Peace Homes Aluva

Simplify Building Your Dream Home

Hamas must be represented at the negotiating table. Only then can you get a solution.

Turkey Wants U.S. ‘Balance’

function getSharePasskey() { return ‘ex=1396670400&en=58400e7196dc12e6&ei=5124’;} function getShareURL() { return encodeURIComponent(‘http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/06/opinion/06iht-edcohen.html’); } function getShareHeadline() { return encodeURIComponent(‘Turkey Wants U.S. ‘Balance’’); } function getShareDescription() { return encodeURIComponent(‘In an interview on the eve of Obama's visit to Turkey, the country's prime minister presses for "a new balance" in the U.S. approach to the Middle East.’); } function getShareKeywords() { return encodeURIComponent(‘Turkey,Hamas,Barack Obama,Recep Tayyip Erdogan’); } function getShareSection() { return encodeURIComponent(‘opinion’); } function getShareSectionDisplay() { return encodeURIComponent(‘Op-Ed Columnist’); } function getShareSubSection() { return encodeURIComponent(”); } function getShareByline() { return encodeURIComponent(‘By ROGER COHEN’); } function getSharePubdate() { return encodeURIComponent(‘April 6, 2009’); }

Published: April 5, 2009

LONDON — Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey is a man of brisk, borderline brusque, manner and he does not mince his words: “Hamas must be represented at the negotiating table. Only then can you get a solution.”

Skip to next paragraph

Earl Wilson/The New York Times

Roger Cohen

Readers’ Comments

Share your thoughts.

if (acm.rc) acm.rc.write();

We were seated in his suite at London’s Dorchester Hotel, where a Turkish flag had been hurriedly brought in as official backdrop. Referring to Mahmoud Abbas, the beleaguered Fatah leader and president of the Palestinian Authority, Erdogan said, “You will get nowhere by talking only to Abbas. This is what I tell our Western friends.”

In an interview on the eve of President Barack Obama’s visit to Turkey, his first to a Muslim country since taking office, Erdogan pressed for what he called “a new balance” in the U.S. approach to the Middle East. “Definitely U.S. policy has to change,” he said, if there is to be “a fair, just and all-encompassing solution.”

A firm message from Israel’s best friend in the Muslim Middle East: the status quo is untenable.

How Hamas is viewed is a pivotal issue in the current American Middle East policy review. The victor in 2006 Palestinian elections, Hamas is seen throughout the region as a legitimate resistance movement, a status burnished by its recent inconclusive pounding during Israel’s wretchedly named — and disastrous — “Operation Cast Lead” in Gaza.

The United States and the European Union consider Hamas a terrorist organization. They won’t talk to it until it recognizes Israel, among other conditions. This marginalization has led only to impasse because Hamas, as an entrenched Palestinian political and social movement, cannot be circumvented and will not disappear.

Former Senator George Mitchell, Obama’s Middle East envoy, has expressed support for reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah. I think this should become a U.S. diplomatic priority because it is the only coherent basis for meaningful peace talks. Erdogan called Mitchell “perfectly aware and with a full knowledge, a very positive person whose appointment was a very good step.”

The Turkish prime minister, who leads Justice and Development, or AKP, a party of Islamic inspiration and pragmatic bent, earned hero’s status in the Arab world when he walked out on the Israeli president, Shimon Peres, during a debate earlier this year in Davos. Any regrets?

“If I had failed to do that, it would have been disrespectful toward myself and disrespectful of the thousands of victims against whom disproportionate force was being used,” Erdogan said. He alluded to the children killed in Gaza — 288 of them according to the United Nations special rapporteur — and asked: “What more can I say?”

Erdogan, 55, urged Obama to become “the voice of millions of silent people and the protector of millions of unprotected people — that is what the Middle East is expecting.”

He went on: “I consider personally the election of Barack Hussein Obama to have very great symbolic meaning. A Muslim and a Christian name — so in his name there is a synthesis, although people from time to time want to overlook that and they do it intentionally. Barack Hussein Obama.”

I suggested that synthesis was all very well but, with a center-right Israeli government just installed, and its nationalist foreign minister already proclaiming that “If you want peace prepare for war,” the prospects of finding new bridges between the Wes
t and the Muslim world were remote.

“Your targets can only be realized on the basis of dreams,” Erdogan said. “If everyone can say, looking at Obama, that is he is one of us, is that not befitting for the leading country in the world?”

