (Fatah).” The plan thus closely resembles the idea of “cantonization” of Palestinian territories, put forth by a number of ministers.” Sylvain Cypel, The infamous ‘Dagan Plan’ Sharon’s plan for getting rid of Arafat, Le Monde, December 17, 2001)


From Left to Right: Dagan, Sharon, Halevy

The Dagan Plan has established continuity in the military-intelligence agenda. In the wake of the 2000 elections, Meir Dagan was assigned a key role. “He became Sharon’s “go-between” in security issues with President’s Bush’s special envoys Zinni and Mitchell.”  He was subsequently appointed Director of the Mossad by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in August 2002. In the post-Sharon period, he remained head of Mossad. He was reconfirmed in his position as Director of Israeli Intelligence by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in June 2008.  Meir Dagan, in coordination with his US counterparts, has been in charge of various military-intelligence operations. It is worth noting that Meir Dagan as a young Colonel had worked closely with defense minister Ariel Sharon in the raids on Palestinian settlements in Beirut in 1982. The 2009 ground invasion of Gaza, in many regards, bear a canny resemblance to the 1982 military operation led by Sharon and Dagan.

Continuity: From Sharon  to Olmert

Olmert and Sharon

It is important to focus on a number of key events which have led up to the killings in Gaza under “Operation Cast Lead”:  1. The assassination in November 2004 of Yaser Arafat. This assassination had been on the drawing board since 1996 under “Operation Fields of Thorns”. According to an October 2000 document “prepared by the security services, at the request of then Prime Minister Ehud Barak, stated that ‘Arafat, the person, is a severe threat to the security of the state [of Israel] and the damage which will result from his disappearance is less than the damage caused by his existence'”. (Tanya Reinhart, Evil Unleashed, Israel’s move to destroy the Palestinian Authority is a calculated plan, long in the making, Global Research, December 2001. Details of the document were published in Ma’ariv, July 6, 2001.).  Arafat’s assassination was ordered in 2003 by the Israeli cabinet. It was approved by the US which vetoed a United Nations Security Resolution condemning the 2003 Israeli Cabinet decision. Reacting to increased Palestinian attacks, in August 2003, Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz declared “all out war” on the militants whom he vowed “marked for death.”

“In mid September, Israel’s government passed a law to get rid of Arafat. Israel’s cabinet for political security affairs declared it “a decision to remove Arafat as an obstacle to peace.” Mofaz threatened; “we will choose the right way and the right time to kill Arafat.” Palestinian Minister Saeb Erekat told CNN he thought Arafat was the next target. CNN asked Sharon spokesman Ra’anan Gissan if the vote meant expulsion of Arafat. Gissan clarified; “It doesn’t mean that. The Cabinet has today resolved to remove this obstacle. The time, the method, the ways by which this will take place will be decided separately, and the security services will monitor the situation and make the recommendation about proper action.” (See Trish Shuh, Road Map for a Decease Plan,  www.mehrnews.com
November 9 2005

The assassination of Arafat was part of the 2001 Dagan Plan. In all likelihood, it was carried out by Israeli Intelligence. It was intended to destroy the Palestinian Authority, foment divisions within Fatah as well as between Fatah and Hamas. Mahmoud Abbas is a Palestinian quisling. He was installed as leader of Fatah, with the approval of Israel and the US, which finance the Palestinian Authority’s paramilitary and security forces.

2. The removal, under the orders of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2005, of all Jewish settlements in Gaza. A Jewish population of over 7,000 was relocated.

“It is my intention [Sharon] to carry out an evacuation – sorry, a relocation – of settlements that cause us problems and of places that we will not hold onto anyway in a final settlement, like the Gaza settlements…. I am working on the assumption that in the future there will be no Jews in Gaza,” Sharon said.” (CBC, March 2004)

The issue of the settlements in Gaza was presented as part of Washington’s “road map to peace”. Celebrated by the Palestinians as a “victory”, this measure was not directed against the Jewish settlers. Quite the opposite: It was part of  the overall covert operation, which consisted  in transforming Gaza into a concentration camp. As long as Jewish settlers were living inside Gaza, the objective of sustaining a large barricaded prison territory could not be achieved. The Implementation of “Operation Cast Lead” required “no Jews in Gaza”.    3. The building of the infamous Apartheid Wall was decided upon at the beginning of the Sharon government. (See Map below).  

4. The next phase was the Hamas election victory in January 2006. Without Arafat, the Israeli military-intelligence architects knew that Fatah under Mahmoud Abbas would loose the elections. This was part of the scenario, which had been envisaged and analyzed well in advance.

With Hamas in charge of the Palestinian authority, using the pretext that Hamas is a terrorist organization, Israel would carry out the process of “cantonization” as formulated under the Dagan plan. Fatah under Mahmoud Abbas would remain formally in charge of the West Bank. The duly elected Hamas government would be confined to the Gaza strip. Ground Attack On January 3, Israeli tanks and infantry entered Gaza in an all out ground offensive:

“The ground operation was preceded by several hours of heavy artillery fire after dark, igniting targets in flames that burst into the night sky. Machine gun fire rattled as bright tracer rounds flashed through the darkness and the crash of hundreds of shells sent up streaks of fire. (AP, January 3, 2009)

Israeli sources have pointed to a lengthy drawn out military operation. It “won’t be easy and it won’t be short,” said Defense Minister Ehud Barak in a TV address.  Israel is not seeking to oblige Hamas “to cooperate”. What we are dealing with is the implementation of the “Dagan Plan” as initially formulated in 2001, which called for:

“an invasion of Palestinian-controlled territory by some 30,000 Israeli soldiers, with the clearly defined mission of destroying the infrastructure of the Palestinian leadership and collecting weaponry currently possessed by the various Palestinian forces, and expelling or killing its military leadership. (Ellis Shulman, op cit, emphasis added)

The broader question is whether Israel in consultation with Washington is intent upon triggering a wider war.

Mass expulsion could occur at some later stage of the ground invasion, were the Israelis to open up Gaza’s borders to allow for an exodus of population. Expulsion was referred to by Ariel Sharon as the “a 1948 style solution”. For Sharon “it is only necessary to find another state for the Palestinians. -‘Jordan is Palestine’ – was the phrase that Sharon coined.” (Tanya Reinhart, op cit)