Dreams aside, I see Obama moving methodically to dismantle the Manichean Bush paradigm — with us or against us in a global battle of good against evil called the war on terror — in favor of a new realism that places improved relations with the Muslim world at its fulcrum. Hence the early visit to Turkey, gestures toward Iran, and other forms of outreach.

This will lead to tensions with Israel, which had conveniently conflated its long national struggle with the Palestinians within the war on terror, but is an inevitable result of a rational reassessment of U.S. interests.

I asked Erdogan if Islam and modernity were compatible. “Islam is a religion,” he said, “It is not an ideology. For a Muslim, there is no such thing as to be against modernity. Why should a Muslim not be a modern person? I, as a Muslim, fulfill all the requirements of my religion and I live in a democratic, social state. Can there be difficulties? Yes. But they will be resolved at the end of a maturity period so long as there is mutual trust.”

The problem is, of course, that Islam has been deployed as an ideology in the anti-modern, murderous, death-to-the-West campaign of Al-Qaeda. But Erdogan is right: Islam is one of the great world religions. Obama’s steps to reassert that truth, and so bridge the most dangerous division in the world, are of fundamental strategic importance.

Synthesis begins with understanding, which is precisely what never interested his predecessor.

comment Readers are invited to comment on global.nytimes.com/opinion

” at Batla House: Unanswered Questions: Report is online

‘Encounter’ at Batla House: Unanswered Questions: Report is online | TwoCircles.net

‘Encounter’ at Batla House: Unanswered Questions: Report is online
Submitted by admin on 1 April 2009 – 7:13pm.

* Articles
* Crime/Terrorism
* Indian Muslim

By TwoCircles.net team

Batla House encounter, which saw two Muslim youth and one police officer killed is now a six months old news. Encounter, true or fake, in the national capital should have lead to investigation and scrutiny, but still questions remain unanswered. A group of Jamia teachers has compiled pubic information to try to piece together the incident. After selling all their printed copies, Jamia Teachers’ Solidarity Group has made a pdf version available to TwoCircles.net to put it online. Download link is given at the bottom of this page. Read and discuss.

The report by Jamia Teachers’ Solidarity Group has profile of those killed and arrested in the Batla House operation, contradictions in police version regarding the encounter operation, information about dreaded terrorists, bullet proof jacket, injuries and bullets to the suspected terrorists, evidences, escape routes and fired rounds, besides contradictions in the mastermind theory and instances of violations of NHRC guidelines for an encounter.

The teachers’ group has demanded a judicial probe headed by a sitting judge of the Supreme Court, transfer of investigations from the Delhi Police to CBI, exemplary punishment to police officers guilty of implicating innocent Muslim youth in false cases of terrorism and adequate compensation and jobs to those acquitted in the terror-related cases.

Some of the questions raised in the report are as follows:

1) Did the police have prior information about the presence of dreaded ‘terrorists’ in L-18 when they raided the flat? So far, conflicting versions have been provided by the police. In one version, they claim ignorance of such confirmed information, pleading that they went in only for a routine recee and were ambushed (then how did the Police Commissioner within hours declare Atif and Sajid to be the mastermind behind all blasts since 2005, when Sajid would have been 14-years-old); and in another, they claim to have put Atif under surveillance since 26th July 2008 (so how did these boys manage to plant bombs all over the city right under the Delhi Police’s nose?)

2) Were the Police men wearing Bullet proof vests (BPV) or not? In some statements, the Delhi Police said that they avoided wearing the BPVs in order not to alert the ‘terrorists’; in yet other statement they claim that their officer escaped all injury while firing upon an armed Sajid because he was wearing a BPV.

3) What explains the injury marks on the bodies of the deceased boys? Atif’s back was sloughed off and Sajid had bullet wounds on his head as though bullets had been pumped into his head while he was made to kneel―all of which raises doubts about the genuineness of the ‘shootout’.

4) The Police claim that Sajid was an expert bomb maker who used quartz clocks, detonators, ammonium nitrate, yet none of the ‘recoveries’ which even the police have purportedly made, comprise any of the above material that could be used for making Sajid’s ‘signature’ bombs. So what made Dadwal and his force conclude that Sajid was the one behind the blasts in Delhi and elsewhere?

5) Why is there such rigid resistance to any independent probe on the part of the government and the Delhi Police? So much so that the Lieutenant Governor has even rejected a magisterial enquiry, which is mandatory as per NHRC guidelines on encounter killings.

6) Why are post-mortem reports of all the three killed not being made public? Is there something to hide?

The report also carries brief profiles of the accused in the case, including the two students killed. The fact that most of them were students enrolled in educational institutions, whether Jamia or elsewhere, or working gives the impression that they were regular young men in search of better opportunities in life. None of their actions puts them under suspicion: they enrolled as students, bought SIM cards in their name, signed a rent lease deed, duly verified by the police (copy in report), provided genuine address details etc. Moreover, the day after the blasts in Delhi, there were several arrests and detentions in the Jamia Nagar area, which was common knowledge. It is highly unlikely that actual terrorists would make no attempt to move away from a neighborhood which was obviously under the police scanner to a safer hideout.

Testimonies of eyewitnesses at the Jan Sunwai (12 Oct 2008, Batla House) have also been included in the report. Neighbours testified that they found nothing strange or suspicious about the boys and resented the fact that no senior local resident was taken into confidence or to crosscheck any information about suspected terrorists. The manner in which the police operated raised suspicions about their real motives. Further, they also said that while the operation was on, the policemen could be seen throwing pots etc on to the 4th floor flat of L-18, and that they heard gun shots of only one kind. This naturally raises the misgiving that the police was trying to create an impression of cross fire and struggle, where none existed.

Get your copy:
*’Encounter’ at Batla House: Unanswered Questions*

*A Report by Jamia Teachers’ Solidarity group*

60 pp., Rs 35, February 2009.

For Copies contact:
Adil Mehdi, Dept of English, JMI (9990923027)indianlit@yahoo.com
Ahmed Sohaib , Centre for Comparative Religions, JMI (9899462042)sohaibnirvan@gmail.com
Ghazi Shahnawaz, Dept. of Psychology, JMI (9868221506) mgshahnawaz@gmail.com

Download the pdf version:

http://www.TwoCircles.net/files/Batla_House_encounter_report.pdf

How the Mujahideen was Started

Brzezinski: How the Mujahideen was Started

As the Taliban, Russia, Pakistan, Islamic jihad and sharia law in general, become hot topics lately, we thought it prudent to shed some light on one of Barack Obama’s leading foreign policy advisers – on Afghanistan.

mujahid-brzezinski

Interview of Zbigniew Brzezinski Le Nouvel Observateur (France), Jan 15-21, 1998, p. 76*

Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs [“From the Shadows”], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?

Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.

Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?

Brzezinski: It isn’t quite that. We didn’t push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.

Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn’t believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don’t regret anything today?

mujahid-brzezinski2

Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.

Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic [integrisme], having given arms and advice to future terrorists?

Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?

Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.

Brzezinski: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn’t a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.

* There are at least two editions of this magazine; with the perhaps sole exception of the Library of Congress, the version sent to the United States is shorter than the French version, and the Brzezinski interview was not included in the shorter version.

The above has been translated from the French by Bill Blum author of, “Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II” and “Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower”.

Original pdf: brzezinski-zbig-19980115-le-nouvel-observateur-cias-intervention-in-afghanistan

‘Gaza wears a face of misery’
Rizk says it takes one visit to Gaza to picture the kind of agony people endure daily [Gallo/ Getty]

Philip Rizk, 27, a freelance journalist and blogger who has been reporting from Gaza since 2005, was arrested by Egyptian security forces after a pro-Palestinian rally in Cairo on February 6.

He was released a few days later without being charged.

While in Gaza, he filmed The Palestinian Life, a documentary highlighting non-violent means of resistance against the Israeli occupation.

The film is premiering at the London International Documentary Festival on April 4. Here are excerpts from an interview Rizk gave to Al Jazeera shortly before the film’s debut.

Al Jazeera: Why were you detained and subsequently released by Egyptian authorities at the rally in Cairo?

Rizk: On February 6, I was part of a demonstration of 15 protesters against the Israeli siege on the Gaza Strip. We started from the outskirts of Cairo and walked in the direction toward Gaza. Some 12km later, we were stopped by security forces that singled me out from the rest. I was forced into their car; they blindfolded me and I had no idea where I was going. One of the protesters was a lawyer who had a car, so he and others followed the car which took me.

The police set up security checkpoints to slow them down and eventually they lost my trail.

The security men took me to three holding stations. By the time I arrived at the third destination, they gave me a number, 29, told me to forget my name and that’s where I stayed for four days. They interrogated me about everything I had ever done in my life: where I was born, who I knew … everything.

They didn’t charge me with anything, but while I was being interrogated, they accused me of being an Israeli spy. They also said I was dealing weapons to Hamas. So it seemed like they were trying to figure out what I was all about to put a file together on me.

You’ve been reporting from Gaza over the past couple of years and one of the first journalists allowed access through the tunnels. Are Palestinians still using them?

Rizk: Gazans function with whatever they have available

I lived in Gaza from 2005 to 2007 and worked there for an NGO called the Foundation for Relief and Reconciliation.

Gaza wears a face of misery and the living conditions are unimaginable. Unless you visit, you wouldn’t be able to picture the kind of agony Gazans have to live through on a daily basis. They function with whatever is available.

I was completely shocked when I returned in the summer of 2008. I discovered these tunnels myself and I couldn’t believe how out in the open they were. In the past, I had heard the entrances were from inside people’s living rooms, under their beds, or underneath a table, making it hard to find if ever an Israeli soldier would search their homes.

Last summer, I came across hundreds of tents, and underneath each of these tents were entrance points to hundreds of these tunnels. Egyptians and Israelis were well aware of them as these tunnels were all the people had as a means of transporting food and goods.

At least 85 per cent of the people are dependent on food aid. If the amount of aid was reduced, they would starve.

Refugee camps receive flour, oil and rice as aid and without these donations; they would not be able to survive.

They may be living but they’re not alive. There isn’t work to do; they’ve lost their dignity because of lack of work caused largely by the siege. Fathers have nothing to provide for their kids and in front of their wives they feel ashamed because there’s nothing for them to do; they can’t even provide their families with the most basic of needs.

The ironic thing is that the main providers for employment are the NGOs being funded by international organisations, which then serve to help keep the rest of the population alive. In the meanwhile, politicians don’t look for actual solutions to the conflict.

What doesn’t the media report on?

More than 1400 people died in Israel’s latest war on Gaza. But on a regular basis, Gazans die because of all sorts of causes that we don’t hear sufficiently about in the media. The sewage system is horrible, water is polluted and diseases are becoming an increasing phenomenon in Gaza.

Hospitals can’t cope because they face electricity shortages; a lot of Palestinians are in desperate need of kidney dialysis, the kinds of diseases that are out there are getting worse, it’s simply not a livable space.

The line between the meaning of life and death becomes very thin. As a student, you can spend your whole life trying to do well in school, get good grades – but all that effort goes to waste because there is no future for the class valedictorian.

Everyone alike is left completely powerless without hope and potential future. I’m even shocked at how well kids can even perform in these schools, considering how they live in a constant state of war.

There have been reports of tensions between Palestinians and Israeli settlers in Hebron. Is this a potentially explosive situation?

Rizk says the line between the meaning of life and death becomes very thin in Gaza

What happens in Gaza really stays in Gaza because some things aren’t reported. Israel has done so well at controlling the flow of information; they control everyone who goes in and out of the strip. It is easier for foreigners that are able to come in with NGOs working in Gaza. As far as the media goes, Israel hands out the permits and from mid November till the end of January or beginning of February, Israelis weren’t allowing anyone in, there was a blackout of information.

Another thing is how there isn’t so much of an interest from media organisations around the world to keep reporting on Gaza.

To them, there’s nothing new about the situation when in fact, the story there is constantly unfolding, breaking news is Gaza’s middle name. But because this breaking news always holds the same kind of information, no one cares to report on it.

So your documentary is to shed light on the situation in Gaza?

My documentary is a response to what I witnessed in Gaza and the West Bank and they are stories that don’t make it out in the media. Pa
lestinians are so easily identified as terrorists, wearing balaclavas, holding a gun or firing a Qassam rocket.

But they’re really everyday people just trying to make the best of their lives, putting their kids through school, finding a job, doing well in their final exams.

One thing I’ve noticed in the media is that the theme of violence is always associated with stories coming out of Gaza.

Why not focus on stories of non-violent resistance? While some Palestinians return Israeli violence with further violence, the vast majority does not, and the Arabic word for such everyday acts of non-violent protest is sumoud, which means steadfastness, perseverance.

No matter what Israelis do to the people I met, they continued fighting for their right to remain on their land, their right to stay alive. Many of the people I filmed aren’t affiliated with political parties, they are normal people like you and I.

I needed to go to Palestine to understand what was going on there. Studying and reading about it didn’t make sense until I saw the wall, the settlements and physical occupation. After doing so, and going through the kinds of experiences I went through, I wanted to translate what I saw into the medium of film.

I’m also planning a film in West Africa, and then I’d like to focus on Egypt, which is a real police state. There’s red tape everywhere so it’s going to be a challenge.

For more information on Rizk’s documentary, visit thispalestinianlife.org.

 Source: Al Jazeera

Israeli soldiers confess

During Israel’s latest aggression on the Gaza Strip, Palestinians widely reported the indiscriminate killing of civilians along with numerous war crimes and atrocities committed by the Israeli army. Now Israeli officers and soldiers are confirming the allegations and adding witness detail. Will the world finally listen and constitute a war crimes tribunal for Gaza and its victims?

Israeli soldiers confess

Revelations are emerging of war crimes committed in Gaza by Israel that makes obligatory an international investigation, writes Saleh Al-Naami

Click to view caption
One of the hundreds of children killed during the Israeli war on Gaza


As calls increase for an international investigation into the crimes that Israel committed during its recent war on the Gaza Strip, confessions by Israeli army officers and soldiers confirm that the military issued clear instructions during the war for the indiscriminate killing of Palestinian civilians.

Israeli television Channel 10, Haaretz newspaper, and the news website Ynet have all published confessions made by Israeli officers and soldiers confirming that the army issued clear directives for shooting Palestinian civilians, raiding homes and opening fire within them, and unjustifiably destroying Palestinian property. These officers and soldiers have said that the Israeli army’s actions during the war on Gaza disqualify its claims that its forces treated Palestinians with “lofty ethics and [that it] maintained the honour of arms”. Their statements have swept away Israeli leaders’ claims that the occupation army avoided harming Palestinian civilians.

Haaretz reported a soldier as saying that the Israeli army took over a Palestinian house and placed its entire family in a single room while soldiers took up position on the roof. Several days later, these soldiers withdrew and left the family in the room. When another Israeli military unit entered the house, it placed machine guns on the rooftop and the head of the unit then allowed the family, consisting of a mother and her two children, to leave the house. The soldier in charge of the artillery immediately opened fire on them, killing them all.

Another soldier said that the commander of one of the military detachments ordered his soldiers to shoot an elderly Palestinian woman from a range of 100 metres. When one of the soldiers contested this order by saying that there must be limits and that it was unacceptable to attack an old woman, the commander responded, “every person here is considered a saboteur or terrorist,” and the soldiers shot her dead.

Israeli television Channel 10 broadcast a documentary film showing a unit commander ordering his soldiers to destroy homes over their occupants’ heads. He told them, “I want a completely clean area. The houses must be pulled down over their heads, and anyone found in the areas we advance upon must be treated as an enemy and immediately killed.” The same channel also broadcast the testimonies of soldiers who said that they spat on food before it went to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

The confessing officers and soldiers have suggested that they understood their military directives to have allowed them to do anything in order to protect their lives. Their testimonies further reveal that the rabbis who met with soldiers during the war had stressed to them that this was a religious war and that they should not treat lightly anyone who threatened “Jews remaining on the land of their fathers and forefathers,” and that such threats should be treated “without mercy”. These soldiers said that the rabbis’ sermons played a major role in their making light of the lives of innocent Palestinian civilians, such that they even felt that it was their duty to kill them.

One of these soldiers said that his colleagues had written “Death to Arabs” on the walls of Palestinian houses, and that they had spat on anything that reminded Palestinians of their loved ones. The confessing officers and soldiers said that their leaders had stressed to them that their lives were much more important than those of Palestinian civilians. They further noted that killing in cold blood and the random opening of fire had not only taken place in the units they had served in, but in all of the fighting units that took part in the war. And these killings, they stressed, took place without any apparent regret or hesitation.

In addition to these reports, a Palestinian human rights organisation has announced that it found a military document confirming that the army issued orders to open fire on Palestinian emergency relief teams during the war, with the aim of killing them. The Palestinian Human Rights Centre, whose headquarters is in Gaza City, told Al-Ahram Weekly that its researchers found the document in the home of Sami Darduneh in Jebel Al-Ris, east of Jabalya Refugee Camp, which soldiers had turned into a temporary military base. The document indicates that clear instructions were given to shoot to kill Palestinian emergency relief teams attempting to rescue the injured and remove the killed. Issued on 16 January, just days before the end of the war, the document also calls for opening fire on anyone crossing Salaheddin Street, which runs north-south through the Gaza Strip and then turns east towards the area in which occupation forces were found.

This document indicates that the army did not tell the truth when it claimed that it had not targeted emergency relief teams. It also shows that the army’s actual firing directives issued to Israeli soldiers contradict the army’s claims that soldiers were instructed to first fire warning shots into the air and then to fire at the lower body.

Deputy director of the Palestinian Human Rights Centre Eyad Al-Ilmi told the Weekly that the evidence left behind by the occupation army indisputably indicates that major war crimes were committed during the recent Israeli offensive on the Gaza Strip. Al-Ilmi says that the aftermath of destruction and purposeful killing, as well as the testimonies collected following the war, undermine the Israeli narrative of what took place. The Israeli army, he says, is accustomed to denying any relation to war crimes, and yet the evidence shows that war crimes were clearly committed. Al-Ilmi further says that if international will existed, it would be possible to begin trying Israeli individuals for the war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the recent offence.

Al-Ilmi says that during the war on the Gaza Strip the Israeli army killed 17 emergency relief team members and injured dozens more, including doctors, nurses and ambulance drivers. The targeting of emergency relief teams also led to the deaths of scores of those injured during the war, many bleeding to death before rescue teams could reach them. The bodies of some of those killed in areas raided by the Israelis during the war remained in place for over two weeks without rescue teams being able to reach them, a situation that left their corpses prey to stray dogs and vermin.

It has also become clear that the Israeli army encouraged a culture of killing among its soldiers by allowing fighting units to wear symbols and slogans calling for the killing of pregnant women and children. Haaretz newspaper reported that members of select units in the Israeli army wore clothing printed with expres
sions of “savouring the killing of children and women”. The paper reported that soldiers placed images and phrases on their clothing calling for the killing of children and women and the destruction of mosques, as well as slogans indicating that soldiers made sure that Palestinian civilians were killed after firing on them. It printed a photograph of one of these images, showing a pregnant Palestinian woman in a sniper’s target, and beneath it the phrase “One Shot, Two Kills”. Other symbols bore slogans that justify killing Palestinian children before they become fighters, one of them being, “It doesn’t matter how it started… we’ll put an end to it.” Beneath other symbols was the phrase, “We won’t rest until certain of death,” as well as other crude references. Haaretz confirmed that the army had sanctioned these images and slogans.

The paper noted that the army had allowed one of its death squads to place these slogans on its soldiers’ clothing, and that it had sometimes barred some units from wearing racist slogans while allowing others to do so. For example, the army refused to allow one of the infantry units to wear the slogan “May every Arab mother know that her son’s fate is in my hands,” and yet allowed the soldiers of another unit to wear it. The paper reported that popular racist slogans among soldiers and officers graduating from sniper training included the image of a Palestinian child in a target frame and “The smaller, the harder” written below it, meaning that the younger the Palestinian child, the more painful their killing is to the family.

Israeli intellectual Gideon Levy says that the crimes committed by soldiers form an extension of the last nine years, during which Israeli soldiers have killed about 5,000 Palestinians, at least half of who were innocent civilians, including 1,000 children. In an article published in Haaretz, Levy wrote that the killing of Palestinians has become a commonplace action for Israeli soldiers. “An army whose armoured cruisers have not clashed with an enemy tank over the last 36 years, and whose pilots have never encountered a war plane from the other side, have been trained to believe that the only mission of a tank is to crush private vehicles and that the mission of a pilot is to bomb residential areas,” he wrote.

Levy criticises the response of the government and army to the soldiers’ confessions by describing them as “ridiculous and merely a claim that aims to mislead”. He counters that the Israeli army knew very well what its soldiers were doing in Gaza.

Israeli political analyst Akiva Eldar says that now the accomplishments of the military campaign on the Gaza Strip have dissipated, the confessions by soldiers have shown that Israel’s losses in the war were major. “These soldiers witnessed the killing of innocent civilians, destruction for the sake of destruction, families being thrown out of homes that were taken over and turned into temporary military sites, and insensitivity towards human life and an inclination towards animalistic behaviour,” Eldar says. He warns of the ramifications of the army’s “scandalous” behaviour, saying, “Slow-paced investigations within the Israeli army are not enough. This is the army that is ever absorbing religious sternness from the military rabbinical school. This should be openly investigated with external tools, and should be pulled out from the roots, for fear that rot will destroy the Israeli army and Israeli society.”

© Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved

UN appoints Gaza war investigator

UN appoints Gaza war investigator

Richard Goldstone, right, will lead the fact-finding investigation into the Gaza war [Reuters]

The United Nations has appointed a former war crimes prosecutor to investigate offences allegedly committed by Israeli and Palestinian fighters during Israel’s war on Gaza.

Richard Goldstone, a Jewish judge from South Africa, will lead a fact-finding team on the mission, ordered by the Human Rights Council in January.

“I am confident the mission will be in a position to assess, in an independent and impartial manner, all human rights and humanitarian law violations committed in the context of the Gaza conflict,” Goldstone said in a statement issued on Friday.

Other members of the group are Christine Chinkin, a British professor of international law, Hina Jilani, a Pakistani lawyer and retired Irish army colonel Desmond Travers.

Palestinian focus

The investigation’s mandate is to focus only on Palestinian victims of the 22-day war.

In depth


Analysis and features from after the war

More than 1,100 Palestinians were killed when Israel launched a two-week ground offensive on Gaza in December and January after a week of aerial bombardment.

The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights put the final death toll at 1,417, including 926 civilians, and published a list of their names.

The Israeli military, however, says only 295 civilians were among 1,116 Palestinians killed between December 27 and January 18, without providing a list of the dead.

It insists it did everything it could to prevent casualties among Gaza civilians during the war, including dropping leaflets and sending phone messages to civilians to evacuate certain areas.

The military also claims Hamas fighters used civilians as human shields, booby-trapped homes and shot at troops from densely populated areas.

Israeli co-operation

Israeli officials on Friday did not say whether or not they would co-operate with the UN investigation.

It has rejected previous human rights council investigations, including one led by Desmond Tutu, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, calling them “biased”.

The Israeli military earlier in the week closed its own investigation into claims that Israeli troops shot unarmed Palestinian women and children during the Gaza war.

Military investigators said on Monday that they “found crucial components of [the allegations] were based on hearsay and were not supported by specific personal knowledge”.

 Source: Agencies

” network revealed

Global ‘cyber spy’ network revealed

The Canadian team said the “GhostNet” system was armed with sophisticated spy tools [GALLO/GETTY]

A cyber spy network based almost entirely in China has hacked into computer networks around the world, stealing classified information from governments and private organisations in more than 100 countries, a team of Canadian researchers has reported.

The system, dubbed “GhostNet” by the researchers, infiltrated networks in dozens of embassies, foreign ministries, government departments and offices in several cities belonging to the Dalai Lama’s Tibetan government-in-exile, the Canadian team said.

The network was uncovered after the Munk Centre for International Studies was initially approached by the Dalai Lama’s office to investigate allegations of Chinese espionage.

In over 10 months of study, they then found a far larger spy network, targeting more than 1,295 infected computers in 103 countries.

‘High-value targets’

According to one of the researchers, close to 30 per cent of the infected computers “are considered high-value political and economic targets”.

‘GhostNet’

Spy network based almost entirely in China, although it is not clear who is running it or for what purpose

 Network uses malicious software, or “malware” installed in remote computers, allowing hackers to retrieve files and information at will

 Software allows hackers to remotely switch on infected computers’ webcams and microphones, enabling them to listen in on conversations

 Researchers say at least 1,295 computers in 103 countries were found to be infected

They include computers located at ministries of foreign affairs, embassies, international organisations, news media, and NGOs, Ronald Deibert, director of Munk’s Citizen Lab, wrote in an email.

The study did not name specifically which governments had been targeted by the spy network, although the researchers said the system was focused on the governments of South and Southeast Asian nations.

They said they had seen no evidence that US government offices had been breached.

The researchers said the GhostNet system – which they described as still active – had been armed with a wide-ranging set of tools, including the ability to retrieve documents, and turn on web cameras and audio systems to act as remote listening posts.

The study found that the network was based almost exclusively in China, although the researchers stopped short of saying the Chinese government was involved in the system.

Easy to hide

“One of the characteristics of cyber-attacks of the sort we document here is the ease by which attribution can be obscured,” Deibert said.

Chinese officials have denied the government is involved in cyber spying [GALLO/GETTY]

“Regardless of who or what is ultimately in control of GhostNet, it is the capabilities of exploitation, and the strategic intelligence that can be harvested from it, which matters most.”

He said the study highlighted the growing capabilities of cyber attacks and the ease with which the internet can be used to gather high value and sensitive information.

Speaking to The New York Times, a spokesman for the Chinese Consulate in the city dismissed the idea China was involved.

“These are old stories and they are nonsense,” Wenqi Gao, told the paper.

“The Chinese government is opposed to and strictly forbids any cybercrime.”

musical aspirations of cats

Cat listening to  Lata Mangeshkar  

 

 Cat listening to   Himesh Reshmia  

 

 Cat listening to   BABA Ram Dev  

 

 Cat listening to  Anup Jalota  


 Cat listening to  Kumar Sanu  


 Cat listening to   you

Action: Ask Calif. Radio Station to Reprimand Anti-Muslim Hosts

April 2, 2009
Action Alert
Forward to a Friend Support CAIR Contact Us Update Your Profile

CAIR ACTION ALERT #572:

Action: Ask Calif. Radio Station to Reprimand Anti-Muslim Hosts
Segment misstated Muslim beliefs, mocked Islam and political participation by U.S. Muslims

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 4/2/2009) – CAIR today called on a San Francisco, Calif., radio station to reprimand two talk show hosts for a recent segment in which they mocked Islam, misstated Muslim beliefs and cast suspicion on political participation by American Muslims.

KSFO 560-AM host Brian Sussman and co-host “Officer Vic” said during their Monday program: “Islamic finance is about living within your means and helping the needy – unless they’re Jews,” and “The great honorable qualities of that good old time religion: honor killings, female circumcision, not allowing women to drive…Jews are monkeys, pigs.”

Listen to the audio.

CAIR is asking American Muslims and other people of conscience to contact KSFO officials and advertisers to express their concerns about the hosts’ anti-Muslim remarks.

“Radio hosts are free to hold bigoted views, but listeners have no obligation to subsidize those views by purchasing the goods or services of companies that choose to advertise on hate-filled programs,” said CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper. “So-called ‘honor killings,’ female genital mutilation and not allowing women to drive are not part of Islam. Muslims respect Jews and Christians as ‘people of the book’ who received earlier revelations from God.”

He cited the Quran, Islam’s revealed text, which states: “Those who believe (in the Quran), those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), the Sabians, and the Christians – any who believe in God and the Last Day and work righteousness – on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.” (Quran, 5:69)

Hooper said this was not the first time Sussman made offensive remarks relating to Islam. In 2005, he asked a caller to prove he was not Muslim by saying “Allah is a whore.” In 2007, another host at KSFO warned “enemy” Muslim nations: “You keep screwing around with stuff like this, we’re going to kill a bunch of you – millions of you.”

CAIR is part of the Hate Hurts America Multifaith Community Coalition (HHA), a group of religious and civic organizations seeking to challenge hate speech in American society.

HHA was formed as a result of radio talk show host Michael Savage’s rhetorical attacks on religious and ethnic minorities. It waged a successful campaign to urge advertisers to stop running commercials on Savage’s program. The coalition includes public officials and civil rights advocates, as well as representatives of the Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Latino, and Asian communities.

SEE: How Islamophobes Spread Fear, Bigotry and Misinformation

IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUESTED: (As always, be POLITE.)

1. CONTACT KSFO to express your concerns about the hosts’ anti-Muslim remarks and to ask that they be formally reprimanded.

CONTACT:

Mr. Michael Luckoff
President & General Manager
KSFO-AM
900 Front Street
Tel: (415) 954-8181
Fax: (415) 391-2795
E-Mail: mickey.luckoff@citcomm.com

Also e-mail the station: http://www.ksfo560.com/contactus.asp
Copy to: jack.swanson@citcomm.com, info@cair.com, anthony.licciardi@citcomm.com, briansussman2@yahoo.com, deidra.lieberman@citcomm.com, ken.berry@citcomm.com, leerodgers@abc-sf.com, ksfordb@abc.com

2. LISTEN TO THE STATION either in the San Francisco Bay area or online at: http://www.ksfo560.com/ Take note of the contact information for advertisers and contact them to express your concerns about the hosts’ anti-Muslim views

Of Ganymedes

A teachers job is often thankless…I have known many who started the job with enthusiasm which declined as I watched…often exponentially.

But today, my day was made when I was presented with a set of jeans and T shirt by my erstwhile students.

Maybe they knew the drudge of a teacher since they were all three of them teachers themselves in other engineering colleges (and studying for M. Tech. here in TKM College of Engineering)

This is a new thing to me. 25 years of unrelenting sameness of students’ psychology turned me a cynic. Today the cynic is baffled. The optimist in me says “I told you so”.

Anyway my next classes will be a bit more sincere. The bright young faces who will sit before me in future classes will not listen to a jaded pessimist  but one who believes that his voice will be engraved in impressionable minds.